main-photo

We in a citing index:

CIVIL PROCESS IN COMMENT

FEATURES AND IMPORTANCE OF SYSTEMATIZATION OF NORMS ON RECONCILIATION IN PROCEDURAL CODES
E.I. NOSYREVA, D.G. FILCHENKO

THE NORMATIVELY FIXED “CRITERIA” OF QUALIFIED LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS AND ARBITRATION PROCEDURE ARE ON THE AGENDA (IN THE LIGHT OF THE RESOLUTION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION OF 16 JULY 2020 NO. 37-P)
D.I. BEKYASHEVA

ARTICLE-BY-ARTICLE COMMENTARY TO THE ARBITRATION PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (CHAPTER 28.1)
E.S. RAZDYAKONOV, I.N. TARASOV

SYSTEMATIZATION OF RULES ON CONCILIATION PROCEDURES AND ITS MAIN CHARACTERISTICS (in Accordance with the Federal Law of 27 july 2019 no. 197-FZ)
A.G. PLESHANOV

CONCEPT OF IMPROVEMENT OF ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IN SOCIALLY SIGNIFICANT CASES (DRAFT)
V.V. YARKOV, E.N. KUZNETSOV

ADVANCED TOPICS OF COUNTER-CLAIM: COURT PRACTICE AND THEORY
I.S. ARKHIPOV, P.N. MATSKEVICH

ARTICLE-BY-ARTICLE COMMENTARY TO THE ARBITRATION PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (chapter 6)
I.V. RESHETNIKOVA

ARTICLE-BY-ARTICLE COMMENTARY TO THE ARBITRATION PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (Chapter 30, § 3)
I.G. RENZ

LEGISLATOR’S REFUSAL OF THE TERM “JURISDICTION” OR VULNERABLE RULES OF “NEW” JURISDICTION: WHAT’S NEXT?
D.I. BEKYASHEVA

ARTICLE-BY-ARTICLE COMMENTARY TO THE ARBITRATION PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (continuation)
D.Kh. VALEEV, M.R. ZAGIDULLIN, R.B. SITDIKOV

Previous 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 ... 113 Next