Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

ARTICLE-BY-ARTICLE COMMENTARY TO THE ARBITRATION PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (chapter 6)

ARTICLE-BY-ARTICLE COMMENTARY
TO THE ARBITRATION PROCEDURE CODE
OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (chapter 6)

I.V. RESHETNIKOVA,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor,
Chairman of the Arbitration Court of the Ural District,
Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation

DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-1-100-132

In this commentary, the author presents an updated analysis of Chapter 6 “Representation
in an Arbitration Court” of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation
as amended by Federal Law of November 28, 2018 No. 451-FZ, which amends certain
legislative acts of the Russian Federation that enter into force on the day it begins the
activities of the new cassation courts of general jurisdiction and the courts of appeal of
general jurisdiction. In accordance with the innovations, the essence of the reform in the
part of the commented chapter is that representatives from arbitration procedure, as well
as at the current moment in the administrative process, will need to submit evidence
of their competence. To participate in the process, representatives will need to present
an education certificate/university diploma of higher legal education or to confirm an
academic degree in a legal specialty. However, in the Arbitration Procedure Code, there are
several exceptions to the general rule defining the requirements for representatives, that is
the requirements for representatives do not apply to patent attorneys for disputes related
to the legal protection of intellectual property and individualization means, arbitration
managers in the performance of assigned on them duties in a bankruptcy case, as well as
other persons specified in the federal act.

Keywords: arbitration procedure; representation; advocacy; principal; agent.

References

Prikhodko I.A., Bondarenko A.V., Stoliarenko V.M. Kommentarii k izmeneniiam,
vnesennym v APK RF FZ ot 19.07.2009 g. № 205-FZ [Commentary to Amendments to
the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation by Federal Law of July 19,
2009 No. 205-FZ]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia, 2010. 344 p. (In Russ.)
Radchenko V.I. (ed.). Kommentarii k GPK RF [Commentary to the Civil Procedure
Code of the Russian Federation]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Norma, 2006. 926 p. (In Russ.)
Sherstiuk V.M. Arbitrazhnyi protsess v voprosakh i otvetakh [Arbitration Procedure
in Questions and Answers]. Moscow: Gorodets, 1998. 336 p. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

I.V. Reshetnikova (Yekaterinburg, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor,
Chairman of the Arbitration Court of the Ural District, Honored Lawyer of the Russian
Federation (32 Lenina St., Yekaterinburg, 620075, Russia; e-mail: f09.ireshetnikova@
arbitr.ru).

Recommended citation

Reshetnikova I.V. Postateinyi kommentarii k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual’nomu
kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii (gl. 6) [Article-by-Article Commentary to the Arbitration
Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (Chapter 6)]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa
– Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 100–132. (In Russ.) https://doi.
org/10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-1-100-132

el_.png   it_.png   book.png

I.V. RESHETNIKOVA