Наши индексы цитирования:
Экономический анализ права как перспективный метод исследования гражданского процесса
С.А. Курочкин,
кандидат юридических наук, доцент кафедры гражданского процесса
Уральской государственной юридической академии
На примере современного гражданского процесса в статье показаны перспективы использования в Российской Федерации экономического анализа права как метода исследования правовых явлений.
В работе кратко изложены: сущность экономического анализа права как метода, его виды, а также роль в исследовании гражданского процесса. По итогам предложены выводы о путях повышения эффективности российской системы гражданского судопроизводства.
Ключевые слова: гражданское судопроизводство; гражданский процесс; экономический анализ права; эффективность; система.
References
Khabrieva T.Y. Economic and legal analysis: a methodological approach // World of Law. 2010. No. 12. P. 6.
Kerimov D.A. Methodology of law: the object, function, problems in the philosophy of law. M., 2003. P. 498.
Babaev V.K. Logical problems of socialist law: Abstract of Dissertation. Doctor of Legal Sciences. M., 1980. P. 11.
Avdeenko N.I. Mechanism and extent of regulatory impact of civil procedural law. L., 1969. P. 7.
Auzan A.A. and others. The effectiveness of civil proceedings in Russia: institutional analysis and institutional design. M., 2005. P. 9.
Maleshin D.Y. Methodology of civil procedure. M., 2010. P. 70.
Alekseev S.S. General theory of law. M., 2008. P. 18. Yarkov V.V. Legal facts in civil procedure. M., 2012. P. 535.
Fierro H. Courts, Justice and Ecciency: A Socio-Legal Study of Economic Rationality in Adjudication. Oxford, 2003. P. 22.
Cabrillo F., Fitzpatrick S. Xe Economics of Courts and Litigation. Cheltenham, 2008. P. 15.
Rubin P. Micro and Macro Legal Ecciency: Supply and Demand // Supreme Court Economic Review. 2005. Vol. 13. P. 19.
Arndt D. Economic Analysis of Settlements: Civil Procedure Law. Augsburg, 2007. P. 8.
Shmakov A.V. Economic Analysis of Law. M., 2011. P. 81.
Odintsova M.I. Economics of Law. M., 2007. P. 24.
Shavell S. Foundations of Economic Analysis of Law. Harvard, 2004. P. 4.
Becker G. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago, 1990. P. 3–4.
Posner R. The Problems of Jurisprudence. Harvard, 1993. P. 353.
Posner R. On the application of economic theory and its abuse in the analysis of law // Origins: the economy in the context of history and culture. M., 2004. P. 318, 319.
Miller G. The Legal-Economic Analysis of Comparative Civil Procedure // The American Journal of Comparative Law. 1997. Vol. 45. No. 4. P. 906.
Posner R. Economic analysis of law: In 2 vols. / Translated from English by A.A. Fofonov; Ed. by V.L. Tambovtsev. St. Petersburg, 2004. Vol. 2. P. 760.
Kirchner C. The diccult reception of Law and Economics in Germany // International Review of Law and Economics. 1991. Vol. 11. P. 277–292.
Georgakopoulos N. Principles and methods of law and economics: basic tools for normative reasoning. NY, 2005. P. 50–51.
Miceli T. The Economic Approach to Law. Stanford, 2004. P. 4.
Mogilevsky V.D. Methodology of systems. M., 1999. P. 91.
Levin H., Mc Ewan P. Cost-Ebectiveness Analysis: Methods and Applications. 2nd ed. Sage Publications, 2000. P. 108.
Gerlis S., Loughlin P. Civil procedure. L., 2001. P. 6. Grainger I., Fealy M. Xe civil procedure rules in action. L., 2000. P. 21.
Fursov D.A., Kharlamova I.V. The theory of justice in a brief three-volume exposition of civil cases. Volume One: Xe theory and practice of organization justice. M., 2009. P. 149–167.
Vlasov A.A. Actual problems of ecciency of justice in civil matters // The modern doctrine of civil, arbitrazh and enforcement proceedings: theory and practice: Collected scientific articles. Krasnodar; St. Petersburg, 2004. P. 202–203.
Gubenok I.V. Ecciency of justice as a guarantee of protection of rights (theory and practice): Abstract of Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Nizhny Novgorod, 2007. P. 8, 14.
Protasov V.N. Xeoretical foundations of law: Abstract of Dissertation. Doctor of Legal Sciences. M., 1993. P. 24.
Sakhnova T.V. About the concept of civil procedure and procedural law // The modern doctrine of civil, arbitrazh and enforcement proceedings: theory and Practice: Collected scientific articles. Krasnodar; St. Petersburg, 2004. P. 75.
Pashkov A.S., Fomin E.A., Yavich L.S. Xe ebectiveness of the law. L., 1977. P. 38.
Zhinkin S.A. Ebectiveness of the law: anthropological and value dimension: Abstract of Dissertation. Doctor of Legal Sciences. Krasnodar, 2009. P. 33.
Gadjiyev G.A. Cost ecciency, legal ethics and credibility of the state // Journal of Russian Law. 2012. No. 1. P. 13.
Information about the author
Kurochkin S.A. (Ekaterinburg) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Ural State Law Academy (620137, Sverdlovsk region, Ekaterinburg city, Komsomolskaya st., 21, e-mail: [email protected]).
С.А. Курочкин
Реклама
Наши партнеры
