А.Р. Султанов,

начальник юридического управления ОАО  "Нижнекамскнефтехим"

В статье автор рассуждает об особенностях осуществления правосудия по гражданским делам в РФ, а также о том, насколько установленные законом процессуальные правила рассмотрения гражданских дел соответствуют интересам государства и заинтересованных лиц.

Ключевые слова: гражданский процесс; конституционное право.

References 

   Sorokin V.V. The Russian tradition of law // History of State and Law. 2011. No. 11. 

   Civil Procedure: Textbook / Ed. by m.K. Treushnikov. m., 2007. 

   Danilenko G.M. The right to a fair trial. m., 2000. P. 37. 

  Golubok S.A. International legal standards of the right to judicial protection // Juris- prudence. 2007. No. 1. P. 112. 

  Yudin A.V. Historical reasons for the ineffectiveness of the modern civil justice // Arbitration and Litigation. 2007. No. 12. P. 12–14. 

 Gataullin E.A. marginal jurisprudence. Statement of the problem on the example of manipulation of the jurisdiction // Corporate disputes. 2005. No. 1. P. 99. 

  Montesquieu Sh. The Spirit of Laws // Montesquieu Sh. Selected Works. m., 1955. P. 225. 

  Bereziy A.E. Arbitrazh court of appeal and accessibility, and efficiency of justice (for example, FAS NWB) // All-Russian scientific-practical conference «Problems of accessibility and effectiveness of justice in arbitration and civil proceedings», held at the initiative of and with the participation of the law firm «Lidzhist». m., 2001. Р. 153. 

  Puchinsky V.K. Civil proceedings in foreign countries. m., 2008. 

  Kudryavtseva E.V. Civil proceedings in England. m., 2008. 

  Bocharov N.S. Facilitate the burden of proof in civil proceedings in Russia and Canada // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, and practice. 2007. No. 1 

   Yudin A.V. Application by arbitrazh courts of rules of responsibility for the abuse of procedural rights // Law and Economics. 2006. No. 12. 

   Dmitriev G.K. morality and international law. m., 1991. Р. 140–148. 

   Kalamkaryan R.A. Estoppel in international law. m., 2001. 

  Kalamkaryan R.A. The rule of law in international relations. m., 2004. Р. 253. 

  Kalamkaryan R.A. Estoppel as an institution of international law // International Lawyer. 2004. No. 1. Р. 10–22. 

  Serikov Y.A. Presumptions in civil proceedings. m., 2008.  

  Nakhova E.A. The role of presumptions and fictions in the allocation of responsibility for proving: Abstract of Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Saratov, 2004. 

  Yablochkov T.M. Textbook of Russian civil proceedings. Yaroslavl, 1912. Р. 213. 

  Yudin A.V. Silence gives consent? // ej-Lawyer. 2010. No 41. P. 5. 

  Shemeneva O.N. Uncontested facts in the arbitrazh proceedings // Arbitration and Litigation. 2011. No. 2. P. 19–22. 

  Kulakov V.Y. Problems of theoretical validity and practical applicability of the rules of Part 3.1 of Art. 70 of the APC // Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, and practice. 2011. No. 10. Р. 18–26. 

  Afanasyev S.F., Katukov S.J. On proving negative facts and possibilities of fiction in their recognition of the justification for civil cases // Russian Justice. 2011. No. 3. Р. 69–72. 

Information about the author 

    Sultanov A.R. (Niznekamsk) – Head of Legal Department «Nizhnekamskneftekhim» (423584, Tatarstan Republic, Nizhnekamsk city, OAO «Nizhnekamskneftekhim», e-mail: [email protected])