А.Р. Султанов, 

начальник юридического управления 

ПАО «Нижнекамскнефтехим» 

В статье анализируются вопросы влияния постановлений ЕСПЧ на гражданское судопроизводство в Российской Федерации. Дискуссия была посвящена проблеме того, что в ГПК РФ отсутствовала законодательно установленная возможность пересмотра по вновь открывшимся обстоятельствам судебных решений после того, как постановлением ЕСПЧ было установлено нарушение Конвенции о защите прав человека и основных свобод. Ситуация изменилась вследствие принятия Постановления Конституционного Суда РФ от 26 февраля 2010 г. № 4-П «По делу о проверке конституционности части второй статьи 392 Гражданского процессуального кодекса Российской Федерации в связи с жалобами граждан А.А. Дорошка, А.Е. Кота и Е.Ю. Федотовой», в котором было дано разъяснение, согласно которому ч. 2 ст. 392 ГПК РФ – по своему конституционно-правовому смыслу в системе действующего правового регулирования, в том числе с учетом провозглашенного ст. 15 (ч. 4) Конституции РФ приоритета правил международного договора Российской Федерации, – не может рассматриваться как позволяющая суду общей юрисдикции отказывать в пересмотре по заявлению гражданина вынесенного им судебного постановления по вновь открывшимся обстоятельствам в случае, если ЕСПЧ установлено нарушение положений Конвенции о защите прав человека и основных свобод при рассмотрении конкретного дела. 

Ключевые слова: ЕСПЧ; Конституционный Суд РФ; пересмотр по новым и вновь открывшимся обстоятельствам. 

References 

Anishina V.I. Problemy primenenija rossijskimi sudami reshenij Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [Problems of Application of Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights by Russian Courts]. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo = International Public and Private Law, 2008, no. 2, pp. 14–17. (In Russian) 

Bondar’ N.S Konventsionnaja jurisdiktsija ESPCh v sootnoshenii s kompetentsiej Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF [Conventional Jurisdiction of the ECHR in Relation to the Competence of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2006, no. 6. (In Russian) 

Ershov V.V. Pretsedenty tolkovanija Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [Precedents of Interpretation of the European Court of Human Rights]. Rossijskoe pravosudie = Russian Justice, 2007, no. 1 (9), p. 31. (In Russian) 

Marchenko M.N. Juridicheskaja priroda i harakter reshenij Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka [The Legal Nature and Character of Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights]. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2006, no. 2, pp. 11–12. (In Russian) 

Sultanov A.R. Unifikatsija norm o peresmotre po vnov’ otkryvshimsja obstojatel’stvam kak sovershenstvovanie sredstv ispravlenija sudebnoj oshibki [Unification of Standards on Review on Newly Discovered Circumstances as the Improvement of Means of Correction of a Judicial Error]. Zakon = Law, 2007, no. 11, pp. 99–113. (In Russian) 

Ignatenko G.V. Sovremennye aspekty sudebnogo pravoprimenenija mezhdunarodnyh aktov [Modern Aspects of Judicial Enforcement of International acts]. In Primenenie mezhdunarodnyh dogovorov v oblasti prav cheloveka v pravovoj sisteme RF: Sbornik nauchnyh trudov [Application of International Treaties on Human Rights in the Legal System of the Russian Federation: Collection of Scientific Papers]. Ekaterinburg. 2003, p. 51. (In Russian) 

Sultanov A.R. Pravovye pozitsii postanovlenij Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF i postanovlenij ESPCh i ih pravovoe znachenie dlja grazhdanskogo protsessa [Legal Positions of Judgments of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the ECHR and Their Legal Significance for Civil Procedure]. Zakonodatel’stvo i jekonomika = Legislation and Economy, 2011, no. 4. (In Russian) 

Sultanov A.R. Pravovye posledstvija postanovlenij Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [Legal Effects of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2011, no. 9. (In Russian) 

Sultanov A.R. O nekotoryh protsessual’nyh posledstvijah postanovlenij ESPCh [On Some Procedural Effects of Judgments of the ECHR]. Rossijskaja justitsija = Russian Justice, 2014, no. 1, pp. 24–28. (In Russian) 

Zor’kin V.D. Vzaimodejstvie natsional’nogo i nadnatsional’nogo pravosudija: novye vyzovy i perspektivy (doklad na II Mezhdunarodnom yuridicheskom forume (Sankt- Peterburg, 17 maya 2012 g.)) [The Interaction of National and Supra-National Justice: New Challenges and Perspectives (Report on the II International Legal Forum (St. Petersburg, May 17, 2012))]. (In Russian) 

Sultanov A.R. Prodolzhenie dela «Markin protiv Rossii», ili kak prezidium Leningradskogo okruzhnogo voennogo suda vozbudil spor o konstitutsionnosti p. 3 i 4 ch. 4 st. 392 vo vzaimosvjazi so st. 11 GPK RF [Continuation of the Case «Markin v. Russia», or how the Presidium of the Leningrad Military District Court Opened a Debate about Constitutionality of Para. 3 and 4 of Part 4 of Art. 392 in Conjunction with Art. 11 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2013, no. 5, pp. 260–286. (In Russian) 

Zor’kin V.D. Problemy realizatsii konventsii o pravah cheloveka [Problems of Realization of Convention on Human Rights] (http://www.ksrf.ru/ru/News/Speech/ Pages/ViewItem.aspx?ParamId=72). (In Russian) 

Sultanov A.R. Deputatskij zapros v Konstitutsionnom Sude RF protiv ispolnenija postanovlenij Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka [Deputy Request to the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation against the Execution of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights]. Zakonodatel’stvo i jekonomika = Legislation and Economy, 2015, no. 7, pp. 7–15. (In Russian) 

Sultanov A.R. A naposledok ja skazhu... [And Finally I Say...]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2015, no. 4, pp. 296–303. (In Russian) 

Zor’kin V.D. Predel ustupchivosti [Limit of Compliance] (http://www.coe.mid.ru/ doc/Zorkin.htm). (In Russian) 

Sultanov A.R. Bor’ba za pravo obzhalovanija sudebnogo reshenija [The Struggle for the Right to Appeal a Judicial Decision]. Moscow, 2014. (In Russian) 

Sultanov A.R. Bor’ba za pravovuju opredelennost’ ili poisk spravedlivosti [The Struggle for Legal Certainty or the Search for Justice]. Moscow, 2015. (In Russian) 

Poljakov S.B. Printsip vzaimnoj otvetstvennosti gosudarstva i lichnosti: teoretikopravovye i prikladnye aspekty [The Principle of Mutual Responsibility of the State and the Individual: Theoretical and Applied Aspects]: Dissertation … Doctor of Legal Sciences. Nizhnij Novgorod, 2011, p. 44. (In Russian) 

Poljakov S.B. Pravonarushitel’ – organ sudebnoj vlasti? [Is the Offender the Judicial Authority?]. Rossijskij sud’ja = Russian Judge, 2010, no. 9, pp. 26–30. (In Russian) 

Sultanov A.R. Motivirovannost’ sudebnogo akta kak odna iz osnovnyh problem spravedlivogo pravosudija [Motivation of a Judicial Act as One of the Main Problems of Fair Justice]. Zakon = Law, 2014, no. 8, pp. 114–118. (In Russian) 

Sultanov A.R. O probleme motivirovannosti sudebnyh aktov cherez prizmu postanovlenij ESPCh [On the Issue of Motivation of Judicial Decisions in the Light of Judgments of the ECHR]. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo = International Public and Private Law, 2008, no. 2, pp. 11–13. (In Russian) 

Sultanov A.R. Evropejskie pravovye standarty: uroki istorii i pravoprimenitel’naja praktika [European Legal Standards: Lessons of History and Practice]. Moscow, 2012, pp. 91–97. (In Russian) 

Ponomarenko V.A. Motivirovannost’ sudebnogo reshenija v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Motivation of a Judgment in Civil and Arbitration Procedure]. St. Petersburg, 2009, p. 91. (In Russian) 

Afanas’ev S.F. Pravo na poluchenie motivirovannogo sudebnogo reshenija po grazhdanskomu delu (mezhdunarodnyj i natsional’nyj aspekty) [The Right to Receiving a Motivated Decision in a Civil Case (International and National Aspects)]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2008, no. 12, pp. 13–16. (In Russian) 

Rabtsevich O.I. Pravo na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel’stvo: mezhdunarodnoe i vnutrigosudarstvennoe pravovoe regulirovanie [The Right to a Fair Trial: International and National Legal Regulation]. Moscow, 2005, p. 136. (In Russian) 

Zagajnova S.K. Sudebnye akty v mehanizme realizatsii sudebnoj vlasti v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Judicial Acts in the Mechanism of Implementation of the Judicial Authority in Civil and Arbitration Procedure]. Moscow, 2007, pp. 299–300. (In Russian) Zajtsev I.M. Reshenie suda kak protsessual’nyj document [The Court’s Decision as a Procedural Document]. Vestnik SGAP = Herald of SGAP, 1995, no. 2, p. 74. (In Russian) 

Tuzov N.A. Motivirovanie i prejuditsija sudebnyh aktov [Motivating and Prejudice of Judicial Acts]. Moscow, 2006. (In Russian) 

Vasjaev A.A., Knjaz’kin S.A. Motivirovannost’ sudebnyh reshenij – standart Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [Motivation of Judgments is the Standard of the European Court of Human Rights]. Advokat = Lawyer, 2013, no. 6, pp. 27–32. (In Russian) 

Musin V.A. Sudebnaja zashchita: sootnoshenie vnutrigosudarstvennogo i mezhgosudarstvennogo pravosudija [Judicial Protection: the Ratio of Domestic and Transnational Justice]. (http://www.ksrf.ru/ru/Info/Reading/Pages/PerformanceMysin.aspx). (In Russian) 

Sultanov A.R. Uchet postanovlenij Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF i postanovlenij ESPCh v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Consideration of Judgments of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and Judgments of the ECHR in the Civil Procedure]. Prolog = Prologue, 2013, no. 2 (2), pp. 34–40. (In Russian) 

Information about the author 

Sultanov A.R. (Nizhnekamsk) – Head of the Legal Department of the PJSC «Nizhnekamskneftekhim» (423574, Tatarstan Republic, Nizhnekamsk, PJSC «Nizhnekamskneftekhim »; e-mail: [email protected]).