Наши индексы цитирования:
О дискреционных полномочиях должностных лиц Верховного Суда РФ в гражданском и арбитражном процессах
М.Ш. Папация,
доктор юридических наук, партнер НП «Первая коллегия адвокатов г. Москвы»,
ведущий научный сотрудник ФБГУ «Российский государственный университет правосудия»
Вопрос о дискреционных полномочиях должностных лиц судов современной России стал предметом обсуждения в отечественной юридической литературе в связи с правовой позицией Европейского суда по правам человека, который отрицательно оценил полномочия председателей (и заместителей) судов субъектов РФ на принесение протеста в надзорном порядке. С того времени минуло немало лет, схожие полномочия должностных лиц Верховного Суда РФ закреплены в нормах ГПК РФ и АПК РФ. По этой проблеме специальные публикации отсутствуют, встречаются лишь отдельные суждения. Осмысление являющихся предметом данной статьи дискреционных полномочий должностных лиц Верховного Суда РФ, предусмотренных ч. 3 ст. 381, ч. 3 ст. 391.5 и ст. 391.11 ГПК РФ и ч. 8 ст. 291.6, ч. 7 ст. 308.4 и ст. 308.10 АПК РФ, важно как для законодателя, так и для судебного правоприменения. Для первого это имеет значение в аспекте внедрения правового регулирования, корреспондирующего требованиям Конституции РФ в ее понимании Конституционным Судом РФ и Конвенции по защите прав человека и основных свобод в ее толковании Европейским судом по правам человека. Для второго это актуально тогда, в частности, когда законодатель не только не отказывается от наделения должностных лиц Верховного Суда РФ вызывающими сомнения дискреционными полномочиями, поначалу появившимися в гражданском процессе, но, напротив, внедряет их и в арбитражный процесс. Между тем есть необходимость в обобщении существующих правовых подходов Европейского суда по правам человека, Конституционного Суда РФ, процессуальной доктрины, выявлении наиболее актуальных аспектов проблемы и рассмотрении возможных вариантов их урегулирования.
References
Fasmer M. Jetimologicheskij slovar’ russkogo jazyka [Etymological Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Moscow, 1964–1973, vol. 1–4. (In Russian)
Sovetskij jenciklopedicheskij slovar’ [Soviet Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow, 1979, p. 400. (In Russian)
Kalmykova E.A Vidy diskretsionnyh polnomochij suda v arbitrazhnom protsesse [Types of Discretionary Powers of the Court in Arbitral Procedure]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitral and Civil Procedure, 2011, no. 3. (In Russian)
Anishina V. Diskretsionnye polnomochija sudov kak garantija samostojatel’nosti i jeffektivnosti sudebnoj vlasti [Discretionary Powers of Courts as a Guarantee of the Independence and Effectiveness of the Judiciary]. Mirovoj sud’ja = Magistrate, 2008, no. 3, 4. (In Russian)
Sultanov A.R. Problema protivostojanija protsessual’nym zloupotreblenijam v voprosah podsudnosti [The Problem of Confrontation to Procedural Abuses in Questions of Jurisdiction]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2014, no. 6. (In Russian) Sultanov A.R. Zhazhda spravedlivosti: bor’ba za sud [The Thirst for Justice: the Struggle for Court]. Moscow, 2014. (In Russian)
Chekmareva A.V. Predvaritel’noe izuchenie kassatsionnoj zhaloby (predstavlenija) kak etap kassatsionnogo proizvodstva [A Preliminary Study of Cassation Appeal as a Stage of the Cassation Proceedings]. Sovremennoe pravo = Contemporary Law, 2014, no. 11. (In Russian)
Kapitsyn V.M. Gosudarstvennaja diskretsija kak problema konstitutsionnogo prava [State Discretion as a Problem of Constitutional Law]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo = Constitutional and Municipal Law, 2006, no. 3. (In Russian)
Kleandrov M.I.; Slavin M.M. (ed.). Status sud’i: pravovoj i smezhnye komponenty [Status of a Judge: Legal and Related Components]. Moscow, 2008. (In Russian)
Gromova N.V. Vidy sudejskogo usmotrenija pri sovershenii protsessual’nyh dejstvij [Types of Judicial Discretion in the Commission in Legal Proceedings]. Arbitrazhnaja praktika = Arbitration Practice, 2002, no. 3. (In Russian)
Papkova O.A. Usmotrenie suda [The Judicial Discretion]. Moscow, 2005. (In Russian)
Barak A. Sudejskoe usmotrenie [The Judicial Discretion]. Moscow, 1999. (In Russian)
Bonner A.T. Primenenie zakona i sudebnoe usmotrenie [The Application of the Law and the Judicial Discretion]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo = The Soviet State and Law, 1979, no. 6. (In Russian)
Komissarov K.I. Sudebnoe usmotrenie v grazhdanskom protsesse [Judicial Discretion in Civil Procedure]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo = The Soviet State and Law, 1969, no. 4. (In Russian)
Ershov V.V. Sudebnoe pravoprimenenie (teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy) [Judicial Enforcement (Theoretical and Practical Problems)]. Moscow, 1991. (In Russian)
Vahitov R.S., Sevast’janova E.V. Sudejskoe usmotrenie i nekotorye problemy ego realizatsii [The Judicial Discretion and Some Problems of Its Implementation]. Arbitrazhnaja praktika = Arbitral Practice, 2002, no. 6. (In Russian)
Berg O.V. Voprosy sudejskogo usmotrenija v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsessah [Questions of the Judicial Discretion in Civil and Arbitral Procedure]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitral and Civil Procedure, 2000, no. 2. (In Russian)
Berg L.N. Problema sudebnogo usmotrenija v aspekte komparativistiki [The Problem of the Judicial Discretion in Terms of Comparative]. Akademicheskij juridicheskij zhurnal = Academic Law Journal, 2007, no. 4 (30). (In Russian)
Maljushin A.A. Konstitutsionno-sudebnoe pravotvorchestvo v pravovom gosudarstve [Constitutional-Judicial Law-Making in the State of Law]. Moscow, 2006. (In Russian)
Teljatnikov V.I. Ubezhdenie sud’i [The Persuading of a Judge]. St. Petersburg, 2004. (In Russian)
Gromoshina N.A. K voprosu ob ob’edinenii vysshih sudov i Kodekse administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva [To the Issue of Unification of Higher Courts and the Administrative Court Proceeding Code]. Rossijskaja justitsija = Russian Justice, 2014, no. 1. (In Russian)
Kovtun N.N. Apelljatsionnoe, kassatsionnoe i nadzornoe proizvodstvo po ugolovnym delam v kontekste sootvetstvija mezhdunarodno-pravovomu standartu [Appeal, Cassational and Supervisory Review Proceedings in Criminal Cases in the Context of Relevant International Legal Standards]. Mezhdunarodnoe ugolovnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnaja justitsija = International Criminal Law and International Justice, 2012, no. 3. (In Russian)
Balashova I.N. Problemy peresmotra sudebnyh postanovlenij v porjadke nadzora v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Problems of Revision of Judgments by Way of Supervision in Civil Proceedings]: Abstract of Dissertation … Candidate of Legal Sciences. Saratov, 2004. (In Russian)
Rehtina I.V. Ob unifikatsii norm, regulirujushchih proizvodstvo v porjadke nadzora v grazhdanskom protsesse [About the Unification of Rules Governing Production in the Order of Supervision in Civil Procedure]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2006, no. 10. (In Russian)
Parfir’ev D.N. Jeffektivnoe nadzornoe proizvodstvo v grazhdanskom protsesse: byt’ ili ne byt’? [Effective Supervisory Review Proceedings in Civil Procedure: to Be or not to Be?]. Rossijskaja justitsija = Russian Justice, 2011, no. 10. (In Russian)
Terehova L.A. Sistema peresmotra sudebnyh reshenij v GPK RF [The System of Review of Judicial Decisions in the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2012, no. 3. (In Russian)
Kurpas M.V. O sootvetstvii predlozhennoj zakonodatelem protsedury dostupa v sud nadzornoj instantsii mezhdunarodno-pravovym i konstitutsionnym printsipam sudoproizvodstva [About the Conformity of the Proposed by the Legislator Procedure of Access to the Court of Supervisory Review to International Law and Constitutional Principles of Justice]. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo = International Public and Private Law, 2011, no. 3. (In Russian)
Borisova E.A. O garantijah sudebnoj zashchity na stadijah apelljatsionnoj, nadzornoj proverki sudebnyh reshenij [About Guarantees of Judicial Protection on Stages of Appeal, Supervisory Review of Court Decisions]. Juridicheskij mir = Juridical World, 2006, no. 4. (In Russian)
Borisova E.A. Proverka sudebnyh aktov po grazhdanskim delam [Verification of Judicial Decisions in Civil Cases]. Moscow, 2005. (In Russian)
Kiselev A. Grazhdanskij protsess: illjuzija sveta v kontse tonnelja [Civil Proceedings: the Illusion of the Light at the End of the Tunnel]. System «ConsultantPlus». (In Russian)
Yarkov V.V. Novelly GPK RF: «Novoe vino v starye meha»? [Novels of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: «New Wine in Old Bottles»?]. Juridicheskaja gazeta = Juridical Newspaper, 2011, 12 may. (In Russian)
Sultanov A.R. Pravovaja opredelennost’ v nadzornom proizvodstve GPK RF i praktika Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF [Legal Certainty in Supervisory Review of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the Practice of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Pravo i politika = Law and Politics, 2007, no. 5. (In Russian)
Rehtina I.V. Izmenenija Grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federatsii v oblasti obzhalovanija sudebnyh postanovlenij [Changes of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in the Area of Appeals of Judicial Decisions]. Jurist = Lawyer, 2011, no. 9. (In Russian)
Azarov V.V. Pravo na obrashchenie v sud i ego realizatsija pri obrashchenii v arbitrazhnye sudy vyshestojashchih instantsij [The Right to Appeal to the Court and Its Implementation at the Reference in Arbitration Courts of Superior Authorities]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitral and Civil Procedure, 2003, no. 12. (In Russian)
Efimov A.E. Ob unifikatsii nadzornyh proizvodstv v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsessah [About the Unification of Supervisory Review in Civil and Arbitral Procedure]. Sovremennoe pravo = Contemporary Law, 2005, no. 6. (In Russian)
Efimov A.E. Nadzornoe proizvodstvo v arbitrazhnom processe [Supervisory Review in Arbitral Procedure]. Moscow, 2007. (In Russian)
Nikonorov S. Zadachi i tseli stadii proverki sudebnyh postanovlenij v porjadke nadzora v grazhdanskom protsesse [Goals and Objectives of the Stage of Test of Judicial Decisions in Order of Review Proceedings in Civil Procedure]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitral and Civil Procedure, 2004, no. 2. (In Russian)
Zhujkov V.M. Sudebnaja reforma: problemy dostupa k pravosudiju [Judicial Reform: Problems of Access to Justice]. Moscow, 2006. (In Russian)
Terehova L.A. Nadzornoe proizvodstvo v grazhdanskom protsesse: problemy razvitija i sovershenstvovanija [Supervisory Review in Civil Procedure: Problems of Development and Improvement]. Moscow, 2009. (In Russian)
Knjaz’kin S. Osobennosti novogo sudebnogo nadzora [Features of the New Judicial Review]. ezh-Jurist = ezh-Lawyer, 2011, no. 50. (In Russian)
Afanas’ev D.V. Podacha zhaloby v Evropejskij sud po pravam cheloveka [Filing a Complaint in the European Court of Human Rights]. Moscow, 2012, vol. 1. (In Russian)
Borisova E.A. Razvitie norm GPK RF o proverke i peresmotre sudebnyh postanovlenij: teorija i praktika [Development of Standards of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation on the Audit and Review of Judicial Decisions: Theory and Practice]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2013, no. 4. (In Russian)
Neshataeva T.N. Sud i zashchita prav i svobod grazhdan Rossijskoj Federatsii [The Court and the Protection of Rights and Freedoms of Citizens of the Russian Federation]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie = Comparative Constitutional Review, 2004, no. 4 (49). (In Russian)
Barsukova V.N. Nadzornoe proizvodstvo v grazhdanskom protsesse v svete reformy proverochnyh instantsij [Supervisory Review in Civil Procedure in the Light of the Reform of Test Instances]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitral and Civil Procedure, 2012, no. 9. (In Russian).
Krasheninnikov P.V. (ed.). Postatejnyj kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federatsii [Itemized Commentary on the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, 2012. (In Russian).
Rehtina I.V. Osobennosti obzhalovanija vstupivshih v zakonnuju silu sudebnyh postanovlenij v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve Rossii i otdel’nyh gosudarstv Evropy [Features of Appeal Entered into Legal Force of Court Orders in Civil Proceedings of Russia and Certain Countries of Europe]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitral and Civil Procedure, 2013, no. 11. (In Russian)
Borisova E.A. (ed.). Proverka sudebnyh postanovlenij v grazhdanskom processe stran ES i SNG: Monografija [Verification of Judgments in Civil Procedure of the EU and the CIS: Monograph]. Moscow, 2007. (In Russian)
Zhujkov V.M. (ed.). Praktika primenenija Grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo kodeksa Rossijskoj Federatsii: Prakticheskoe posobie [The Practical Application of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: A Practical Guide]. Moscow, 2005. (In Russian)
Sentsov I.A. GPK RF: desjat’ let v dvizhenii (analiz izmenenij i dopolnenij s 2003 po 2013 g.) [The Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: Ten Years (Analysis of Changes and Additions from 2003 to 2013)]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2013, no. 4. (In Russian)
Rehtina I.V. Ob unifikatsii norm, regulirujushchih proizvodstvo v porjadke nadzora v grazhdanskom protsesse [About the Unification of Rules Governing Production in the Order of Review Proceedings in Civil Procedure]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2006, no. 10. (In Russian)
Vishnevskij G.A. Dejstvie printsipa res judicata kak neobhodimoe uslovie obespechenija spravedlivosti [Action of the Principle of Res Judicata as a Necessary Condition of Ensuring Justice]. Sovremennoe pravo = Contemporary Law, 2013, no. 11. (In Russian)
Novoselov V.I. Pravovoe polozhenie grazhdan v sovetskom gosudarstvennom upravlenii [The Legal Status of Citizens of the Soviet State Administration]. Saratov, 1976. (In Russian)
Zajtsev I.M. Ustranenie oshibok v grazhdanskom protsesse [Troubleshooting in Civil Procedure]. Saratov, 1985. (In Russian)
Kats S.Ju. Sudebnyj nadzor v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Judicial Review in Civil Proceedings]. Moscow, 1980. (In Russian)
Ljublinskij P.I. Sudejskoe usmotrenie [The Judicial Discretion]. Zhurnal Ministerstva justitsii = Journal of the Ministry of Justice, 1904, no. 10. (In Russian)
Abushenko D.B. Sudebnoe usmotrenie v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [The Judicial Discretion in Civil and Arbitral Procedure]. Moscow, 2002. (In Russian)
Ermakova K.P. Ponjatie i sub’ektivnye predely sudebnogo usmotrenija [The Concept and Subjective Limits of the Judicial Discretion]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2009, no. 8. (In Russian)
Bojko D.V. Pravoprimenitel’noe usmotrenie, zakonnost’ i proizvol [Enforcement Discretion, the Lawfulness and Arbitrariness]. Obshchestvo i pravo = Society and Law, 2009, no. 3. (In Russian)
Lozovskaja S.V. Sootnoshenie sudejskogo usmotrenija i sudejskogo pravotvorchestva [The Ratio of the Judicial Discretion and the Judicial Lawmaking]. Rossijskij sud’ja = Russian Judge, 2012, no. 9. (In Russian)
Makarihina O.A. K voprosu o sudebnom usmotrenii v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [To the Issue of the Judicial Discretion in Civil and Arbitral Procedure]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitral and Civil Procedure, 2014, no. 6. (In Russian)
Zhujkov V.M., Treushnikov M.K. (eds.). Kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoj Federatsii (postatejnyj) [Commentary on the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (Itemized)]. Moscow, 2007. (In Russian)
Information about the author
Patsatsia M.Sh. (Moscow) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Partner of the NP «The First Bar of Moscow», Leading Researcher of the Russian University of Justice (117418, Moscow, Novocheriomushkinskaya St., 69; e-mail: [email protected]).
М.Ш. Пацация
Реклама
Наши партнеры
