Е.А. Попкова, 

помощник юриста адвокатского бюро 

«Хаустов, Ященко и Партнеры» 

В статье проводится анализ гармонизации гражданского процесса. Рассмотрены отличительные особенности гармонизации и унификации гражданского процесса, а также виды и средства гармонизации. Известно, что процесс сближения правовых систем существует со времен рецепции римского права европейскими государствами, однако сам термин «гармонизация» появился сравнительно недавно и в настоящее время представляет научный интерес. Анализ отличительных черт гармонизации гражданского процесса позволил сформулировать понятие гармонизации гражданского процесса. Гармонизация есть либо предшествующая стадия унификации единого процесса по сближению процессуальных систем, которая позволяет совершить основополагающие преобразования в гражданском процессе с целью их дальнейшей модификации в сторону полной тождественности в праве, либо самостоятельный процесс сближения гражданского процесса. 

Ключевые слова: гражданский процесс; гармонизация гражданского процесса; унификация гражданского процесса; виды гармонизации; средства гармонизации.

References

 

Achieving the Harmonization of the Transnational Civil Procedure: Will the ALI/ UNIDROIT Project Succeed? (http://mcauleyhawach.com.au/achieving-theharmonization- of-transnational-civil-procedure-will-the-ali-unidroit-projectsucceed/# more-103). 

ALI/UNIDROIT. Principles of Transnational Civil Procedure. Cambridge University Press, 2006. 

Del Duca L.F. Developing Global Transnational Harmonization Procedures for the Twenty-First Century: The Accelerating Pace of Common and Civil Law Convergence. Texas International Law Journal, 2007, vol. 42, no. 3, p. 628. 

Goldstein St. The Proposed ALI/UNIDROIT Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure: the Utility of Such a Harmonization Project. Uniform Law Review, 2001, vol. 6, p. 797. 

Hazard G.C., Jr. International «Harmonization» of Procedural Law. In Global Issues of Civil Procedure by T.O. Main. 2006, p. 13. 

Joshi R.M. International Business.Oxford University Press, New Delhi and New York, 2009, p. 122. 

Koh H.H. Why Transnational Law Matters. Penn State International Law Review, 2006, vol. 24, p. 747. 

Lindblom P.H. Harmony of Legal Speres. A Swedish View on the Construction of Unified European Procedual Law. European Review of Private Law, 1997, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 11–46. 

Mikelenas V. The Proposed ALI/UNIDROIT Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedure and the New Code of Civil Procedure in Lithuania. Uniform Law Review, 2001, vol. 4, p. 988. 

Shaffer G. Transnational Legal Process and State Charge. Law & Social Inquiry, 2012, vol. 37, no. 2, p. 231. 

Storme M. (ed.) Approximation of Judiciary Law in the European Union. In Rapprochement du Droit Judiciare de l’Unioneuropeene. Kluver, Dordrect, 1994, p. 61. 

Van Rhee C.H. Harmonisation of Civil Procedure: An Historical and Comparative Perspective. Faculty of Law Maastricht University, 2011, Working Paper No. 2011/28, p. 1. 

Van Rhee C.H., Verkerk R. Civil Procedure. In Smits J.M. (ed.). Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law. Cheltenham. 2006, p. 127. 

Voet St., Gidi A. Civil Procedure in Cross-Cultural Dialogue: Eurasia Context. Russian Law Journal, 2014, vol. III, no. 1, p. 132. 

Ber F. Unifitsirovannoe i garmonizirovannoe Evropejskoe pravo i ego vlijanie na tret’i gosudarstva [Unified and Harmonized European Law and Its Impact on Third States]. Baltijskij region = The Baltic Sea Region, 2011, no. 3(9), p. 14. (In Russian) 

Van Rhee C.H. Garmonizatsija grazhdanskogo protsessa v global’nom masshtabe [Harmonisation of Civil Procedure on a Global Scale]. In Evropejskij grazhdanskij protsess i ispolnitel’noe proizvodstvo: Sbornik materialov Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoprakticheskoj konferentsii [European Civil Procedure and Enforcement Proceedings: Collection of Papers of the International Scientific and Practical Conference]. Moscow, 2012, p. 20. (In Russian) 

Vebinar s uchastiem E.A. Suhanova «Novaja redaktsija glavy 4 «Juridicheskie litsa» GK RF» [Webinar Featuring E.A. Sukhanov «The New Version of the Chapter 4 «Legal Entities» of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation»] (http://www.lawyercom.ru/ uracademy/video-lectures/novaya-redakcziya-glavyi-4-gk-rf). (In Russian) 

Grotsij G. Tri knigi o prave vojny i mira [Three Books on the Law of War and Peace]. In Volosnkova L.M. (ed.). Istorija politicheskih i pravovyh uchenij: Hrestomatija. Ch. 1 [History of Political and Legal Doctrines: A Reader. Part 1]. Tjumen’, 1999, p. 343. (In Russian) Ermakova E.P. Unifikatsija grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava i mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava v Evropejskom sojuze: Uchebnoe posobie [Unification of Civil Procedure Law and Private International Law in the European Union: A Textbook]. Moscow, 2014, pp. 16–17. (In Russian) 

Lejst O.Je. (ed.). Istorija politicheskih i pravovyh uchenij [History of Political and Legal Teachings]. Moscow, 1997, pp. 53–58. (In Russian) Nersesjants B.C. Filosofija prava [Philosophy of Law]. Moscow, 1997, pp. 416–418. (In Russian) 

Koval’kova E.Ju. K voprosu o sblizhenii i garmonizatsii zakonodatel’stv [To the Question on Approximation and Harmonization of Legal Systems]. Vneshnetorgovoe pravo = The Foreign Trade Law, 2011, no. 5, pp. 28–31. (In Russian) 

Komarov V. Grazhdanskij protsess v global’nom masshtabe [Civil Process on a Global Scale]. Pravo Ukrainy = Law of Ukraine, 2011, no. 9–10, p. 291. (In Russian) 

Krymskij D.I. Garmonizatsija grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva v stranah Evropejskogo Sojuza: dostignutye rezul’taty i perspektivy razvitija [Harmonisation of Civil Justice in the European Union: Progress and Prospects of Development]. Rossijskij ezhegodnik grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessa = Russian Yearbook of Civil and Arbitration Procedure, 2008–2009, no. 7, p. 220. (In Russian) 

Ljubchenko M.Ja. Vzaimodejstvie Evropejskogo suda i natsional’nyh jurisdiktsij: evropejskij vzgljad na garmonizatsiju protsessa [Interaction between the European Court and National Jurisdictions: A European Perspective on Harmonization of Process]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitrate and Civil Procedure, 2014, no. 1, p. 24. (In Russian) 

Maleshin D.Ja. Osnovnoj doklad [Keynote Speech]. In Maleshin D.Ja. (ed.). Grazhdanskij protsess v mezhkul’turnom dialoge: evrazijskij kontekst: Vsemirnaja konferentsija Mezhdunarodnoj assotsiatsii protsessual’nogo prava, 18–21 sentjabrja 2012 g., Moskva, Rossija: Sbornik dokladov [Civil Process in Intercultural Dialogue: Eurasian Context: The World Conference of the International Association of Procedural Law, 18–21 September 2012, Moscow, Russia: Collection of Reports]. Moscow, 2012, p. 280. (In Russian) 

Maleshin D.Ja. Individualistskaja model’ prava Rossii [Individualistic Model of Law in Russia]. Izvestija vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Pravovedenie = News of Higher Schools. Jurisprudence, 2007, no. 6, p. 23. (In Russian) 

Marchenko M.N. Istochniki prava: Uchebnoe posobie [Sources of Law: A Textbook]. Moscow, 2008, p. 79. (In Russian) 

Marysheva N.I. Gaagskaja konventsija 1 marta 1954 g. po voprosam grazhdanskogo protsessa i ee primenenie v SSSR [The Hague Convention of 1 March 1954 on Civil Procedure and Its Application in the USSR]. In Buloshnikov M.Ja., Gringol’ts I.A., Kirichenko M.G. and others (eds.). Uchenye zapiski Vsesojuznogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta sovetskogo zakonodatel’stva. Vyp. 17 [Scientific Notes of the All-Union Scientific Research Institute of Soviet Legislation. Issue 17]. Moscow, 1969, pp. 110– 111. (In Russian) 

Dmitrieva G.K. (ed.). Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: Uchebnik [Private International Law: A Textbook]. Moscow, 2004, p. 112. (In Russian) Marchenko M.N. (ed.). Obshchaja teorija gosudarstva i prava: Akademicheskij kurs. V 3 t. [The General Theory of State and Law: An Academic Course. In 3 vol.]. Moscow, 2002, vol. 2, p. 293. (In Russian) 

Tarhov V.A. Rimskoe chastnoe pravo: Uchebnoe posobie [Roman Private Law: A Textbook]. Saratov, 2003, pp. 14–20. (In Russian) 

Isaev D.A. Osnovnye teorii garmonizatsii zakonodatel’stva v protsesse formirovanija obshchih prostranstv Rossija – ES [Basic Theory of Harmonization of Legislation in the Process of Formation of Common Spaces Russia – EU] (http://www.recep.ru/files/ documents/harmonization_isaev_rus.pdf). (In Russian) 

Terehov V.V. Garmonizatsija grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava: problemy i perspektivy [Harmonization of Civil Procedure Law: Problems and Prospects]. In World & Science: Materials of the International Research and Practice Conference. Brno, Czech Republic, 1 May 2014, p. 39. (In Russian) 

Tolkovyj slovar’ Ozhegova [Ozhegov’s Explanatory Dictionary] (http://www.ozhegovwords. com/word/3042). (In Russian) 

Yarkov V.V. Osnovnoj doklad. Garmonizatsija grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava v stranah Evrazii skvoz’ prizmu grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva na postsovetskom prostranstve [Keynote Speech. Harmonization of Civil Procedure Law in Countries of Eurasia through the Prism of Civil Justice in the Postsoviet Area]. In Maleshin D.Ja. (ed.). Grazhdanskij protsess v mezhkul’turnom dialoge: evrazijskij kontekst: Vsemirnaja konferentsija Mezhdunarodnoj assotsiatsii protsessual’nogo prava, 18–21 sentjabrja 2012 g., Moskva, Rossija: Sbornik dokladov [Civil Process in Intercultural Dialogue: Eurasian Context: The World Conference of the International Association of Procedural Law, 18–21 September 2012, Moscow, Russia: Collection of Reports]. Moscow, 2012, p. 400. (In Russian) 

Information about the author 

Popkova E.A. (Moscow) – Lawyer Assistant in the Lawyer Bureau «Khaustov, Yashchenko and Partners» (129515, Moscow, Academician Korolev st., 11, 6; e-mail: [email protected]).