Р.О. Опалев, 

кандидат юридических наук, доцент кафедры гражданского процесса 

Уральской государственной юридической академии, зам. начальника отдела анализа 

и обобщения судебной практики Федерального арбитражного суда Уральского округа

В статье автором раскрывается действие института признания фактов в арбитражном процессе Российской Федерации. 

Ключевые слова: арбитражный процесс; судебное разбирательство.

   Kleandrov M.I. Arbitration process: A Textbook. M., 2006. Р. 213. 

   Sherstyuk V.M. Commentary on the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation / Ed. by v.F. Yakovlev, M.K. Yukov. M., 2003. Р. 383. 

  Zagidullin M.R. Arbitration Process: A textbook for university / Ed. by J.F. Farhtdinova and other. St. Petersburg, 2004. Р. 220.   

 Reshetnikovа I.V. Evidentiary law of England and the United States. Ekaterinburg, 1997. Р. 25. 

  Charter of Civil Procedure: with alphabetical index, compiled by barrister M.v. Berenshtam and v.N. Novikov. St. Petersburg, 1909. Р. 91–92. 

  Nefed’ev E.A. Textbook of Russian civil proceedings. Krasnodar, 2005. Р. 256–257. 

 Yarkov V.V. Legal facts in the mechanism of implementation of the rules of civil procedure law: Dissertation. Doctor of Legal Sciences. Ekaterinburg, 1992. Р. 83. 

  Afanasiev S.F. On the relation between the recognized and unchallenged facts, as well as implicative actions in civil proceedings (for example, Section 3.1 of Article 70 of the APC) // Lawyer. 2010. No. 10.

  Krasavchikov O.A. Legal facts of Soviet civil law. M., 1958. P. 101–103. 

  Barikhin A.B. Great Encyclopedic Dictionary of Law. M., 2002. Р. 247. 

  Shemeneva O.N. Uncontested facts in the arbitration process // Arbitration Civil Procedure. 2011. No. 2. 

  Burnham W. The legal system of the United States. 3rd ed. M.: «New Justice», 2007. Р. 385–407. 

  Nefed’ev E.A. Textbook of Russian civil proceedings. Krasnodar, 2005. Р. 255. 

  Vaskovsky E.V. Textbook of civil procedure. § 21. Dispositive (ATP «ConsultantPlus»). 

  Kurylev S.V. Explanations of the parties as evidence of Soviet civil proceedings. M., 1956. Р. 113–142. 

  Puchinsky V.K. Recognition of the Soviet civil proceedings. M., 1955. Р. 19–26. 

  Yudelson K.S. Favorites: The Soviet notary. The problem of proof in the Soviet civil proceedings. M., 2005. Р. 518–524. 

 Civil Procedure Russia: Textbook / Ed. by M.A. vikut. M., 2005. Р. 183 (the authors of the relevant chapter – I.M. Zaitsev, S.F. Afanasyev). Osokina G.L. Civil proceedings. The general part. M., 2006. S. 598. 

 Civil Procedural Law: Textbook / Ed. by M.S. Shakaryan. M., 2007. Р. 183 (the author of the relevant chapter – A.K. Sergun).   

 Treushnikov M.K. Forensic evidence. M., 2004. Р. 163–164. 

  Civil Procedure: Textbook / Ed. by v.v. Yarkov. M., 2006. Р. 231. 

  Bonner A.T. Probative value of the conduct of parties in civil and arbitration processes // Act. 2009. No. 2. Р. 101–112. 

  Kurylev S.V. Explanations of the parties as evidence of Soviet civil proceedings. M., 1956. Р. 122.

 Information about the author 

    Opalev R.O. (Ekaterinburg) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Ural State Law Academy, Deputy Chief of Analysis and Generalization of Judicial Practice at the Federal Arbitration Court of the Ural District (620137, Sverdlovsk region, Ekaterinburg city, Komsomolskaya st., 21, e-mail: [email protected]).