Наши индексы цитирования:
СВОБОДА СТОРОН ДОГОВОРА В ПРИМЕНЕНИИ ПОСЛЕДСТВИЙ ЕГО НЕДЕЙСТВИТЕЛЬНОСТИ: В ПОИСКАХ НАДЛЕЖАЩЕГО ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНОГО ОФОРМЛЕНИЯ
СВОБОДА СТОРОН ДОГОВОРА
В ПРИМЕНЕНИИ ПОСЛЕДСТВИЙ ЕГО НЕДЕЙСТВИТЕЛЬНОСТИ:
В ПОИСКАХ НАДЛЕЖАЩЕГО ПРОЦЕССУАЛЬНОГО
ОФОРМЛЕНИЯ
В.А. ГОНЧАРОВА,
аспирантка кафедры гражданского права Юридического института
Томского государственного университета
DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2019-9-5-205-229
Одним из важных нововведений реформы гражданского законодательства 2015 г.
является установление особых правил о последствиях недействительности догово-
ров, заключенных лицами, осуществляющими предпринимательскую деятельность
(п. 3 ст. 431.1 ГК РФ). Несмотря на высказываемую в юридической литературе пози-
тивную оценку введенного законоположения, представляется, что содержание п. 3
ст. 431.1 ГК РФ не соответствует ни экономической природе недействительных сде-
лок (в части возможности применения «иных» последствий недействительности),
ни действующему гражданскому процессуальному и арбитражному процессуальному
законодательству (в части возможности заключения такого соглашения после при-
знания сделки недействительной). В этой связи в рамках настоящей статьи пред-
лагается новая редакция правила п. 3 ст. 431.1 ГК РФ, предусматривающая право
субъектов гражданского права на заключение соглашений о порядке исполнения обя-
зательств, возникающих из заключенного между ними, но позже признанного недей-
ствительным договора. При этом в качестве наиболее приемлемого процессуального
оформления такого договора выступает мировое соглашение (ст. 173 ГПК РФ, гл. 15
АПК РФ). Последнее представляется суду при рассмотрении им требований о при-
знании сделки недействительной и о применении последствий ее недействитель-
ности сторонами в случае принятия судом решения о недействительности сделки
и утверждается определением, выносимым одновременно с таким решением.
Ключевые слова: мировое соглашение; последствия недействительности сделки;
недействительная сделка; обязательность решений суда; диспозитивность; сво-
бода договора; процессуальная форма; исполнительное производство.
References
Abushenko D.B. Agreement on Restitutional Consequences: Reflections About Procedural
Mechanisms for the Implementation of the Legal Structure. Bulletin of Economic
Justice of the Russian Federation, 2018, no. 12. (In Russian)
Abushenko D.B. Problems of the Mutual Influence of Judicial Acts and Legal Facts of
Substantive Law in Civil Procedure: Thesis for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences. Yekaterinburg,
2014. (In Russian)
Abushenko D.B. Problems of the Mutual Influence of Judicial Acts and Legal Facts
of Substantive Law in Civil Procedure: Monograph. Tver: Kondratiev A.N., 2013. (In
Russian)
Ageev A.Kh. The Legal Nature of the Settlement Agreement in Enforcement Proceedings.
Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2003, no. 12. (In Russian)
Bychkov A.I. Defects, Mistakes, and Troubles. Moscow: Infotropik Media, 2017.
(In Russian)
Fomicheva O.V. The Principle of Full Compensation of Losses and Its Implementation
in Russian Civil Law: Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences. Saratov,
2001. (In Russian)
Gadzhiev G.A. Legitimation of the Ideas of “Law and Economics” (New Cognitive
Structures for Civil Law). Civil Law Review, 2017, no. 6. (In Russian)
Goncharova V.A. Compensation of Damages as a Consequence of the Invalidity of
the Bargain: Problems of Civil Law Doctrine. Property Relations in the Russian Federation,
2018, no. 10. (In Russian)
Goncharova V.A. Essential Approach to the Grounds of Invalidity of Gargains. Bulletin
of the Omsk Law Academy, 2018, no. 3. (In Russian)
Grigorieva T.A., Shcherbakova L.G. The Principle of Disposition in Enforcement
Proceedings. In Valeev D.Kh., Chelyshev M.Yu. (eds.). Enforcement Proceedings: Collection
of Materials of the All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference. Moscow: Statut,
2009. (In Russian)
Gruzdev V.V. Concerted Actions in Civil Law. Law and Economics, 2017, no. 12.
(In Russian)
Hertog J.A. den. General Theories of Regulation. In Bouckaert B., De Geest G. (eds.).
Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 1999.
Ilyushina M.N. Novels of the Civil Code of Russia on Liability in Obligations of Persons
Engaged in Entrepreneurial Activities. Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice,
2016, no. 7. (In Russian)
Karapetov A.G. (ed.). Bargains, Agency, Limitation of Actions: Article-by-Article
Comment to Articles 153–208 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic
Issue. Edition 1.0]. Moscow: M-Logos, 2018. (In Russian)
Karapetov A.G. (ed.). Contractual and Obligation Law (General Part): Article-by-
Article Comment to Articles 307–453 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation [Electronic
Issue. Edition 1.0]. Moscow: M-Logos, 2017. (In Russian)
Karapetov A.G. Economic Analysis of Law. Moscow: Statut, 2016.
Karpova A.A. Procedural Problems of the Realization of the Rights of the Parties to
a Contested Executed Bargain to Conclude an Agreement about Other Consequences
of Its Invalidity. Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2018, no. 4. (In Russian)
Komissarova E.G. Formal-Logical Aspects of the Concept of “Legal Nature”. Bulletin
of Perm University. Jurisprudence, 2012, no. 2(16). (In Russian)
Kovač M. Comparative Contract Law and Economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Publishing, 2011.
Kurochkin S.A. Agreement in Civil Procedure. Herald of Civil Procedure, 2012, no. 3.
(In Russian)
Kurochkin S.A. On the Prospects for the Development of Private and Public Principles
in Civil Procedure. Herald of Civil Procedure, 2014, no. 1. (In Russian)
Maltsev G.V. Social Foundations of Law. Moscow: NORMA; INFRA-M, 2011. (In
Russian)
Matveev I.V. Legal Nature of Invalid Transactions: Thesis for a Candidate Degree in
Law Sciences. Moscow, 2002. (In Russian)
Mikhaylov S.V. Category of Interest in Civil (Private) Law: Thesis for a Candidate
Degree in Law Sciences. Moscow, 2000. (In Russian)
Nikulinskaya N.F. Commentary to Chapter 15 “Trial” of the Civil Procedure Code
of the Russian Federation of 14 November 2002 No. 138-FZ (Itemized). SPS “ConsultantPlus”.
(In Russian)
Osokina G.L. Civil Procedure. Special Part. Moscow: NORMA, 2007. (In Russian)
Ostanina E.A. The Consequences of the Invalidity of Bargains, Determined by the Contract.
Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2015, no. 17(372), Law, iss. 43. (In Russian)
Povarov Yu.S. Features of the Invalidity of the Business Contract. Lawyer, 2016, no. 8.
(In Russian)
Pozner R.; Tambovtsev V.L. (ed.). Economic Analysis of Law. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. St.
Petersburg: Ekonomicheskaya shkola, 2004. (In Russian)
Rozhkova M.A. Application in the Commercial Circulation of the Amicable Agreement.
Moscow: Statut, 2005. (In Russian)
Ruchkin G.F. (ed.). Business Law: Textbook. Moscow: All-Russian State Tax Academy
of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation, Vysshee obrazovanie, Yurayt-
Izdat, 2009. (In Russian)
Ruzanova V.D. Obligations Related to the Implementation by the Parties of Entrepreneurial
Activity: Problems of Differentiation of Legal Regulation. Civil Law, 2018,
no. 4. (In Russian)
Shemeneva O.N. The Role of the Agreements of the Parties in Civil Proceedings.
Moscow: Infotropic Media, 2017. (In Russian)
Sinitsyn S.A. General Doctrine of Absolute and Relative Subjective Rights: Thesis
for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences. Moscow, 2017. (In Russian)
Sinitsyn S.A. Restitutional Legal Relations: Concept, Content, Classification Problems.
Lawyer, 2015, no. 19. (In Russian)
Sklovsky K.I. The Bargain and Its Invalidity. Comment of Chapter 9 of the Civil Code
of the Russian Federation (Concept, Types and Form of Transactions. Invalidity of Bargains).
3rd ed. Moscow: Statut, 2015. (In Russian)
Solomin S.K. Novels of Law of Obligations: Posing Some Problematic Issues. Law,
2015, no. 9. (In Russian)
Sorvina G.N. Economic Thought of the 20th Century: Pages of History. Lectures.
Moscow: ROSSPEN, 2000. (In Russian)
Strukov A.A. The Conclusion of the Settlement Agreement at the Stage of Enforcement
of the Judicial Act. In Valeev D.Kh., Chelyshev M.Yu. (eds.). Enforcement Proceedings:
Collection of Materials of the All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference. Moscow:
Statut, 2009. (In Russian)
Timofeev E.A. “Law and Economics”: Doctrine of Law and State in the USA in
20th Century: Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences. Nizhny Novgorod, 2016.
(In Russian)
Titov N.D. Consequences of Invalidity of Bargains. In Lebedev V.M., Osokina G.L.,
Solomin S.K., Pashkova G.G. (eds.). Legal Problems of Strengthening Russian Statehood:
Collection of Articles. Part 68. Tomsk: Publishing House of Tomsk University,
2016. (In Russian)
Tuzov D.O.; Khaskelberg B.L., Chernov V.M. (eds.). Claims Related to the Invalidity
of Bargains. Theoretical Essay. Tomsk: Peleng, 1998. (In Russian)
Vitryansky V.V. Civil Law Reform: Interim Results. 2nd ed. Moscow: Statut, 2018.
(In Russian)
Yarkov V.V. The Ratio of Binding and Enforceability of Judicial Acts. Russian Legal
Journal, 2018, no. 5. (In Russian)
Zaboev K.I. On the Application of Article 168 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation
and on the Issue of Public Interests. Law, 2015, no. 9. (In Russian)
Zavidovskaya E.S. The Procedural Limits of Freedom to Enter into a Settlement
Agreement in Arbitration Procedure. Bulletin of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow
District, 2017, no. 1. (In Russian)
Information about the author
Goncharova V.A. (Tomsk, Russia) – Postgraduate Student of the Department of
Civil Law of the Law Institute of Tomsk National Research State University (8 Moskovsky
trakt, Tomsk, 634050, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Goncharova V.A. Contractual Freedom in Applying of the Consequences of Its Invalidity:
Search for an Acceptable Procedural Form. Herald of Civil Procedure, 2019, vol. 9,
no. 5, p. 205–229. (In Russian) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2019-9-5-205-229
В.А. ГОНЧАРОВА
Реклама
Наши партнеры
