Наши индексы цитирования:
УПРОЩЕНИЕ СУДОПРОИЗВОДСТВА, ИЛИ ПО КОМ ЗВОНИТ КОЛОКОЛ?
УПРОЩЕНИЕ СУДОПРОИЗВОДСТВА,
ИЛИ ПО КОМ ЗВОНИТ КОЛОКОЛ?
А.Р. СУЛТАНОВ,
начальник юридического управления
ПАО «Нижнекамскнефтехим»
DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2018-8-5-67-90
В статье даны анализ и критика законопроекта об уменьшении времени судей
по изготовлению судебных актов за счет освобождения их от обязанности гото-
вить мотивировочные части судебных актов, оставив обязанность мотивиро-
вать судебные акты только по некоторым категориям дел и по требованию лиц,
участвующих в деле. Автор предполагает, что после реализации данной инициа-
тивы Верховного Суда РФ случаи принятия новых доказательств в суде апелляци-
онной инстанции еще уменьшатся, хотя возможность приобщения новых доказа-
тельств в суде апелляционной инстанции уже ограничена законом, а отсутствие
мотивов апелляционной инстанции превратит кассационную проверку в повтор-
ное исследование решения первой инстанции, ограниченное возможностью прово-
дить переоценку доказательств. Практиками высказываются предположения
о том, что фактически апелляция может превратиться в «проходную» инстан-
цию, которая гарантированно не будет вникать в рассмотрение дела. По мнению
автора, это может также обесценить инициативу Пленума Верховного Суда РФ
о создании в Российской Федерации структурно самостоятельных кассационных
судов общей юрисдикции и апелляционных судов общей юрисдикции. Для способ-
ствования укреплению законности, правопорядка и предупреждения правонару-
шений необходимо создание ситуации, когда все лица, участвующие в деле, поняли
и приняли постановленное решение. Обязательным условием для этого является
анализ в мотивировочной части решения всех доводов и обстоятельств, приве-
денных сторонами в процессе судебного разбирательства.
Ключевые слова: судопроизводство; мотивировочная часть; судебное решение;
апелляция; гражданский процесс; арбитражный процесс.
References
Abova T.E. O nekotorykh neopravdannykh rashozhdeniyakh mezhdu dejstvuyushchimi
APK RF i GPK RF v regulirovanii protsessual’nykh otnoshenij [On Some Unjustified
Discrepancies Between the Existing Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian
Federation and Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in the Regulation of
Procedural Relations]. Rossijskij ezhegodnik grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessa =
Russian Yearbook of Civil and Arbitration Procedure, 2005, no. 4. St. Petersburg, 2006.
(In Russian)
Afanasiev S.F. K probleme realizatsii prava byt’ vyslushannym v sude pri rassmotrenii
grazhdanskikh del [To the Problem of Exercising the Right to Be Heard in Court in Civil
Cases]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2012, no. 4. (In
Russian)
Afanasiev S.F. Pravo na poluchenie motivirovannogo sudebnogo resheniya po grazhdanskomu
delu (mezhdunarodnyj i natsional’nyj aspekty) [The Right to a Motivated Court
Decision in a Civil Case (International and National Aspects)]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij
protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2008, no. 12. (In Russian)
Belyaeva N.G. Motivirovannost’ sudebnykh aktov v svete standartov Evropejskogo
suda po pravam cheloveka [The Motivation of Judicial Acts in the Light of Standards of
the European Court of Human Rights]. Sud’ya = Judge, 2017, no. 2. (In Russian)
Bevzenko R.S. Est’ li smysl v osvobozhdenii sudej ot obyazannosti gotovit’ sudebnye
akty s motivirovkoj? [Does It Make Sense to Relieve Judges from the Obligation
to Prepare Judicial Acts with Motivation?] (https://zakon.ru/blog/2017/09/27/est_li_
smysl_v_osvobozhdenii_sudej_ot_obyazannosti_gotovit_sudebnye_akty_s_motivirovkoj).
(In Russian)
Dobson E. Pochemu my govorim o slushanii? [Why Are We Talking About Court
Hearing?]. Logos = Logos, 2015, no. 6. (In Russian)
Dolova M.O. Razvitie nauki grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava Rossii: Dis. …
kand. yurid. nauk [Development of the Science of Civil Procedural Law of Russia: Thesis
for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 2017. (In Russian)
Downing J. Grassroots Media: Establishing Priorities for the Years Ahead. Global
Media Journal (Australia Edition), 2007, vol. 1(1).
Goykhbarg A.G. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa [Course of Civil Procedure]. Moscow,
1928. (In Russian)
Gredeskul N.A. K ucheniyu ob osushchestvlenii prava. Intellektual’nyj protsess, trebuyushchijsya
dlya osushchestvleniya prava [To the Doctrine of the Exercise of Law. The
Intellectual Process Required to Exercise Law]. Kharkiv, 1900. (In Russian)
Gyulumyan V.G. Printsipy tolkovaniya Evropejskoj konventsii prav cheloveka (kritika
i zashchita) [Principles of Interpretation of the European Convention on Human
Rights (Criticism and Protection)]. Zhurnal konstitutsionnogo pravosudiya = Journal
of Constitutional Justice, 2015, no. 3. (In Russian)
Karapetov A. Samyj prostoj sposob sushchestvenno snizit’ izbytochnuyu nagruzku na
sudej (v kontekste zapushchennoj sudebnoj reformy) [The Easiest Way to Significantly
Reduce the Excessive Burden on Judges (in the Context of the Launched Judicial Reform)]
(https://zakon.ru/blog/2017/10/20/samyj_prostoj_sposob_suschestvenno_snizit_izbytochnuyu_
nagruzku_na_sudej_v_kontekste_zapuschennoj_su). (In Russian)
Karklin O. Kak uprostit’ kassatsionnoe proizvodstvo [How to Simplify the Cassation
Proceedings]. Ezhenedel’nik sovetskoj yustitsii = Weekly Soviet Justice, 1923, no. 29.
(In Russian)
Kleandrov M.I. Sudejskoe soobshchestvo: struktura, organizatsionno-pravovoe razvitie
[Judicial Community: Structure, Organizational and Legal Development]. Moscow,
2014. (In Russian)
Knyazkin S.I. Motivirovannost’ sudebnykh reshenij kak faktor ikh effektivnoj proverki
v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [The Motivation of Court Decisions as a Factor in Their
Effective Verification in Civil Procedure]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitration
and Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 4. (In Russian)
Krasnov M. U sudebnoj vlasti est’ tol’ko odin zashchitnik – obshchestvo [The Judiciary
Has Only One Defender – the Society]. Rossijskaya yustitsiya = Russian Justice,
2003, no. 6. (In Russian)
Malchenko K.N. Preyuditsiya sudebnykh postanovlenij v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve:
Dis. … kand. yurid. nauk [The Prejudice of Judicial Decisions in Civil Proceedings:
Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Saratov, 2015. (In Russian)
Malinin M.I. Teoriya grazhdanskogo protsessa [Theory of Civil Procedure]. Odessa,
1881. (In Russian)
Morshchakova T.G. (ed.). Standarty spravedlivogo pravosudiya. Mezhdunarodnye
i natsional’nye praktiki [Standards of Fair Justice. International and National Practices].
Moscow, 2012. (In Russian)
Musina V.A. Problemy nadzornogo proizvodstva v grazhdanskom protsesse Rossijskoj
Federatsii (doklad na Mezhdunarodnoj konferentsii «Vliyanie Evropejskoj konventsii
o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod na razvitie pravovykh sistem evropejskikh
stran», Yaroslavl’, 28–30 iyunya 2006 g.) [The Problems of Supervisory Proceedings in
Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation (Report at the International Conference “The
Impact of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms on the Development of Legal Systems of European Countries”, Yaroslavl,
28–30 June 2006)]. (In Russian)
Nekhamkin N. Uprostit’ ili uprazdnit’ [Simplify or Abolish]. Ezhenedel’nik sovetskoj
yustitsii = Weekly Soviet Justice, 1923, no. 34. (In Russian)
Poldnikov D.Yu. Nauchnaya doktrina i argumentatsiya sudebnykh reshenij v kontinental’noj
pravovoj traditsii: epokha formirovaniya [Scientific Doctrine and Argumentation
of Judicial Decisions in the Continental Legal Tradition: The Era of Formation].
Yuridicheskaya tekhnika = Legal Technology, 2013, no. 7-1. (In Russian)
Polyakov Yu.N. K voprosu o nezavisimosti suda [On the Independence of the Court].
Gosudarstvo i parvo = State and Law, 2000, no. 10. (In Russian)
Rabtsevich O.I. Pravo na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel’stvo: mezhdunarodnoe
i vnutrigosudarstvennoe pravovoe regulirovanie [The Right to a Fair Trial: International
and Domestic Legal Regulation]. Moscow, 2005. (In Russian)
Ratushnaya B.P. Problemy motivirovannosti sudebnykh reshenij v Ukraine [Problems
of Motivation of Court Decisions in Ukraine]. Pravo i politika = Law and Politics,
2013, no. 6. (In Russian)
Rozenman G. Eshche po voprosu o kompetentsii narodnykh sudej [More on the Competence
of People’s Judges]. Ezhenedel’nik sovetskoj yustitsii = Weekly Soviet Justice, 1924,
nos. 39–40. (In Russian)
Sambur I. Eshche o motivirovannykh resheniyakh [More on Motivated Decisions].
Ezhenedel’nik sovetskoj yustitsii = Weekly Soviet Justice, 1923, no. 34. (In Russian)
Semitko A.P. «Nezapadnye» kontseptsii prav cheloveka: voprosy metodologii [“Non-
Western” Concepts of Human Rights: Questions of Methodology]. Rossijskij ezhegodnik
teorii prava = Russian Yearbook of Theory of Law, 2009, no. 2. (In Russian)
Shadarova A.N. Razvitie kontseptsii motivirovannosti sudebnykh reshenij v praktike
Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [Development of the Concept of Motivated
Court Decisions in the Practice of the European Court of Human Rights]. Pretsedenty
Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka = Precedents of the European Court of Human
Rights, 2016, no. 5. (In Russian)
Sherstyuk V.M. Sovremennye problemy grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo sudoproizvodstva:
Sbornik statej [Modern Problems of Civil and Arbitration Proceedings: Collection
of Articles]. Moscow, 2015. (In Russian)
Smirnov A.V. Publichnost’ (otkrytost’) sudebnoj vlasti kak uslovie demokratii v Rossii
[Publicity (Openness) of the Judiciary as a Condition of Democracy in Russia] (http://
kalinovsky-k.narod.ru/b/st/smirnov2004.htm). (In Russian)
Sukhorukova O.A. Effektivnost’ grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva: kommunikativnyj
protsess [The Effectiveness of Civil Proceedings: The Communicative Process]. Voronezh,
2017. (In Russian)
Sultanov A.R. Bezuslovnoe bezobrazie, ili yavlyaetsya li polnoe kopirovanie teksta vozrazhenij
dopustimym v kachestve sudebnogo resheniya? [An Unconditional Disgrace, or
Is Full Copying of the Text of the Objections Acceptable as a Court Decision?]. Vestnik
grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 5. (In Russian)
Sultanov A.R. Evropejskie pravovye standarty: uroki istorii i pravoprimenitel’naya
praktika [European Legal Standards: History Lessons and Law Enforcement Practice].
Moscow, 2012. (In Russian)
Sultanov A.R. Kopipast kak otkaz v pravosudii [Copypast as a Denial of Justice].
Evrazijskaya advokatura = Eurasian Advocate Service, 2017, no. 5. (In Russian)
Sultanov A.R. Motivirovannost’ sudebnogo akta kak odna iz osnovnykh problem spravedlivogo
pravosudiya [The Motivation of the Judicial Act as One of the Main Problems
of Fair Justice]. Zakon = Law, 2014, no. 8. (In Russian)
Sultanov A.R. O probleme motivirovannosti sudebnykh aktov cherez prizmu postanovlenij
Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [On the Problem of Motivation of Judicial
Acts Through the Prism of Judgments of the European Court of Human Rights].
Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe parvo = International Public and Private Law,
2008, no. 2. (In Russian)
Sultanov A.R. Pravovaya opredelennost’ v nadzornom proizvodstve GPK RF i praktika
Konstitutsionnogo Suda RF [Legal Certainty in the Supervisory Review of the Civil Procedure
Code of the Russian Federation and the Practice of the Constitutional Court of
the Russian Federation]. Pravo i politika = Law and Politics, 2007, no. 5. (In Russian)
Sultanov A.R. Pravovye posledstviya nemotivirovannosti nenormativnykh pravovykh
aktov pri ikh osparivanii v sudakh [Legal Consequences of Non-Motivated Non-Regulatory
Legal Acts When Challenging Them in Courts]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa
= Herald of Civil Procedure, 2014, no. 4. (In Russian)
Sultanov A.R. Vliyanie pravovykh pozitsij Evropejskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka
na transparentnost’ rossijskogo pravosudiya [The Impact of the Legal Positions of the
European Court of Human Rights on the Transparency of Russian Justice]. In Rossijskaya
yuridicheskaya nauka: sostoyanie, problemy, perspektivy: Materialy Vserossijskoj
nauchno-prakticheskoj konferentsii, posvyashchennoj 45-letiyu yuridicheskogo obrazovaniya
na Altae [Russian Legal Science: Condition, Problems, Prospects: Materials of
the All-Russian Scientific-Practical Conference Dedicated to the 45th Anniversary of
Legal Education in Altai]. Barnaul, 2008. (In Russian)
Sultanov A.R. Yavlyaetsya li nemotivirovannoe pravosudie pravosudiem? [If Unmotivated
Justice Is Justice?]. Rossijskij sud’ya = Russian Judge, 2017, no. 12. (In Russian)
Treushnikov M.K. (ed.). Put’ k zakonu [Way to Law]. Moscow, 2004. (In Russian)
Trunk A. Obespechenie edinstva sudebnoj praktiki Verhovnym Sudom: opyt Germanii
[Ensuring the Unity of Judicial Practice by the Supreme Court: The Experience of Germany].
In Yuridicheskaya priroda normativnykh postanovlenij Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki
Kazakhstan i ikh rol’ v effektivnosti otpravleniya pravosudiya [The Legal Nature
of the Regulations of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan and Their Role
in the Effectiveness of the Administration of Justice]. Astana, 2009. (In Russian)
Tsuvina T.A. Motivirovannost’ reshenij suda i pravo na sud v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve
[The Motivation of Court Decisions and the Right to a Court in Civil Proceedings].
Problemy zakonnosti = Problems of Legitimacy, 2013, Issue 121. (In Russian)
Tuzov N.A. Motivirovanie i preyuditsiya sudebnykh aktov [Motivation and Prejudice
of Judicial Acts]. Moscow, 2006. (In Russian)
Uvarov P.Yu. Frantsiya XVI veka: opyt rekonstruktsii po notarial’nym aktam [France
of the XVI Century: The Experience of Reconstruction of Notarial Acts]. Moscow,
1990. (In Russian)
Van Hoecke M. Pravo kak kommunikaciya [Law as Communication]. St. Petersburg,
2012. (In Russian)
Vasyaev A.A. Mozhet li schitat’sya sud nezavisimym, esli tekst prigovora povtoryaet
tekst obvinitel’nogo zakljucheniya (akta)? [May a Court Be Considered Independent
If the Text of the Sentence Repeats the Text of the Indictment (Act)?]. In Ugolovno-
protsessual‘nye i kriminalisticheskie chteniya: Materialy Mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt.
internet-konferentsii. Irkutsk, 16–30 aprelya 2012 g. [Criminal Procedural and Forensic
Readings: Materials of the International Scientific and Practical Internet Conference.
Irkutsk, 16–30 April 2012]. Irkutsk, 2012. (In Russian)
Vasyaev A.A., Knyazkin S.A. Motivirovannost’ sudebnykh reshenij – standart Evropejskogo
suda po pravam cheloveka [The Motivation of Court Decisions – the Standard of
the European Court of Human Rights]. Advokat = Lawyer, 2013, no. 6. (In Russian)
Vereshchagin A.N. Osobye mneniya v rossijskikh sudakh [Individual Opinions in
Russian Courts]. Gosudarstvo i parvo = State and Law, 2008, no. 2. (In Russian).
Zagaynova S.K. Sudebnye akty v mekhanizme realizatsii sudebnoj vlasti v grazhdanskom
i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Judicial Acts in the Mechanism of Implementation of
the Judiciary in Civil and Arbitration Procedure]. Moscow, 2007. (In Russian)
Zagryatskov M.D. Administrativnaya yustitsiya i pravo zhalob [Administrative Justice
and Complaints Law]. Moscow, 1924. (In Russian)
Zagryatskov M.D. Pravo zhaloby [The Right to Appeal]. Voprosy pravovedeniya =
Issues of Jurisprudence, 2012, no. 1. (In Russian)
Zaytsev I.M. Reshenie suda kak protsessual’nyj document [Court Decision as a Procedural
Document]. Vestnik SGAP = Herald of Saratov State Academy of Law, 1995, no. 2.
(In Russian)
Zhuykov V.M. Sudebnaya reforma: problemy dostupa k pravosudiyu [Judicial Reform:
Problems of Access to Justice]. Moscow, 2006. (In Russian)
Zupanchich B. Ob universal’noj prirode prav cheloveka [On the Universal Nature of
Human Rights]. Prava cheloveka. Praktika Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka = Human
Rights. Practice of the European Court of Human Rights, 2007, no. 6. (In Russian)
Information about the author
Sultanov A.R. (Nizhnekamsk, Russia) – Head of the Legal Department of the PJSC
“Nizhnekamskneftekhim” (423574, Nizhnekamsk, PJSC “Nizhnekamskneftekhim”;
e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Sultanov A.R. Uproshchenie sudoproizvodstva, ili po kom zvonit kolokol? [Summary
Judgment or for Whom the Bell Tolls?]. Вестник гражданского процесса = Herald
of Civil Procedure, 2018, no. 5, p. 67–90. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2018-
8-5-67-90
А.Р. СУЛТАНОВ
Реклама
Наши партнеры
