Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

The European Approach to Harmonization of Civil Procedural Law in a Historical Perspective

HISTORY OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE


V.V. Terekhov

V.V. Terekhov, 
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Master of European Union Law (LL.M.), 
Lecturer of the Department of Private Law of the Vilnius University 

This article describes an author’s view on the problem of the genesis and evolution of the EU activity in the field of its Member States’ Civil Procedural Law approximation. It is noted that from the conclusion of the Rome Treaty in 1957 to the present days the EU has passed a number of developmental stages, where each was marked by different goals, range of objects to be regulated and forms of influence upon the municipal law. Herewith the changes were evolutionary, rather than revolutionary and each consequent step did not set aside the previous ones, but relied upon their achievements and core ideas. At the same time, the meaning of such concepts as «mutual recognition», «common area of justice» had been sufficiently revised with time. The evolution was going in the direction of inevitable enlargement of EU competence in the matters of private justice. The author points out that the European Union was advancing, step by step, from a simple interstate cooperation in civil cases to a uniform procedural order that would unite all the national systems of judgment into a single whole. All of this became possible both due to the influence of external factors and in virtue of the natural desire of the European nations to develop in the direction of convergence and not separation and local insularity. 

Keywords: harmonization and unification of civil procedure; European Civil Procedure; mutual recognition; mutual trust; Area of Freedom, Security and Justice; cross-border litigation.

References 

Ansel’ Zh.-P., Abassi M. Ispolnenie inostrannyh sudebnyh reshenij [Execution of Foreign Judgements]. Zhurnal rossijskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2006, no. 8. (In Russian) 
Arenas R. Abolition of Exequatur: Problems and Solutions. Mutual Recognition, Mutual Trust and Recognition of Foreign Documents: Too Many Words in the Sea. Yearbook of Private International Law, 2010, vol. 12. 
Baca W.M.K. The Principle of Mutual Recognition of Judicial Decisions in EU Law in the Light of the «Full Faith and Credit» Clause of the US Constitution (http://www. comunidadandina.org/BDA/docs/CAN-INT-0061.pdf). 
Bayraktaroglu G. Harmonization of Private International Law at Different Levels: Communitarization v. International Harmonization. European Journal of Law Reform, 2003, vol. 5. 
Beaumont P., Johnston E. Can Exequatur Be Abolished in Brussels I Whilst Retaining a Public Policy Defence. Journal of Private International Law, 2010, vol. 6(2). 
Biryukov M.M. Evropejskoe pravo: do i posle Lissabonskogo dogovora [European Law: Before and After the Lisbon Agreement]. Moscow, 2016. (In Russian) 
Boele-Woelki K. Unification and Harmonization of Private International Law in Europe. In Basedow J. (ed.). Private Law in the International Arena: Liber Amicorum Kurt Siehr. The Hague, 2000. 
Bolt J. Review Essay – Procedural Laws in Europe. Towards Harmonisation (Marcel Storme ed. 2003). German Law Journal, 2005, vol. 6(4). 
Brabandere E. The Impact of «Supranationalism» on State Sovereignty from the Perspective of the Legitimacy of International Organisations. In French D. (ed.). Statehood and Self-Determination: Reconciling Tradition and Modernity in International Law. Cambridge, 2013. 
Brand R. European Union’s New Role in International Private Litigation. Loyola University Chicago International Law Review, 2005, vol. 2. 
Semushkina N.I. Rol’ printsipa vzaimnogo doveriya v razvitii obshchego prostranstva pravosudiya v Evropejskom Soyuze [The Role of the Principle of Mutual Trust in Development of Common Justice Space in the European Union]. Voprosy ekonomiki i prava = Issues of Economics and Law, 2016, no. 3 (In Russian) 
Silvestri E. Po napravleniyu k evropejskomu grazhdanskomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu? Poslednie initsiativy po razrabotke evropejskih pravil grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Towards a European Code of Civil Procedure? Recent Initiatives for the Drafting of European Rules of Civil Procedure]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2016, no. 1. (In Russian) 
Silvestri E. Towards a European Code of Civil Procedure? Recent Initiatives for the Drafting of European Rules of Civil Procedure (https://www.academia.edu/18086809/ Towards_a_European_Code_of_Civil_Procedure). 
Šinová R., Valentová L. Handbook of European Civil Procedure Law. Olomouc, 2012. 
Stadler A. From the Brussels Convention to Regulation 44/2001: Cornerstones of a European Law of Civil Procedure. Common Market Law Review, 2005, vol. 42. 
Storme M. General Introductory Report (MS/EURPROC) (https://www.law.kuleuven. be/web/mstorme/Eu.Harmonis.Proced.intro.pdf).
Storme M. Improving Access to Justice in Europe. Teka Komisji Prawniczej, 2010, vol. 3. 
Storme M. Rapprochement du droit judiciaire de l’Union europeenne [Approximation of Judiciary Law in the European Union]. Dordrecht, 1994. 
Storskrubb E. Civil Justice – a Newcomer and an Unstoppable Wave. In de Búrca G., Craig P (eds.). The Evolution of EU Law. Oxford, 2011. 
Storskrubb E. Civil Procedure and EU Law: A Policy Area Uncovered. Oxford, 2008. 
Tangney P. The New Internationalism: The Cession of Sovereign Competences to Supranational Organizations and Constitutional Change in the United States and Germany. Yale Journal of International Law, 1996, vol. 21. 
Tulibacka M. Europeanization of Civil Procedures: In Search of a Coherent Approach. Common Market Law Review, 2009, vol. 46.
Vernadaki Z. EU Civil Procedure and Access to Justice after the Lisbon Treaty: Perspectives for a Coherent Approach (PhD Thesis). London, 2013. 
Zhoffrua K. Novyj Reglament ES o podsudnosti, priznanii i ispolnenii sudebnyh reshenij po grazhdanskim i kommercheskim delam – shag k okonchatel’noj otmene ekzekvatury v Evrope [New Order of the European Union on Arbitrability, Recognition and Execution of Civil and Commercial Cases Judgements]. Zakon = Law, 2013, no. 11. (In Russian) 
Zilinsky R. Abolishing Exequatur in the European Union: The European Enforcement Order. Netherlands International Law Review, 2006, vol. 53. 

Information about the author 

Terekhov V.V. (Vilnius, Lithuania) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Master of European Union Law (LL.M.), Lecturer of the Department of Private Law of the Vilnius University (Lithuania, LT-10222, Vilnius, Saulėtekio al. 9-I/311; e-mail: ptkatedra@ tf.vu.lt). 

Recommended citation 

Terekhov V.V. Evropejskij podhod k sblizheniyu grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava v istoricheskoj perspektive [The European Approach to Harmonization of Civil Procedural Law in a Historical Perspective]. Вестник гражданского процесса = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 3, p. 145–187. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2017- 7-3-154-187

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

Keywords