Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

On Functional Relations of the Institution of Procedural Responsibility

PROBLEMS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE


D.A. Lipinsky

D.A. LIPINSKY,
Doctor of Legal Sciences,
Professor of the Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law
of the Togliatti State University

The article is devoted to coordination, genetic and subordination relations of the institution
of procedural responsibility. The author gives a general concept of the institution of
procedural responsibility, and also defines the term “functional connection” and gives
ratio of institutions of legal responsibility and procedural responsibility. The author
analyses genetic, coordination and subordination relations of the institution of procedural
responsibility that has a complex structure as it comprises a number of sub institutions.
The article substantiates the existence of those relations inside the institution of procedural
responsibility as well as with other institutions of legal responsibility. In order to do so,
the external and internal relations are differentiated. The genetic relations are determined
based on formation and separation of the branches of law as well as the differentiation
of material and procedural law in the process of historical development. The nearest and
remote genetic relations are determined. The existence of subordination relations both with
the institutions of constitutional responsibility and constitutional law as a whole has been
noted. The article studies spatial ordering that is characteristic of coordination relations.
It is expressed through the use of common notions, terms, definitions, the dependence
of realization of different procedural types of responsibility on its material types, and
therefore conditionality (a derivative nature) of procedural responsibility by material
responsibility. The article was written with the support of the Russian Humanitarian
Scientific Foundation, project No. 16-33-00017 “Complex, Intersectoral Institution of Legal
Responsibility: Notion, Structure, Interconnections and Place in the System of Law”.

Keywords: procedural responsibility; coordination relations; genetic relations; functional
relations; subordination relations; sub institutions of procedural responsibility.

References

Agapov A.B. Administrativnaya otvetstvennost’ [Administrative Responsibility].
Moscow, 2000. (In Russian)
Alekseev S.S. Obshchie dozvoleniya i obshchie zaprety v sovetskom prave [General
Permissions and General Prohibitions in Soviet Law]. Moscow, 1989. (In Russian)
Alekseev S.S. Struktura sovetskogo prava [Structure of Soviet Law]. Moscow, 1975.
(In Russian)
Bazylev B.T. Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’ [Legal Responsibility]. Krasnoyarsk,
1985. (In Russian)
Blauberg I.V., Yudin E.G. Stanovlenie i sushchnost’ sistemnogo podkhoda [Formation
and Essence of the System Approach]. Moscow, 1973. (In Russian)
Cherdantsev A.F. Sistemoobrazuyushchie svyazi prava [System-Forming Relations of
Law]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo = Soviet State and Law, 1974, no. 8. (In Russian)
Chirkov A.P. Otvetstvennost’ v sisteme prava [Responsibility in the System of Law].
Kaliningrad, 1996. (In Russian)
Daev V.G. Vzaimosvyaz’ ugolovnogo prava i protsessa [Interconnection of Criminal
Law and Procedure]. Leningrad, 1982. (In Russian)
Gessen V.M. Iz lektsii po politseiskomu pravu [From Lectures on the Police Law]. St.
Petersburg, 1902. (In Russian)
Goncharov D.Yu. Geneticheskie svyazi norm ugolovnogo i ugolovno-protsessual’nogo
zakonodatel’stva [Genetic Relations of Norms of the Criminal and Criminal-Procedural
Legislation]. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2007, no. 10. (In Russian)
Kabanov P.A. Karatel’naya funktsiya v sisteme funktsij yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti
[Punitive Function in the System of Functions of Legal Responsibility]. Togliatti, 2004.
(In Russian)
Lavrentyev A.R. Kollizii instituta yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti [Collisions of the
Institution of Legal Responsibility]: Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences. N.
Novgorod, 1999. (In Russian)
Leist O.E. Sanktsii i otvetstvennost’ po sovetskomu pravu [Sanctions and Responsibility
under Soviet Law]. Moscow, 1971. (In Russian)
Lipinsky D.A. Aktual’nye problemy konstitutsionnoj otvetstvennosti [Topical Issues of Constitutional
Responsibility]. Formula prava = Formula of Law, 2005, no. 1. (In Russian)
Lipinsky D.A. Problemy yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti [Issues of Legal Responsibility].
St. Petersburg, 2004. (In Russian)
Lipinsky D.A., Chuklova E.V. Protsessual’naya otvetstvennost’ kak institut prava [Procedural
Responsibility as an Institution of Law]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald
of Civil Procedure, 2016, no. 4. (In Russian)
Nokhrin D.G. Otvetstvennost’ suda za nepravomernoe bezdejstvie [Responsibility
of the Court for Illegitimate Inaction]. Rossijskaya yustitsiya = Russian Justice, 2007,
no. 1. (In Russian)
Pavlushina A.A. Teoriya yuridicheskogo protsessa: problemy i perspektivy [Theory of
Legal Procedure: Problems and Prospects]: Thesis for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences.
N. Novgorod, 2005. (In Russian)
Senyakin I.N. Spetsializatsiya i unifikatsiya rossijskogo zakonodatel’stva [Specialization
and Unification of the Russian Legislation]: Thesis for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences.
Saratov, 1993. (In Russian)
Sluchevsky V. Uchebnik russkogo ugolovnogo protsessa [Textbook of Russian Criminal
Procedure]. St. Petersburg, 1913. (In Russian)
Syromyatnikov B.I. Ocherk istorii suda v drevnej i novoj Rossii. Sudebnaya reforma.
T. 1 [Essays on History of the Court in Ancient and Modern Russia. Court Reform.
Vol. 1]. Moscow, 1915. (In Russian)
Trofimova M.P. Funktsii yuridicheskoj otvetstvennosti [Functions of Legal Responsibility]:
Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences. Samara, 2000. (In Russian)

Information about the author

Lipinsky D.A. (Togliatti, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the
Department of Constitutional and Administrative Law of the Togliatti State University
(445000, Togliatti, Belorusskaya St., 14; e-mail: Dmitri8@yandex.ru).

Recommended citation

Lipinsky D.A. O funktsional’nykh svyazyakh instituta protsessual’noj otvetstvennosti
[On Functional Relations of the Institution of Procedural Responsibility]. Вестник
гражданского процесса = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2018, no. 3, p. 55–70. (In Russian)
DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2018-8-3-55-70

 1a.jpg  баннер2.jpg  баннер3.jpg

Keywords