Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

CONTRACTUAL ELEMENTS IN CIVIL PROCEDURE

PROBLEMS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE


М.А. FOKINA

М.А. FOKINA,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor,
Department of Civil and Administrative Proceedings,
Russian State University of Justice

DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-2-118-130

The article is devoted to the identification and study of contractual elements in civil and
arbitration procedure. This issue is considered in the context of the ratio of dispositive
and imperative principles in the method of regulation of civil procedural and arbitration
procedural law. Attention is drawn to the fact that the parties in the framework of legal
proceedings cannot be as free as in the field of material legal relations. The contradiction
that has arisen between freedom in the sphere of material relations and certain restrictions
in the procedural sphere can be removed using a number of procedural means, which
include procedural agreements. Their purpose is to ensure coordination of the interests of
the disputing parties in the choice of methods and forms of protection, the rights belonging to
them, in the conditions of a dispositive and adversarial proceedings. Procedural agreements
are considered in the system of interactions between parties and other persons involved
in the case. The author believes that procedural cooperation in modern legal proceedings
cannot be limited only to the interaction between the court and the persons participating
in the case. Modern court proceedings, based on the principle of dispositivity, allow in some
cases procedural interactions between persons involved in a case. The central place in the
work is the issue of the impact of procedural agreements on the system of civil procedural
and arbitration procedural relations. According to the author, the object of administrative
activity of the court has a more complex structure than the structure mediated exclusively
by vertical legal relations.

Keywords: dispositive principle; public law; private right; interaction of the parties;
procedural agreement; judicial control; civil procedural relations; procedural action.

References

Chechina N.A. Sistema grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava i sistematizatsiia
zakonodatel’stva [The System of Civil Procedural Law and the Systematization of Legislation].
In Chechina N.A. Izbrannye Trudy [Selected Works]. St. Petersburg: Publishing
House of St. Petersburg State University, 2004. 656 p. (In Russ.)
Eliseev N.G. Dogovornoe regulirovanie grazhdanskilh i arbitrazhnykh protsessual’nykh
otnoshenii: avtoref. dis. … dokt. iurid. nauk [Contractual Regulation of Civil and Arbitration
Procedural Relations: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences].
Moscow, 2016. 41 p. (In Russ.)
Eliseev N.G. Protsessual’nyi dogovor [Procedural Agreement]. Moscow: Statut, 2015.
369 p. (In Russ.)
Fokina M.A. Rol’ sotrudnichestva v primirenii storon: vzaimosviaz’ sudebnykh
i nesudebnykh protsedur [The Role of Cooperation in the Reconciliation of the Parties:
The Relationship of Judicial and Non-Judicial Procedures]. Treteiskii sud – Arbitration
Court, 2017, no. 1, pp. 133–141. (In Russ.)
Fokina M.A. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiia sistemy grazhdanskikh protsessual’nykh
i arbitrazhnykh protsessual’nykh pravootnoshenii [Current Trends in the Development
of the System of Civil Procedural and Arbitration Procedural Relations]. Sovremennoe
parvo – Modern Law, 2013, no. 2, pp. 87–93. (In Russ.)
Gurvich M.A. Grazhdanskie protsessual’nye pravootnosheniia i protsessual’nye deistviia
[Civil Procedural Relations and Procedural Actions]. In Gurvich M.A. Izbrannye
trudy: v 2 t. T. 2 [Selected Works. In 2 vols. Vol. 2]. Krasnodar: Sovetskaia Kuban, 2006.
544 p. (In Russ.)
Iarkov V.V. Vliianie reformy chastnogo prava na razvitie sistemy i form grazhdanskoi
iurisdiktsii [The Impact of Private Law Reform on the Development of the System and
Forms of Civil Jurisdiction]. In Teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy reformy grazhdanskoi
iurisdiktsii: mezhvuzovskii sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Theoretical and Applied Problems
of Civil Jurisdiction Reform: Interuniversity Collection of Scientific Papers]. Yekaterinburg:
Publishing House of University of Humanities, 1998, рp. 45–72. (In Russ.)
Kozlov A.F. Ob osoboi raznovidnosti grazhdanskikh protsessual’nykh pravootnoshenii
[On a Special Kind of Civil Procedural Relations]. In Realizatsiia protsessual’nykh norm
organami grazhdanskoi iurisdiktsii [Implementation of Procedural Rules by Civil Jurisdictions].
Sverdlovsk: Sverdlovsk Law Institute, 1988, pp. 28–35. (In Russ.)
Kurochkin S.A. Soglasheniia v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Agreements in Civil Procedure].
Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2012, no. 3, pp. 52–72.
(In Russ.)
Lazarev V.V. Primenenie sovetskogo prava [Application of Soviet Law]. Kazan: Publishing
House of Kazan University, 1972. 200 p. (In Russ.)
Lukianova E.G. Teoriia protsessual’nogo prava [Theory of Procedural Law]. Moscow:
Norma, 2003. 240 p. (In Russ.)
Maslennikova N.I. Upravlencheskii kharakter grazhdanskikh protsessual’nykh pravootnoshenii
[The Managerial Nature of Civil Procedural Relations]. In Problemy primeneniia
norm grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava [Problems of Application of Civil Procedural
Law]. Sverdlovsk: Sverdlovsk Law Institute, 1986. (In Russ.)
Petrukhin I.L. (ed.). Sudebnaia vlast’ [Judicial Branch]. Moscow: Prospekt, 2003.
720 p. (In Russ.)
Sakhnova T.V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa [Civil Procedure Course]. 2nd ed. Moscow:
Statut, 2014. 784 p. (In Russ.)
Shemeneva O.N. Rol’ protsessual’nykh soglashenii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve:
avtoref. dis. … dokt. iurid. nauk [The Role of Procedural Agreements in Civil Proceedings:
Synopsis of a Thesis for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences]. Voronezh, 2017. 54 p.
(In Russ.)
Shemeneva O.N. Rol’ soglashenii storon v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [The Role
of Agreements of the Parties in Civil Proceedings]. Moscow: Infotropik Media, 2017.
312 p. (In Russ.)
Streltsova E.G. Predely proiavleniia gosudarstvennoi voli v grazhdanskom protsesse
[The Limits of Manifestation of State Will in Civil Procedure]. In Sovremennaia doktrina
grazhdanskogo, arbitrazhnogo protsessa i ispolnitel’nogo proizvodstva: teoriia i praktika:
sbornik nauchnykh statei [The Modern Doctrine of Civil, Arbitration Procedure and
Enforcement Proceedings: Theory and Practice: Collection of Scientific Articles]. Krasnodar;
St. Petersburg: Iuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2004, рp. 287–296. (In Russ.)
Tsihotskii A.V. Teoreticheskie problemy effektivnosti pravosudiia po grazhdanskim delam
[Theoretical Problems of the Effectiveness of Civil Justice]. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1997.
392 p. (In Russ.)
Vaskovskii E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo protsessa [Textbook of Civil Procedure].
Moscow: Zertsalo, 2003. 464 p. (In Russ.)
Zaitsev I.M. Protsessual’nye funktsii grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Procedural
Functions of Civil Proceedings]. Saratov: Publishing House of Saratov University, 1990.
137 p. (In Russ.)
Zaitsev I.M. Sootnoshenie publichno-pravovogo i chastnopravovogo v grazhdanskom
protsessual’nom kodekse [The Ratio of Public Law and Private Law in the Code of Civil
Procedure]. In Teoreticheskie i prikladnye problemy reformy grazhdanskoi iurisdiktsii:
mezhvuzovskii sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Theoretical and Applied Problems of Civil
Jurisdiction Reform: Interuniversity Collection of Scientific Papers]. Yekaterinburg:
Publishing House of University of Humanities, 1998, рp. 21–33. (In Russ.)
Zeider N.B. Grazhdanskie protsessual’nye pravootnosheniia [Civil Procedural Relations].
Saratov: Publishing House of Saratov University, 1965. 72 p. (In Russ.)
Zubovich M.M. Protsessual’noe vzaimodeistvie sub”ektov arbitrazhnogo dokazyvaniia
[The Procedural Interaction of the Subjects of Arbitration Evidence]. Moscow: Gorodets,
2007. 192 p. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

М.А. Fokina (Moscow, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Department
of Civil and Administrative Proceedings, Russian State University of Justice (69
Novocheremushkinskaia St., Moscow, 117418, Russia; e-mail: fok_mar@mail.ru).

Recommended citation

Fokina М.А. Dogovornye elementy v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Contractual Elements
in Civil Procedure]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure,
2020, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 118–130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-
2020-10-2-118-130

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

Keywords