Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS DRIP

PROBLEMS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE


L.A. TEREKHOVA

L.A. TEREKHOVA,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor,
Head of the Department of Civil and Arbitration Procedure,
Dostoevsky Omsk State University

DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-3-30-50

Prospects for the further development of administrative proceedings are very uncertain due
to the high proportion of unpredictability in the legislative process. The most dangerous is the
possible movement of administrative proceedings towards proceedings on cases of bringing
to administrative responsibility. Similar proposals have already been made in the scientific
literature, a tendency has been observed in the legislation to build the Code of Administrative
Procedure not only as a law on disputes between a private person and a public subject (appeal
against the actions and decisions of officials), but also as a way of bringing citizens to various
kinds of responsibility. Among researches, proposals are being made to create a scientific basis
for administrative proceedings and to create a new administrative procedural form. Some
authors are ready to argue that a similar form, in connection with the adoption of the Code
of Administrative Procedure, has already been created. Such a conclusion seems premature.
Administrative proceedings (as proceedings in cases arising from public legal relations), which
chose the civil procedural form, allow its participants to be equal parties in the process, and
the weak side not to fall to the position of the violator, unequal in the fight for their rights
with the administrative machine, to the level subject awaiting administrative punishment.
In determining the role of proceedings in cases arising from public relations, it is necessary
to remember the constitutional right to judicial protection from decisions and actions of
officials, and the function of judicial control over other branches of government.

Keywords: civil procedural form; administrative procedural form; administrative
proceedings; administrative procedure; proceedings, arising from public relations;
administrative offenses; judicial defence; judicial control.

References

Alekseev S.S. Problemy teorii prava. Kurs lektsii [Problems of the Theory of Law.
Lecture Course]. In Alekseev S.S. Sobranie sochinenii: v 10 t. T. 3 [Collected Works. In
10 vols. Vol. 3]. Moscow: Statut, 2010. 781 p. (In Russ.)
Argounov A.V. Osoboe proizvodstvo v grazhdanskom protsessual’nom prave Rossii
i Frantsii [Special Proceedings in Civil Procedural Law of Russia and France]. Moscow:
Prospekt, 2013. 292 p. (In Russ.)
Bonner A.T. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: mif ili
real’nost’, ili spor protsessualista s administrativistom [Administrative Proceedings in
the Russian Federation: Myth or Reality, or Dispute Between a Processist and an Administrativist].
Zakon – Law, 2016, no. 7, pp. 24–51. (In Russ.)
Bonner A.T. Predislovie k uchebniku po administrativnomu sudoproizvodstvu, ili kratkaia
istoriia rossiiskoi administrativnoi iustitsii [Preface to the Textbook on Administrative
Proceedings, or a Brief History of Russian Administrative Justice]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2019, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 31–51. (In Russ.)
Degtiarev S.L. Chastnoe i publichnoe v protsessual’nom prave [Private and Public in
Procedural Law]. In Iarkov V.V. (ed.). Rossiiskii ezhegodnik grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo
protsessa. № 2. 2002–2003 [Russian Yearbook of Civil and Arbitration Procedure.
No. 2. 2002–2003]. St. Petersburg, 2004, pp. 9–15. (In Russ.)
Grechkina O.V. Razvitie nauchnykh idei dolzhno osnovyvat’sia na modernizatsii
sovremennogo administrativnogo protsessual’nogo zakonodatel’stva [The Development
of Scientific Ideas Should Be Based on the Modernization of Modern Administrative
Procedural Legislation]. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess – Administrative Law and
Procedure, 2018, no. 9, pp. 7–10. (In Russ.)
Gromoshina N.A. Differentsiatsiia, unifikatsiia i uproshchenie v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve
[Differentiation, Unification and Simplification in Civil Proceedings]. Moscow:
Prospekt, 2010. 262 p. (In Russ.)
Gromoshina N.A. O edinstve protsessa i meste administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva
v sisteme rossiiskogo prava: prodolzhenie diskussii [On the Unity of Procedure and the
Place of Administrative Proceedings in the System of Russian Law: Continuation of
the Discussion]. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess – Administrative Law and Procedure,
2018, no. 3, pp. 42–46. (In Russ.)
Gromoshina N.A. O printsipe aktivnosti suda v administrativnom sudoproizvodstve
[On the Principle of Court Activity in Administrative Proceedings]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2019, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 96–112. (In Russ.)
Grubtsova S.P. Pravovye prezumptsii v sudebnom administrativnom protsessual’nom
prave: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Legal Presumptions in Judicial Administrative
Procedural Law: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Yekaterinburg,
2018. 30 p. (In Russ.)
Nauchno-prakticheskaia konferentsiia po voprosam primeneniia Kodeksa administrativnogo
sudoproizvodstva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Scientific-Practical Conference on
the Application of the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation].
Administrativnoe pravo i protsess – Administrative Law and procedure, 2016, no. 7,
pp. 79–82. (In Russ.)
Nikitin S.V. Problemy reformirovaniia zakonodatel’stva ob administrativnoi otvetstvennosti
iuridicheskikh lits v sfere ekonomicheskoi deiatel’nosti [Problems of Reforming
the Legislation on the Administrative Responsibility of Legal Entities in the Field of
Economic Activity]. Zakon – Law, 2016, no. 3, pp. 104–110. (In Russ.)
Novikov A.V. Administrativno-protsessual’naia forma: nauchnye i pravovye realii
[Administrative Procedure Form: Scientific and Legal Realities]. Administrativnoe pravo
i protsess – Administrative Law and Procedure, 2015, no. 11, pp. 70–80. (In Russ.)
Papulova Z.A. Uskorennye formy rassmotreniia del v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve:
avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Expedited Forms of Consideration of Cases in
Civil Proceedings: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Yekaterinburg,
2013. 26 p. (In Russ.)
Riasina N. Dvulikii Ianus [Two-Faced Ianus]. ezh-Iurist – ej-Lawyer, 2015, no. 9, p. 3.
(In Russ.)
Sakhnova T.V. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo: problemy samoidentifikatsii
[Administrative Proceedings: Problems of Self-Identification]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii
protsess – Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2016, no. 9, pp. 35–40. (In Russ.)
Semenov V.M. K voprosu o tsennosti grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava i grazhdanskoi
protsessual’noi formy [On the Value of Civil Procedural Law and Civil Procedural
Form]. In Iarkov V.V. (ed.). Kratkaia antologiia ural’skoi protsessual’noi mysli [Brief
Anthology of the Ural Procedural Thought]. Yekaterinburg: Publishing House of University
of Humanities, 2004. 652 p. (In Russ.)
Sergun A.K., Shakarian M.S. K voprosu o teorii tak nazyvaemoi «iuridicheskoi
protsessual’noi formy» [On the Theory of the So-Called “Legal Procedural Form”]. Shakarian
M.S. Izbrannye trudy [Selected Works]. St. Petersburg: R. Aslanov Publishing
House “Iuridicheskii tsentr Press”, 2014, pp. 160–195 (In Russ.)
Shadlovskaia O.D. Uproshchennaia grazhdanskaia protsessual’naia forma v grazhdanskom
sudoproizvodstve: poniatie i priznaki [Simplified Civil Procedural Form in Civil
Proceedings: Concept and Features]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess – Arbitration
and Civil Procedure, 2015, no. 8, pp. 19–23. (In Russ.)
Shchepalov S.V. Ob usmotrenii suda v ramkakh administrativnoi protsessual’noi formy
[On the Discretion of the Court Within the Framework of the Administrative Procedural
Form]. Rossiiskaia iustitsiia – Russian Justice, 2015, no. 6, pp. 42–46. (In Russ.)
Starilov Iu.N. Administrativnoe sudoproizvodstvo i administrativnye protsedury:
k sistemnomu vzaimodeistviiu i nadlezhashchemu urovniu pravovoi reglamentatsii
[Administrative Proceedings and Administrative Procedures: Towards Systemic Interaction
and an Appropriate Level of Legal Regulation]. Administrativnoe pravo i protsess –
Administrative Law and Procedure, 2018, no. 3, pp. 7–23. (In Russ.)
Terekhova L.A. Pravovaia politika v otnoshenii organov administrativnoi iurisdiktsii
(na primere arbitrazhnykh sudov) [Legal Policy in Relation to Bodies of Administrative
Jurisdiction (on the Example of Arbitration Courts)]. Vestnik OmGU. Seriia «Pravo» –
Herald of Omsk State University. Series “Law”, 2018, no. 4, pp. 44–48. (In Russ.)
Terekhova L.A. Sudebnoe administrativnoe protsessual’noe pravo v. administrativnoe
sudebnoe pravo [Judicial Administrative Procedural Law vs. Administrative Judicial
Law]. Pravoprimenenie – Law Enforcement, 2019, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 125–134. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

L.A. Terekhova (Omsk, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Head of the
Department of Civil and Arbitration Procedure, Dostoevsky Omsk State University
(11 Neftezavodskaia St., Omsk, 644053, Russia; e-mail: lydia@civpro.info).

Recommended citation

Terekhova L.A. Dreif administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva [Administrative Proceedings
Drip]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10,
no. 3, pp. 30–50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-3-30-50

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

Keywords