Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

Information Technology in the Practice of Arbitration Courts

PROBLEMS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE


L.A. Terekhova

L.A. TEREKHOVA, 
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Civil and Arbitration Procedure 
of the Dostoevsky Omsk State University 

DOI: 10.24031/2226- 0781-2017-7-6-34-42

The author examines the experience of using of information technologies in the practice of arbitration courts of the Russian Federation. In the introduction of electronic technologies into litigation it is important to observe the following rule: they must only be a tool helping to perform all the same procedural actions as before, and not a new type of litigation. Technologies shall not change the essence of procedural actions. Intermediate results of the introduction of information and communication technology into arbitration procedure allow us to assess the degree of development of «electronic justice» as an initial one, displaying many problems that require both technical and legislative solution. Judges have some observations concerning the functioning of certain services, but generally it is recognized that electronic technologies partially exempt them from technical work, simplify paperwork, help to study legislation and practice. It is generally accepted that new technologies have increased the level of awareness of stakeholders about the progress of the case. An important matter to preserve the application of the principles of justice is to keep such an element of evidentiary activity as the study of evidence. Otherwise all achievements of electronic technologies in the sphere of access to justice, transparency of courts’ activities and their new level are simply nullified. 

Keywords: electronic litigation; electronic technologies; information technology; summary proceedings; principles of justice; arbitration courts; electronic form of application; court personnel; court web site; evidentiary activity. 

References 

Balashov A.N., Efremova N.G. Razvitie elektronnykh tehnologii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Development of Electronic Technologies in Civil Procedure]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2016, no. 8. (In Russian)
Gascon Inchausti F. Electronic Service of Documents: National and International Aspects. In Kengyel M. (ed.). Electronic Justice – Present and Future. University of Pecs, 2010. 
Greger R. Sud’ya kak internet-serfer. Vyyasnenie obstoyatel’stv dela v Internete [Judge as an Internet Surfer. Identification of the Circumstances of the Case on the Internet]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 4. (In Russian) 
Kantser U. Plusy i minusy elektronnogo pravosudya [Advantages and Disadvantages of Electronic Justice]. ezh-Yurist = ezh-Lawyer, 2016, no. 5. (In Russian) 
Kondurina U.V. Realizatsiya printsipov arbitrazhnogo i grazhdanskogo protsessa v uproshchennom proizvodstve [Realization of Principles of Arbitration and Civil Procedure in Summary Proceedings]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 1. (In Russian) 
Laptev V.A. Electronnye dokazatelstva v arbitrazhnom protsesse [Electronic Evidences in Arbitration Procedure]. Rossiyskaya yustitsia = Russian Justice, 2017, no. 2. (In Russian) 
Lazarev S.V. Napravleniya razvitiya informatsionno-kommunikatsionnykh tekhnologii v Rossii [Ways of Development of the Information and Communication Technologies in Russia]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2014, no. 8. (In Russian) 
Ponomarenko V.A. Federalny zakon No. 86-FZ – vazhny shag na puti k elektronnomu pravosudiyu [The Federal Law No. 86-FZ is an Important Step on the Way to Electronic Justice]. Zakon = Law, 2012, no. 10. (In Russian) 
Reshetnyak V.I., Smagina E.S. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve (rossiisky i zarubezhny opyt) [Information Technologies in Civil Procedure (Russian and Foreign Experience)]. Moscow, 2017. (In Russian) 
Stepanov O.V. Nekotorye aspekty razvitiya elektronnogo sudoproizvodstva v grazhdanskom protsesse v Respublike Belarus’ [Some Issues of Development of Electronic Justice in Civil Procedure in the Republic of Belarus]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 5. (In Russian) 
Terekhova L.A. Beskontaktnoe pravosudie [Non-Contact Justice]. In Aktualnye problemy grazhdanskogo protsessualnogo prava [Actual Problems of Civil Procedure Law]. Moscow, 2017. (In Russian) 
Vlasov E.V. Dostupnost’ pravosudiya v administrativnom sudoproizvodstve [Access to Justice in Administrative Procedure]: Dissertation … Candidate of Legal Sciences. Moscow. 2017. (In Russian) 

Information about the author 

Terekhova L.A. (Omsk, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Civil and Arbitration Procedure of the Dostoevsky Omsk State University (644065, Omsk, 50 let Profsoyuzov St., 100/1; e-mail: lydia@civpro.info). 

Recommended citation 

Terekhova L.A. Informatsionnye tekhnologii v praktike arbitrazhnykh sudov [Information Technology in the Practice of Arbitration Courts]. Вестник гражданского процесса = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 6, p. 34–42. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226- 0781-2017-7-6-34-42

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

Keywords