We in a citing index:
Procedural Offence: The Concept and Characteristics
D.A. LIPINSKY,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor,
Professor of the Department of Theory of State and Law
of the Togliatti State University
E.V. CHUKLOVA,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law,
Civil Procedure and Employment and Labor Law of the Togliatti State University
The article examines the concept and characteristics of a procedural offence based on the general characteristics of an offence, as they correlate to each other as the categories of genus and species. Therefore, the characteristics inherent to the general concept have a peculiar interpretation in the specific concept. The article studies such characteristics of a procedural offence as an action, blame; illegality; punishability. Special attention is given to the most controversial characteristics of a procedural offence – punishability and guiltiness, as well as to certain characteristics of an action. The authors base their approach on a narrow view of a legal process and believe that a legal process does not necessarily exist everywhere where there is a legal procedure. The concept of a procedural offence is defined under this approach. Considering blame as a general characteristic of an offence, the authors concede some exceptions as applied to procedural offences. This conclusion is based on the legal position of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation which points out that an exception from the principle of guiltiness must be clearly expressed in the law. However, this is an exception and not a general rule. Thus, the concept of a procedural offense should involve the characteristic of blame. The authors come to a conclusion that a procedural offense is an illegal guiltily committed socially dangerous act which is committed by a legally accountable subject and there is a procedural responsibility provided for committing such an act.
Keywords: offence; procedural offence; procedural responsibility; measures of procedural responsibility; social danger.
References
Afonina E.V. K voprosu o roli protsessual’nogo regulirovaniya v nalogovom prave [On the Issue of the Procedural Regulation Role in Taxation Law]. Nalogi = Taxes, 2014, no. 2. (In Russian)
Akhanov V.I. Protsessual’nye sanktsii kak posledstviya protsessual’nykh pravonarushenii [Procedural Sanctions as the Consequences of Procedural Offences]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Volgograd State University, Series 5, Jurisprudence, 2013, no. 3(20). (In Russian)
Benedik I.V., Gorshenev V.M. (eds.). Teoriya yuridicheskogo protsessa [The Theory of Legal Process]. Kharkov, 1985. (In Russian)
Butnev V.V. Grazhdanskoe protsessual’noe pravonarushenie kak osnovanie grazhdanskoi protsessual’noi otvetstvennosti [A Civil Procedural Offence as the Basis of Civil Procedural Responsibility]. In Yuridicheskaya otvetstvennost’: problemy i perspektivy. Trudy po pravovedeniyu [Legal Responsibility: Problems and Prospects. Works on Legal Studies]. Tartu, 1989. (In Russian)
Chechina N.A., El’kind P.S. Ob ugolovno-protsessual’noi i grazhdanskoi protsessual’noi otvetstvennosti [On Criminal Procedural and Civil Procedural Responsibility]. In Chechina N.A. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu protsessu [Selected Works on Civil Procedure]. St. Petersburg, 2004. (In Russian)
Chuklova E.V. Ponyatie, osnovanie i vidy protsessual’noi otvetstvennosti: teoreticheskii aspect [The Concept, Basis and Types of Procedural Responsibility: Theoretical Aspect]. Krasnodar, 2009. (In Russian)
Denisov Yu.A. Obshchaya teoriya pravonarusheniya i otvetstvennosti [General Theory of Offense and Responsibility]. St. Petersburg, 1983. (In Russian)
Gal’perin M.L. Otvetstvennost’ v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Liability in Civil Proceedings]. Moscow, 2011. (In Russian)
Galuzin A.F. Pravonarusheniya kak osnovnaya ugroza pravovoi i sotsial’noi bezopasnosti [Offenses as the Main Threat to Legal and Social Safety]. Samara, 2007. (In Russian)
Gladkikh V.I. Priglashenie k diskussii: vse li nas ustraivaet v sovremennykh formakh viny i praktike ikh primeneniya? [An Invitation to Discussion: Are We Satisfied with Everything in the Modern Forms of Blame and the Practice of Their Application]. Rossiiskii sledovatel’ = Russian Investigator, 2016, no. 3. (In Russian)
Ioffe O.S., Shargorodsky M.D. Voprosy teorii prava [Questions of the Theory of Law]. Moscow, 1961. (In Russian)
Kudryavtsev V.N. Pravo i povedenie [Law and Behavior]. Moscow, 1978. (In Russian)
Kudryavtsev V.N. Pravovoe povedenie: norma i patologiya [Legal Behavior: Norm and Pathology]. Moscow, 1982. (In Russian)
Kudryavtsev V.N. Zakon, postupok, otvetstvennost’ [Law, Act, Responsibility]. Moscow, 1986. (In Russian)
Leist O.E. Sanktsii i otvetstvennost’ po sovetskomu pravu [Sanctions and Responsibility under Soviet Law]. Moscow, 1981. (In Russian)
Lipinsky D.A., Musatkina A.A. Obshchestvennaya opasnost’ pravonarusheniya v nauchnykh i zakonodatel’nykh opredeleniyakh Rossii i zarubezhnykh stran [Social Danger of Offence in Scientific and Legislative Definitions of Russia and Foreign Countries]. Voprosy bezopasnosti = Questions of Safety, 2015, no. 3. (In Russian)
Lipinsky D.A., Velikosel’skaya I.E. K voprosu o sostave konstitutsionnykh pravonarushenii [On the Issue of the Components of Constitutional Offences]. Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal’noe pravo= Constitutional and Municipal Law, 2016, no. 9. (In Russian)
Malinovsky A.A. Zloupotreblenie sub’ektivnym pravom (teoretiko-pravovoe issledovanie) [Abuse of Subjective Law (Theoretical and Legal Study)]. Moscow, 2007. (In Russian)
Matuzova N.I., Mal’ko A.V. (eds.). Teoriya gosudarstva i prava [Theory of State and Law]. Moscow, 2012. (In Russian)
Paraskevova S.A. Ponyatie i sotsial’naya sushchnost’ grazhdanskogo pravonarusheniya (teoreticheskie problemy) [The Concept and Social Essence of a Civil Offence (Theoretical Issues)]: Dissertation … Doctor of Legal Sciences. Moscow, 2007. (In Russian)
Parfir’ev D.N. Problemy shtrafnoi grazhdansko-protsessual’noi otvetstvennosti [Problems of Punitive Civil Procedural Responsibility]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2014, no. 3. (In Russian)
Salishcheva N.G. Administrativno-protsessual’nye aspekty garantii prav grazhdan [Administrative and Procedural Aspects of the Guarantees of Citizens’ Rights]. In Khamaneva N.Yu. Administrativno-pravovoj status grazhdanina: Sbornik statej [Administrative and Legal Status: Collection of Articles]. Moscow, 2004. (In Russian)
Samoshchenko I.S. Ponyatie pravonarusheniya po sovetskomu zakonodatel’stvu [The Concept of Offence under the Soviet Law]. Moscow, 1963. (In Russian)
Simonov I.D. Narushenie prava na sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyi srok kak grazhdanskoe protsessual’noe pravonarushenie [The Violation of the Right to Court Procedure in a Reasonable Time as a Civil Procedural Offence]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2013, no. 10. (In Russian)
Skachkova O.S. Protsessual’naya otvetstvennost’: ponyatie i soderzhanie [Procedural Responsibility: The Concept and Content]: Dissertation … Candidate of Legal Sciences. Samara, 2007. (In Russian)
Smolin S.V. Konkurentsiya ugolovno-pravovykh i administrativno-deliktnykh norm, reglamentiruyushchikh otvetstvennost’ za narusheniya v sfere migratsionnogo ucheta [Competition of Criminal-Legal and Administrative-Delictual Norms Regulating the Responsibility for Violations in the Area of Migration Registration]. Ugolovnoe pravo = Criminal Law, 2016, no. 2. (In Russian)
Stasyuk I.V. Posledstviya neispolneniya sudom protsessual’nykh obyazannostei [Consequences of the Court Failure to Execute Its Procedural Duties]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2011, no. 11. (In Russian) Vasil’ev S.V. K voprosu o sudebno-protsessual’noi deliktologii (na primere zakonodatel’stva Ukrainy) [On the Issue of Judicial Procedural Delictology (on the Example of the Legislation of Ukraine)]. Rossiiskii sud’ya = Russian Judge, 2011, no. 12. (In Russian)
Voplenko N.N. Ocherki obshchei teorii prava [Essays in General Theory of Law]. Volgograd, 2009. (In Russian)
Yudin A.V. Grazhdanskoe protsessual’noe pravonarushenie i otvetstvennost’ [Civil Procedural Offence and Responsibility]. St. Petersburg, 2009. (In Russian)
Zaryan D.G. Ob’ektivnaya storona pravonarusheniya [Objective Side of Offence]: Dissertation … Candidate of Legal Sciences. Kazan, 2006. (In Russian)
Zhil’tsova N.A., Golichenko M.M. Grazhdanskaya protsessual’naya otvetstvennost’: ponyatie i osnovaniya [Civil Procedural Responsibility: Concept and Bases]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2008, nos. 7–8. (In Russian)
Information about the authors
Lipinsky D.A. (Togliatti, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Theory of State and Law of the Togliatti State University (45000, Togliatti, Belorusskaya St., 14; e-mail: [email protected]);
Chuklova E.V. (Togliatti, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Law, Civil Procedure and Employment and Labor Law of the Togliatti State University (45000, Togliatti, Belorusskaya St., 14; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Lipinsky D.A., Chuklova E.V. Protsessual’noe pravonarushenie: ponyatie i priznaki [Procedural Offence: The Concept and Characteristics]. Вестник гражданского процесса = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 4, p. 39–61. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226- 0781-2017-7-4-39-61
D.A. Lipinsky, E.V. Chuklova
Advertisement
Our partners
