We in a citing index:
Legal Nature and Procedural Features of the Function of Court Assistance Regarding Arbitration
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor,
Head of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure
of the Voronezh State University
The article analyzes a new category of cases related with the court assistance regarding arbitration. The author notes that recent changes of the Civil Procedure Code and the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation are logical step as far as institute of private arbitration and state courts interwork together for a list of issues, and it is necessary to coordinate and regulate them. In civil procedure there is a new category of cases, where a court has not a control function but function of assistance in relation to arbitration courts. The procedural features in comparative to the cases in which the court performs the function of control over arbitration are revealed. Attention is drawn to specific object of court assistance, scope of persons who have the right to apply to the court to application on assistance, territorial jurisdiction, pre-trial claim, inadmissibility of the court’s ruling appeal and other. The issues of court possibility to examine of arbitration agreement on the subject of it validity during the consideration of the assistance questions and need for relevant information in order to the court may appoint the arbitrator and other issues are discussed.
Keywords: arbitration; arbitration agreement; arbitral tribunal; formation of arbitral tribunal; function of court assistance regarding arbitration; kinds of civil proceedings.
Kurochkin S.A. Gosudarstvennye sudy v tretejskom razbiratel’stve i mezhdunarodnom kommercheskom arbitrazhe [State Courts in Arbitration Trial and International Commercial Arbitration]. Moscow, 2008. (In Russian)
Makovsky A.L., Sukhanov E.A. (eds.). Kommentarij k Federal’nomu zakonu «O tretejskih sudah v Rossijskoj Federatsii» [Comment to the Federal Law «On Arbitration (Trial) in the Russian Federation»]. Moscow, 2003. (In Russian)
Nosyreva E.I. Vidy sovremennogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva i ih klassifikatsiya [Types of Contemporary Civil Proceedings and Its Classification]. In Treushnikov M.K. (ed.). Zametki o sovremennom grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsessual’nom prave [Notes on Contemporary Civil and Arbitration Procedural Law]. Moscow, 2004. (In Russian)
Skvortsova O.Yu., Savransky M.Yu. (eds.). Kommentarij k Federal’nomu zakonu «Ob arbitrazhe (tretejskom razbiratel’stve) v Rossijskoj Federatsii» (postatejnyj, nauchno-prakticheskij) [Comment to the Federal Law «On Arbitration (Trial) in the Russian Federation » (Itemized, Science-Practical)]. Moscow, 2016. (In Russian)
Terehova L.A. Vypolnenie sudami funktsij sodejstviya v otnoshenii tretejskih sudov [Performance by Courts of Assistance Functions in Respect of Arbitration]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2016, no. 6. (In Russian)
Zvereva N.S. Vzaimodejstvie al’ternativnyh metodov uregulirovaniya sporov i grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva v prave Rossii i Frantsii [Interrelation of Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution and Civil Procedure in Law of Russia and France]: Dissertation … Candidate of Legal Sciences. Yekaterinburg, 2016. (In Russian)
Information about the author
Nosyreva E.I. (Voronezh, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure of the Voronezh State University (394006, Voronezh, pl. Lenin, 10a, bldg. 9, room 710; e-mail: email@example.com).
Nosyreva E.I. Pravovaya priroda i osobennosti proizvodstva po delam, svyazannym s vypolneniem sudami funktsij sodejstviya v otnoshenii tretejskih sudov [Legal Nature and Procedural Features of the Function of Court Assistance Regarding Arbitration]. Вестник гражданского процесса = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 3, p. 79–100. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2017-7-4-79-100