We in a citing index:
Court Arbitrage Practice in the Case of Compensation for Outrage on Legal Procedure in Reasonable Time or Performing Right of Judicial Act in Reasonable Time: Civil Law Aspects
COURT ARBITRAGE PRACTICE IN THE CASE OF COMPENSATION FOR OUTRAGE
ON LEGAL PROCEDURE IN REASONABLE TIME OR PERFORMING RIGHT OF JUDICIAL
ACT IN REASONABLE TIME: CIVIL LAWASPECTS
R.F. ZAKIROV,
Assistant of the Civil Procedural Law Department,
Kazan Branch of the Russian State University of Justice
The article deals with the analysis of Court arbitrage practice in the case of compensation for outrage on legal procedure in reasonable time or performing right of judicial act in reasonable time, the influence of this institute on the increase of legal procedure effectiveness. The article examines civil aspects, the mechanisms of the compensation, the comparison of moral damage compensation. The author underlines the necessity of unification of the compensation norms for violation of legal procedure period in civil and arbitrage procedural law in connection with last changes in legislation. The article depicts the civil essence of the analyzed institution, the necessity of concrete changes in the normative base, concerning the compensation for the red-tape. The approach to determination of the compensation size on the basis of the subject composition of the dispute is formed.
Keywords: compensation, arbitrage process, arbitrage legal procedure, civil law.
References
Afanas’ev S.F., Makarova N.A. Uridicheskaya priroda kompensatsii, prisuzdaemoy za narushenie prava na sudoproizvodstvo ili ispolnenie sudebnogo akta v razumniy srok, i ee svyaz’ s tsivilisticheskim protsesom (v svete KAS Rossii) [The legal nature of compensation awarded for the violation of the right to trial or the execution of a judicial act within a reasonable time and its relationship with the civil law process(КАP of Russia)]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika = Laws of Russia: experience, analysis, practice. 2016. No. 5. P. 10–16. (In Russian).
Andreev Yu. N. Grazhdansko–pravovaya otvetstvennost’ gosudarstva po deliktnym obyazatel’stvam [Civil liability of state for tortious obligations]. SPb., 2006. (In Russian)
Chelishev M. Yu. Ponyatie, formy, vidy mezhotraslevykh svyazee grazhdanskogo prava [The concept, forms, types of interbranch ties of the civil law] Bisnes, menedzhment i pravo = Business, management and law. (In Russian).
Mihaylenko O.V. Imushchestvennaya otvetstvennost’ za vred, prichenennyy osushchestvleniem publichnoy vlasti:teoreticheskie aspekty i problemy ее realizachii na praktike [Property liability for damage caused by the execution of public authority: theoretical aspects and problems of its implementation in practice]. M., 2007. P. 41–47. (In Russian).
Information about the author:
Zakirov R.F. (Kazan) – Assistant of the Civil Procedural Law Department, Kazan Branch of the Russian State University of Justice (420028, Republic of Tatarstan, Kazan, 2 Azinskaya st. 7a, room 214; e-mail: [email protected]).
R.F. Zakirov
Advertisement
Our partners
