We in a citing index:
Chevalier Sans Peur et Sans Reproche. The Courts of the Russian Federation and Germany in the Way of Direct Application of the ECHR Acts in Civil Proceedings
СHEVALIER SANS PEUR ET SANS REPROCHE.
THE COURTS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND GERMANY IN THE WAY OF DIRECT
APPLICATION OF THE ECHR ACTS IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
O.S. Zharkovа,
Postgraduate student of All-Russian State University of Justice,
Director of law firm “Zharkovа and Partners” (Smolensk), DAAD scholarship in 2015
The article deals with the scientific views on the direct application of acts of the European Court, regardless of the country-defendant (erga omnes), and the practice of such application for 2013–2015 in civil procedure of the Russian Federation and Germany. Among other things, the tendencies of territorial asymmetry of judicial activity, inherent in both countries, as well as other characteristics that may be used for formation of a national legal policy in this sphere.
Keywords: ECHR; ECHR; civil procedure in Germany; Russian civil procedure; erga omnes.
References
Jaeger R., Schmalz C. Die deutsche Rechtsprechung und der EGMR. Kooperation oder Konfrontation? Vom Recht auf Menschenwürde, hggb. Von Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger. Mohr Siebeck, 2013.
Steinfatt G., Die Unparteilichkeit des Richters in Europäischen Gerichtshofs für Menschenrechte. Nomos, 2011.
Peters A. Wie wichtig ist Straßburg?. Betritt Justiz. 2007. No. 91. P. 106–111.
Aver‘janov K.Ju. Dejstvie reshenij Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v ramkah rossijskoj pravovoj sistemy [Action of the European Court of Human Rights in the framework of the Russian legal system]. Aktual’nye problemy rossijskogo prava = Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2013. No. 5. P. 619–626. (In Russian).
Zhilin G.A. Reshenija Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka v sisteme istochnikov grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo processual’nogo prava [Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in the system of civil and arbitration procedural law sources]. Zhurnal konstitucionnogo pravosudija = Journal of Constitutional Justice. 2009. No. 1. P. 23–29. (In Russian).
Rehtina I.V. Problemy vzaimodejstvija Rossijskoj Federacii s Evropejskim sudom po pravam cheloveka [Problems of interaction of Russian Federation with the European Court of Human Rights]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij process = Arbitration and civil procedure. 2013. No. 1. P. 44–48. (In Russian)
Rehtina I.V. Postanovlenija Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka kak faktor, obuslovlivajushhij dinamiku grazhdanskogo processual’nogo zakonodatel’stva Rossii [Resolution of the European Court of Human Rights as the factors contributing to the dynamics of the civil procedural legislation of Russia]. Sovremennoe parvo = Contemporary Law. 2011. No. 4. P. 13–16. (In Russian).
Sahnova T.V. Civilisticheskij process: missija v menjajushhemsja mire [Civil process: the mission in a changing world]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo processa = Herald of Civil procedure. 2013. No. 1. P. 14–33. (In Russian).
Sultanov A.R. O nekotoryh processual’nyh posledstvijah postanovlenij ESPCh [On some procedural consequences of ECtHR judgments]. Rossijskaja justicija = Russian justice. 2014. No. 1. P. 24–29. (In Russian).
Horinoev A.O. Vlijanie pravovyh pozicij Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka na grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo [Influence of the legal positions of the European Court of Human Rights to the civil proceedings]. Administrator suda = Manager of the Court. 2014. No. 1. P. 48–53. (In Russian).
Information about the author:
Zharkova O.S. (Smolensk) – Graduate student of All-Russian State University of Justice (214013, Smolensk, Vorobyov st., 17, e-mail: [email protected]).
O.S. Zharkova
Advertisement
Our partners
