About Effective Remedies from Unjustified Restoration of Procedural Period

Keywords: restoration of period; motivation; appeal; termination of proceedings; arbitration procedure.

References

Afanasyev S.F. Pravo na poluchenie motivirovannogo sudebnogo reshenija po grazhdanskomu delu (mezhdunarodnyj i natsional’nyj aspekty) [Right to Receiving a Reasoned Judgment in a Civil Case (International and National Aspects)]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2008, no. 12, pp. 13–16. (In Russian)

Belkin A.A. Analogija v gosudarstvennom prave [Analogy in Public Law]. Pravovede- nie = Jurisprudence, 1992, no. 6, p. 18. (In Russian)

Vasjaev A.A., Knjaz’kin S.A. Motivirovannost’ sudebnyh reshenij – standart Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [Motivation of Judgments – Standard of the European Court of Human Rights]. Advokat = Lawyer, 2013, no. 6, pp. 27–32. (In Russian)

Vikut M.A. Zakonnost’ i obosnovannost’ aktov sotsialisticheskogo pravosudija kak glavnoe uslovie vypolnenija zadach grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Legality and Validity of Acts of Socialist Justice as the Main Condition of the Accomplishment of Tasks of Civil Proceedings]. In Tsivilisticheskie problemy pravovogo statusa lichnosti v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve [Civil Problems of the Legal Status of the Individual in Socialist Society]. Saratov, 1982, p. 124. (In Russian)

Zagaynova S.K. Sudebnye akty v mehanizme realizatsii sudebnoj vlasti v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Judicial Acts in the Mechanism of Realization of the Judicial Authority in Civil and Arbitration Procedure]. Moscow, 2007, pp. 299–300. (In Russian)

Zaitsev I.M. Reshenie suda kak protsessual’nyj document [The Court’s Decision as a Procedural Document]. Vestnik SGAP = Herald of the SGAP, 1995, no. 2, p. 74. (In Russian)

Lesnitskaya L.F. Primenenie protsessual’nyh norm po analogii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [The Application of Procedural Rules by Analogy in Civil Proceedings]. In Yaroshenko K.B. (ed.). Kommentarij sudebnoj praktiki. Vyp. 13 [Commentary of Court’s Practice. Issue 13]. Moscow, 2007, pp. 107–116. (In Russian)

Polyakov Y.N. K voprosu o nezavisimosti suda [To the Issue of Independence of the Court]. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2000, no. 10, p. 85. (In Russian)

Ponomarenko V.A. Motivirovannost’ sudebnogo reshenija v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Motivation of the Judgment in Civil and Arbitration Procedure]. St. Petersburg, 2009, p. 91. (In Russian)

Rabtsevich O.I. Pravo na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel’stvo: mezhdunarodnoe i vnutrigosudarstvennoe pravovoe regulirovanie [The Right to a Fair Trial: International and National Legal Regulations.]. Moscow, 2005, p. 136. (In Russian)

Ratushnaja B.P. Problemy motivirovannosti sudebnyh reshenij v Ukraine [Problems of Motivation of Judicial Decisions in Ukraine]. Pravo i politika = Law and Politics, 2013, no. 6, pp. 798–802. (In Russian)

Rehtina I.V. Analogija v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse: problemy teorii i praktiki primenenija [Analogy in Civil and Arbitration Procedure: Problems of Theory and Practice of Administration]. Sovremennoe pravo = Modern Right, 2009, no. 11, pp. 102–106. (In Russian)

Sultanov A.R. Mozhno li obzhalovat’ vosstanovlenie sroka? [Can I Appeal the Recovery Period?]. ezh-Jurist = ezh-Lawyer, 2015, nos. 1–2, p. 10. (In Russian)

Sultanov A.R. O probleme motivirovannosti sudebnyh aktov cherez prizmu postanovlenij Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [On the Issue of Motivation of Judicial Decisions through the Prism of the European Court of Human Rights]. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo = The International Public and Private Law, 2008, no. 2, pp. 11–13. (In Russian)

Sultanov A.R. Evropejskie pravovye standarty: uroki istorii i pravoprimenitel’naja praktika [European Legal Standards: Lessons of History and Practice]. Moscow, 2012, pp. 91–97. (In Russian)

Sultanov A.R. Motivirovannost’ sudebnogo akta kak odna iz osnovnyh problem spravedlivogo pravosudija [Motivation of the Judicial Act as One of the Main Problems of Fair Justice]. Zakon = Law, 2014, no. 8, pp. 114–118. (In Russian)

Sultanov A.R. Unifikatsija norm o peresmotre po vnov’ otkryvshimsja obstojatel’stvam kak sovershenstvovanie sredstv ispravlenija sudebnoj oshibki [Unification of Rules for Review of Newly Discovered Facts as the Improvement of Cures of a Judicial Error]. Zakon = Law, 2007, no. 11, pp. 99–113. (In Russian)

Tuzov N.A. Motivirovanie i prejuditsija sudebnyh aktov [Motivating and Prejudice of Judicial Acts]. Moscow, 2006. (In Russian)

 Information about the author:

Sultanov A.R. (Nizhnekamsk) – Head of the Legal Department of the PJSC «Nizhnekamskneftekhim» (423574, Tatarstan Republic, Nizhnekamsk city, PJSC «Nizhnekam- skneftekhim»; e-mail: [email protected]).