Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

About Effective Remedies from Unjustified Restoration of Procedural Period

A.R. Sultanov, 
Head of the Legal Department of the PJSC «Nizhnekamskneftekhim» 

The article deals with the problem of unjustified and unmotivated restoration of procedural period. The author has carried out its own search for effective remedies from such violations, and analyzed the practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, which also drew attention to this problem. Considering that for a long time unjustified unmotivated restoration of procedural period has been a negative reality of judicial practice, the author decided to share his ideas, and also pay attention to a new judicial practice, which, in the author’s opinion, will certainly be useful for those who will face the similar problem. The author notes that the right to appeal the determination of the restoration of period for appeal of a judicial act still exists and it follows from the obligation to ensure effective protection of violated rights, which is stipulated in section 13 of the Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms.

Keywords: restoration of period; motivation; appeal; termination of proceedings; arbitration procedure.

References

Afanasyev S.F. Pravo na poluchenie motivirovannogo sudebnogo reshenija po grazhdanskomu delu (mezhdunarodnyj i natsional’nyj aspekty) [Right to Receiving a Reasoned Judgment in a Civil Case (International and National Aspects)]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2008, no. 12, pp. 13–16. (In Russian)

Belkin A.A. Analogija v gosudarstvennom prave [Analogy in Public Law]. Pravovede- nie = Jurisprudence, 1992, no. 6, p. 18. (In Russian)

Vasjaev A.A., Knjaz’kin S.A. Motivirovannost’ sudebnyh reshenij – standart Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [Motivation of Judgments – Standard of the European Court of Human Rights]. Advokat = Lawyer, 2013, no. 6, pp. 27–32. (In Russian)

Vikut M.A. Zakonnost’ i obosnovannost’ aktov sotsialisticheskogo pravosudija kak glavnoe uslovie vypolnenija zadach grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Legality and Validity of Acts of Socialist Justice as the Main Condition of the Accomplishment of Tasks of Civil Proceedings]. In Tsivilisticheskie problemy pravovogo statusa lichnosti v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve [Civil Problems of the Legal Status of the Individual in Socialist Society]. Saratov, 1982, p. 124. (In Russian)

Zagaynova S.K. Sudebnye akty v mehanizme realizatsii sudebnoj vlasti v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Judicial Acts in the Mechanism of Realization of the Judicial Authority in Civil and Arbitration Procedure]. Moscow, 2007, pp. 299–300. (In Russian)

Zaitsev I.M. Reshenie suda kak protsessual’nyj document [The Court’s Decision as a Procedural Document]. Vestnik SGAP = Herald of the SGAP, 1995, no. 2, p. 74. (In Russian)

Lesnitskaya L.F. Primenenie protsessual’nyh norm po analogii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [The Application of Procedural Rules by Analogy in Civil Proceedings]. In Yaroshenko K.B. (ed.). Kommentarij sudebnoj praktiki. Vyp. 13 [Commentary of Court’s Practice. Issue 13]. Moscow, 2007, pp. 107–116. (In Russian)

Polyakov Y.N. K voprosu o nezavisimosti suda [To the Issue of Independence of the Court]. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2000, no. 10, p. 85. (In Russian)

Ponomarenko V.A. Motivirovannost’ sudebnogo reshenija v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Motivation of the Judgment in Civil and Arbitration Procedure]. St. Petersburg, 2009, p. 91. (In Russian)

Rabtsevich O.I. Pravo na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel’stvo: mezhdunarodnoe i vnutrigosudarstvennoe pravovoe regulirovanie [The Right to a Fair Trial: International and National Legal Regulations.]. Moscow, 2005, p. 136. (In Russian)

Ratushnaja B.P. Problemy motivirovannosti sudebnyh reshenij v Ukraine [Problems of Motivation of Judicial Decisions in Ukraine]. Pravo i politika = Law and Politics, 2013, no. 6, pp. 798–802. (In Russian)

Rehtina I.V. Analogija v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse: problemy teorii i praktiki primenenija [Analogy in Civil and Arbitration Procedure: Problems of Theory and Practice of Administration]. Sovremennoe pravo = Modern Right, 2009, no. 11, pp. 102–106. (In Russian)

Sultanov A.R. Mozhno li obzhalovat’ vosstanovlenie sroka? [Can I Appeal the Recovery Period?]. ezh-Jurist = ezh-Lawyer, 2015, nos. 1–2, p. 10. (In Russian)

Sultanov A.R. O probleme motivirovannosti sudebnyh aktov cherez prizmu postanovlenij Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [On the Issue of Motivation of Judicial Decisions through the Prism of the European Court of Human Rights]. Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo = The International Public and Private Law, 2008, no. 2, pp. 11–13. (In Russian)

Sultanov A.R. Evropejskie pravovye standarty: uroki istorii i pravoprimenitel’naja praktika [European Legal Standards: Lessons of History and Practice]. Moscow, 2012, pp. 91–97. (In Russian)

Sultanov A.R. Motivirovannost’ sudebnogo akta kak odna iz osnovnyh problem spravedlivogo pravosudija [Motivation of the Judicial Act as One of the Main Problems of Fair Justice]. Zakon = Law, 2014, no. 8, pp. 114–118. (In Russian)

Sultanov A.R. Unifikatsija norm o peresmotre po vnov’ otkryvshimsja obstojatel’stvam kak sovershenstvovanie sredstv ispravlenija sudebnoj oshibki [Unification of Rules for Review of Newly Discovered Facts as the Improvement of Cures of a Judicial Error]. Zakon = Law, 2007, no. 11, pp. 99–113. (In Russian)

Tuzov N.A. Motivirovanie i prejuditsija sudebnyh aktov [Motivating and Prejudice of Judicial Acts]. Moscow, 2006. (In Russian)

 Information about the author:

Sultanov A.R. (Nizhnekamsk) – Head of the Legal Department of the PJSC «Nizhnekamskneftekhim» (423574, Tatarstan Republic, Nizhnekamsk city, PJSC «Nizhnekam- skneftekhim»; e-mail: sultanovAR@nknh.ru).

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png


A.R. Sultanov