We in a citing index:
Purpose of Valuation Concepts for Procedural Law
G.E. Ageeva,
Postgraduate Student of the Department of Civil and Commercial Procedure
of the Samara State University of Economics
This article is considered the purpose of evaluative concepts in procedural law. Procedural law is not only the judiciary law, but also a number of positive procedures of enforcement and application of the law. The evaluative concepts helps implement the admissible type of legal regulation in the most complete way, because exactly these evaluative concepts with an open logical structure containing abstractly formulated normative legal regulation can be applied to various types of relationships allowing to take into account the nuances of the actual circumstances. In this regard such important goal of procedural law’s legal regulation is achieved as ensuring stability dynamism of relations. Regulatory flexibility provided by the presence of evaluative concepts contributes to the effectiveness of the legal process. The next important aspect of the evaluative concepts’ mission is directly related to the purpose of use in legal array of such structures – it is providing legal economy. In general their purpose is the regulatory and protective impact of legal norms, accessibility of understanding of the legal requirements and flexibility of legal regulation.
Keywords: evaluative concepts; procedural law; the purpose of evaluative concepts.
References
Bezrukov S.S. Otsenochnye ponyatiya i terminy v ugolovno-protsessual’nom zakonodatel’stve [Evaluative Concepts and Terms in the Criminal Law] (in Russian): Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Omsk, 2001.
Kudryavtsev V.N. Teoreticheskie osnovy kvalifikatsii prestupleny [Theoretical Foundations of Crimes’ Qualification] (in Russian). M., 1963.
Kashanina T.V. Otsenochnye ponyatiya v sovetskom prave [Evaluative Concepts in Soviet Law] (in Russian): Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Sverdlovsk, 1974.
Ageeva G.E. Razvitie nauchnykh predstavleny ob otsenochnykh ponyatiyakh [Development of Scientific Ideas about Evaluative Concepts] (in Russian) // Problems of Economics and Law. 2012. No. 6.
Levina D.N. Teoreticheskie problemy tolkovaniya i primeneniya otsenochnykh ponyaty [Theoretical Problems of Interpretation and Application of Evaluative Concepts] (in Russian): Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Nizhny Novgorod, 2007.
Fetisov O.E. Otsenochnye ponyatiya v prave. Problemy teorii i praktiki [Evaluative Concepts in Law. Theory and Practice] (in Russian): Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Tambov, 2009.
Ryasina A.S. Otsenochnye kategorii: obscheteoretichesky i nravstvenno-pravovoy aspekty [Evaluative Categories: General Theoretical, Moral and Legal Aspects] (in Russian): Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Saratov, 2013.
Pavlushina A.A. Teoriya yuridicheskogo protsessa: itogi, problemy, perspektivy razvitiya [The Theory of Legal Process: Results, Problems and Prospects of Development] (in Russian) / Ed. by V.M. Vedyakhin. Samara, 2005. P. 195.
Luk’yanova E.G. Protsessual’noe pravo i ego mesto v strukture prava [Procedural Law and Its Place in the Structure of Law] (in Russian): Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. M., 2000.
Protasov V.N. O nasuschnoy potrebnosti v novoy uchebnoy distsipline – «obschey teorii protsessual’nogo prava» [On the Urgent Need for a New Academic Discipline – the «General Theory of Procedural Law»] (in Russian) // State and Law. 2003. No. 12.
Sevast’yanov G.V. Al’ternativnoe razreshenie sporov – chastnoe protsessual’noe pravo [Alternative Dispute Resolution – Private Procedural Law] (in Russian) // Russian Yearbook of Civil and Arbitration Process. 2007. No. 6.
Sevast’yanov G.V. Kontseptsiya chastnogo protsessual’nogo prava (prava al’ternativnogo razresheniya sporov) [The Concept of Private Procedural Law (the law of alternative dispute resolution)] (in Russian) // Arbitrate Court. 2009. No. 1. P. 25–32.
Morozov M.E. Obschee opisanie kontseptsii chastnogo protsessual’nogo prava (prava ARS) [A General Description of the Concept of Private Procedural Law (ADR)] (in Russian) // Arbitrate Court. 2009. No. 1.
Morozov M.E. Chastnoe protsessual’noe pravo: tupikovaya vetv’ prava ili novy vektor ego razvitiya [Private Procedural Law: Dead-end Branch of Law or a New Vector of Its Development] (in Russian) // Arbitrate Court. 2010. No. 6.
Marchenko M.N., Deryabina E.M. Teoriya gosudarstva i prava: Ucheb.-metod. posobie [Theory of State and Law: Methodological Textbook] (in Russian). 2nd ed. M., 2012.
Rad’ko T.N. Teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie problemy funktsy sotsialisticheskogo prava [Theoretical and Methodological Problems of Socialist Law Functions] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Doctor of Legal Sciences. M., 1978.
Opalev R.O. Otsenochnye ponyatiya v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsessual’nom prave [Evaluation Concepts in Civil Procedural Law and Arbitration] (in Russian). M., 2008.
Alekseev S.S. Voskhozhdenie k pravu. Poiski i resheniya [Climbing to the Right. Searches and Solutions] (in Russian). M., 2001. Zakharov A.L. Mezhotraslevye printsipy prava [Interbranch Principles of Law] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Kazan, 2003.
Shamshurin L.L. Printsipy grazhdanskogo (arbitrazhnogo) protsessual’nogo prava: problemy ponyatiya, klassifikatsii, znachenie v sovershenstvovanii zakonodatel’stva i otpravlenii pravosudiya [Principles of Civil (Arbitration) Procedural Law: Problems of Concept, Classification, the Value in Improving Legislation and the Administration of Justice] (in Russian) // Arbitrate and Civil Procedure. 2010. No. 7.
Praktika primeneniya Grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Prakt. posobie [Practical Application of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: A Practical Guide] (in Russian) / Ed. by V.M. Zhuykov. M., 2005.
Bogdanovich S.P. Otsenochnye ponyatiya v veschnom i obyazatel’stvennom prave [Evaluative Concepts in Material and Obligations Law] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Krasnodar, 2012.
Mal’ko A.V. Ogranichivayuschaya funktsiya yuridicheskogo protsessa [Limiting Feature of the Legal Process] (in Russian) // Jurisprudence. 1996. No. 5.
Piskunova O.V. Funktsii norm rossiyskogo prava [Functions of Russian Law Rules] (in Russian): Abstract of Dissertation. Candidate of Legal Sciences. Saratov, 2013.
Kharlashina G.E. Naznachenie advokata v kachestve predstavitelya sudom [Assignment of Counsel as the Representative by Court] (in Russian) // Lawyer Practice. 2010. No. 4.
Zakonotvorchestvo v Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Nauch.-prakt. i ucheb. posobie [Lawmaking in the Russian Federation: Theoretical and Practical Textbook] (in Russian) / Ed. by A.S. Pigolkin. M., 2000.
Ignatenko V.V. Otsenochnye ponyatiya i administrativno-deliktny zakon [Evaluative Concepts and Administrative and Delictual Law] (in Russian). Irkutsk, 1996.
Information about the author
Ageeva G.E. (Samara) – Postgraduate Student of the Department of Civil and Commercial Procedure of the Samara State University of Economics (443090, Samara city, Soviet Army st., 141; e-mail: [email protected]).
G.E. Ageeva
Advertisement
Our partners
