We in a citing index:
On the Law of the Promissory Note of a Creditor to Apply to the Court with the Claim without Showing a Promissory Note to the Principal Debtor for the Proper Enforcement
A.V. Gabov,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Head of the Department of Civil Law and Process
of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation
The author analyzes the question about the order of presenting the bill for payment including the courts’ activity in this issue and the judicial practice on the designated subject. Demand for payment filed in the place other than the place specified in the bill as the place of payment cannot be considered as the proper way. Consequently, the protest for non-payment provided without the provision of bills for payment at the place specified in the bill as the place of payment cannot be considered as proper evidence of lack of payment and be grounds for satisfaction of recourse claims followed from the bill. A creditor who is unable to refute the objections of the debtor about the absence of direct presentation of bills for payment is considered delinquent. If the bill had to be brought in one term, but it was not presented, then the creditor shall be entitled to present the bill to the principal debtor during the entire period of limitations (three years from the date of maturity). Wherein he would be required to implement his right as well as he would have carried out within the time specified in the document.
Keywords: bill; judicial practice; the performance of obligations.
References
Gabov A.V. Ocherki po teorii veksel’nogo prava. Chast’ vtoraya. Peredacha vekselya i osuschestvlenie prav po vekselyu [Essays on the Theory of the Bill of Exchange Law. Part Two. Transfer Notes and Exercise of Rights under the Bill of Exchange] (in Russian). M., 2000. P. 82–87.
Urukov V.N. Veksel’: dogovornaya teoriya i praktika [Bill of Exchange: Contract Theory and Practice] (in Russian). M., 2011. P. 232.
Urukov V.N. Voprosy pred’yavleniya vekselya [Presentation’s Questions of the Bill of Еxchange] (in Russian) // Economy and Law. 1999. No. 8. P. 94.
Veksel’noe pravo: Uchebno-metodichesky kurs [Law of Bills of Exchange: Methodological Course] (in Russian) / Ed. by V.V. Yarkov. St. Petersburg, 2006. P. 103–174.
Lapach V.A. Sistema ob’ektov grazhdanskikh prav: Teoriya i sudebnaya praktika [System of Objects of Civil Rights: Theory and Court Practice] (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 2002. P. 442.
Grazhdanskoe ulozhenie Germanii = Deutsches Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch mit Einführunggesetz: Vvod. zakon k Grazhd. ulozheniyu; Per. s nem. [German Civil Code = Deutsches Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch mit Einführunggesetz: Introductory Act to the Civil Code; Transl. from German] (in Russian) / V. Bergmann et al. 3rd ed., rev. M., 2008. P. 317.
Germanskoe pravo. Chast’ 1. Grazhdanskoe ulozhenie / Per. s nem. [German Law. Part 1. Civil Code / Transl. from the German] (in Russian). M., 1996. P. 185. (Modern Foreign and International Private Law.)
Novoselova L.A. Veksel’ v hozyaystvennom oborote: Kommentary praktiki rassmotreniya sporov [Bill of Exchange in Economic Circulation: Commentary to Practice of Disputes] (in Russian). 4th ed., rev. and exp. M., 2003. P. 47.
Dobrynina L.Yu. Veksel’noe pravo Rossii: Uchebnoe i prakticheskoe posobie [Law of Bills of Exchange in Russia: Educational and Practical Guide] (in Russian). M., 1998. P. 125.
Grazhdansky protsess: Uchebnik [Civil Procedure: Textbook] (in Russian) / Ed. by M.K. Treushnikov. 4th ed., rev. and exp. M., 2011. P. 234–235.
Maleshin D.Ya. Grazhdanskaya protsessual’naya sistema Rossii [Russian Civil Procedural System] (in Russian). M., 2011. P. 120.
Information about the author
Gabov A.V. (Moscow) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Head of the Department of Civil Law and Process of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation (117218, Russia, Moscow сity, Bol’shaya Cheremushkinskaya st., 34; e-mail: [email protected]).
A.V. Gabov
Advertisement
Our partners
