We in a citing index:
On the Question about the Features of the Consideration of Individual Complaints in Order of Para. 2 of Art. 333 and Para. 5 of Art. 244.6 of the Civil Rrocedure Code of the Russian Federation
Yu.A. Timofeev,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Assistant Professor of the Department
of Civil Procedure of the Ural State Law Academy
The paper analyzes the procedure for dealing with individual complaints on appeal in a civil proceeding. The author notes that the provisions of para. 2 of art. 333 and of para. 5 of art. 244.6 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation that fixed different procedures for handling individual complaints to the court of first instance, depending on the procedural issue on which the contested decision was made. It does not fully take into account the consequences of that entails legal procedural matter for the applicant. As a result, persons who are in a similar legal situation will defend their rights in the various civil process procedures that violates the principle of equality of rights to judicial protection and creates an element of discrimination of some participants in the proceedings before the others. Provisions possibility of the court of appeal of self-selection procedures for handling privacy complaints does not correspond to the will of the parties involved in the case, that is inconsistent with the principle of optionality. Replacing individual notification of persons involved in the case on the time and place of the hearing by public offering of the information inside the court of appeal, and on his official website created obstacle for the parties to civil proceedings of different social groups, technical limitations, property and territory character on access to this information. This results in unequal access to judicial protection and the inability for some stakeholders to take part in the hearing and implement procedural rights under art. 35 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, which violates their right to judicial protection.
Keywords: appellate; civil process; constitution.
References
Borisova E.A. Apelljacija, kassacija, nadzor po grazhdanskim delam [The appeal, cassation, supervision in civil cases] (in Russian). M., 2013. P. 97.
Shakir’janov R.V. Apelljacionnoe proizvodstvo, shagi po optimizacii grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva: izmenenija v GPK RF [The appeal proceedings, efforts to optimize the civil justice: changes in the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation] (in Russian) // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2010. No. 3. P. 25–29.
Shakir’janov R.V. Problemy rasshirenija polnomochij suda kassacionnoj instancii v stadii podgotovki del k sudebnomu razbiratel’stvu [Problems expand powers of the court cassation instance in the preparation of cases for trial] (in Russian) // Russian Judge. 2009. No. 5.
Alieskerov M.A. Kollegial’noe i edinolichnoe rassmotrenie grazhdanskih del v sudah vtoroj instancii [Collective and individual judiciary in civil matters in courts of second instance] (in Russian) // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2008. No. 9.
Zhujkov V.M. Sudebnaja reforma: problemy dostupa k pravosudiju [Judicial reform: the problem of access to justice] (in Russian). M., 2006.
Timofeev Yu.A. Polnomochija suda vtoroj instancii v grazhdanskom processe: sovremennye problemy [The powers of the court of second instance in civil proceedings: contemporary issues] (in Russian) / Ed. by V.V. Yarkov. M., 2008.
Lesnickaja L.F. Apelljacionnoe proizvodstvo po grazhdanskim delam v sisteme sudov obshhej jurisdikcii [Appeal proceedings in civil cases in the system of courts of general jurisdiction] (in Russian) («ConsultantРlus»). Smagina E.S. O nekotoryh novellah i perspektivah razvitija apelljacionnogo proizvodstva v grazhdanskom processe [Some new developments and prospects of the appeal in a civil proceeding] (in Russian) // Lawyer. 2011. No. 14. P. 35–40.
Borisova E.A. Modernizacija proverochnyh proizvodstv // Apelljacija, kassacija, nadzor: novelli GPK RF i UPK RF. Pervij opit kriticheskogo mishlenija [Modernization of checking proceedings // The appeal, cassation, supervision: novels RF CPC, the CPC. The first experience of critical thinking] (in Russian) / Ed. by N.A. Kolokol’cev. M., 2011. P. 22.
Borisova E.A. Reformirovanie processual’nogo zakonodatel’stva: nastojashhee i budushhee [The reform of procedural law: present and future] (in Russian) // Arbitration and Civil Procedure. 2011. No. 4.
Shakir’janov R.V. Rassmotrenie grazhdanskih del v sude apelljacionnoj instancii v pis’mennom porjadke: izmenenija v GPK [Consideration of civil cases in the court of appeal in writing: changes to the Code of Civil Procedure] (in Russian) («ConsultantPlus»).
Zhujkov V.M. Sudebnaja reforma: dostup k pravosudiju [Judicial reform: access to justice] (in Russian). M., 2006.
Yarkov V.V. Juridicheskie fakty v civilisticheskom processe [Legal facts in the civil process] (in Russian). M., 2012. P. 158.
Shakarjan M.S. Grazhdanskoe processual’noe pravo rossii: Uchebnik [Russian civil procedural law: Textbook] (in Russian). M., P. 397.
Sahnova T.A. Procedurnost’ civilisticheskogo processa: metodologija budushhego [Proceduralness of civil process: methodology of the future] (in Russian) // Herald of Civil Procedure. 2012. No. 1. P. 11.
Information about the author
Timofeev Yu.A. (Ekaterinburg) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Assistant Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Ural State Law Academy (620137, Russian Federation, Ekaterinburg, Komsomolskaya st., 21, room 404, e-mail: [email protected]).
Yu.A. Timofeev
Advertisement
Our partners
