We in a citing index:
ALIMONY CLAIMS ACTUAL CAREGIVERS OF THE CHILD: PROCEDURAL FEATURES COURT PERMISSION
E.G. KOMISSAROVA,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor,
Honored Worker of Higher Education Russian Federation,
Professor, Department of Civil Law, Perm State University,
Tyumen State University
T.V. KRASNOVA,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Department of Civil Law and Procedure, Tyumen State University
https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-3-236-258
This article is devoted to theoretical research problems of interaction and correlation
material-legal and procedural components in the structure of such a phenomenon as
the actual upbringing of a child and the legal consequences that it entails. The “semilegal”
regime of this type of relationship, associated with the legislative non-obviousness
of their subjects, as well as the criteria for the occurrence of legal consequences of such
education, introduces significant features to procedural relations. The authors make one of
the few scientific attempts to investigate these features. The subject of theoretical analysis
involves essential signs of relationships for the actual upbringing of a child and tools
judicial knowledge of this category of cases: logic for the purpose of establishing the content
reliability of the studied post-facts, reception reconstruction of past events in the relations
of the disputing parties; judicial interpretation, judicial discretion, analogy of the law. In
conclusion, the idea is put forward that the problem of proper child-rearing should not be
covered by the problem of evaluative concepts. This problem is more of a methodological
one, and its effective resolution should start not so much from a protective cross-section of
the topic of childhood, where there is room for parental delinquency and the destructive
notion of “inappropriate child-rearing” with its extreme cases of infringement of children’s
rights and interests, but from a positive-regulative aspect.
Keywords: alimony payments obligations; actual caregivers and actual pupils; intra-family
content second priority; proper upbringing.
References
Abushenko D.B. Ob obshchikh podkhodakh k reformirovaniiu protsessual’nogo
zakonodatel’stva skvoz’ prizmu sistemnogo vliianiia material’nogo prava na tsivilisticheskii
protsess i «chastnykh vkraplenii» material’nogo prava v protsessual’nuyu tkan’ [On General
Approaches to Reforming Procedural Legislation through the Prism of the Systemic
Influence of Substantive Law on Civil Procedure and “Partial Inclusions” of Substantive
Law in the Procedural Fabric]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil
Procedure, 2013, no. 5, pp. 21–33. (In Russ.)
Akhmetianova Z.A., Kovalkova E.Iu., Nizamieva O.N. et al.; Nizamieva O.N. (ed.).
Kommentarii k Semeinomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii (postateinyi) [Commentary to
the Family Code of the Russian Federation (Article-by-Article)]. Moscow: Prospekt,
2010. 342 p. (In Russ.)
Boshko V. Alimenty: Istoriko-dogmaticheskii ocherk [Alimony: Historical and Dogmatic
Sketch]. Vestnik sovetskoi iustitsii – Herald of Soviet Justice, 1926, no. 22(80),
pp. 874–877. (In Russ.)
Brandenburgskii Ia.N. Zhizn’ pred”iavliaet svoi trebovaniia [Life Has its Demands].
Ezhenedel’nik sovetskoi iustitsii – Soviet Justice Weekly, 1928, no. 23, pp. 664–667. (In Russ.)
Bratus S.N., Orlovskii P.E. (eds.). Kommentarii k Kodeksu o brake i sem’e RSFSR
[Commentary to the Marriage and Family Code of the RSFSR]. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia
literatura, 1971. 246 p. (In Russ.)
Frantsev A.S. Kriterii razgranicheniia norm material’nogo i protsessual’nogo prava
[Criteria for Differentiating the Norms of Substantive and Procedural Law]. Zakonodatel’stvo
– Legislation, 2019, No. 12, pp. 47–56. (In Russ.)
Grishaev S.P. Postateinyi kommentarii k Semeinomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii
[Article-by-Article Commentary on the Family Code of the Russian Federation]. 2nd ed.
SPS “ConsultantPlus”, 2018. (In Russ.)
Ioffe O.S. Sovetskoe grazhdanskoe pravo. Kurs lektsii: Pravootnosheniia, sviazannye
s produktami tvorcheskoi deiatel’nosti. Semeinoe pravo. Nasledstvennoe parvo [Soviet
Civil Law. Course of Lectures. Legal Relations Relating to the Products of Creative
Activity. Family Law. Law of Succession]. Leningrad: Leningrad University Publishing
House, 1965. 347 p. (In Russ.)
Kapitova O.V. Pravovaia priroda mekhanizma alimentirovaniia v semeinom prave
Rosssiiskoi Federatsii: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [The Legal Nature of the Alimony
Mechanism in the Family Law of the Russian Federation: Synopsis of a Thesis for
a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 2009. 25 p. (In Russ.)
Komissarova E.G. Pravovaia institutsionalizatsiia otnoshenii vospitatelei i vospitannikov
v ХIХ v. [Legal Institutionalization of the Relationship Between Tutors and Inmates
in the 19th Century]. Ex jure – Ex jure, 2020, no. 4, pp. 91–105. (In Russ.)
Komissarova E.G. Problemy fakticheskogo vospitaniia rebenka: metodologicheskii
vzgliad [Problems of the Actual Upbringing of a Child: A Methodological Perspective].
Lex Russica – Lex Russica, 2020, no. 3, pp. 18–32. (In Russ.)
Komissarova E.G., Gorina N.V. Otnosheniia po fakticheskomu vospitaniiu rebenka:
istoriko-pravovoi ekskurs (sovetskii period) [Relationships in the Actual Upbringing of
a Child: A Historical and Legal Perspective (Soviet Period)]. Iuridicheskaia nauka i praktika
– Legal Science and Practice, 2020, vol. 16, iss. 2, pp. 56–66. (In Russ.)
Kostiuchenko E.Iu., Muratova S.A. Osobennosti regulirovaniia instituta alimentnykh
obiazatel’stv drugikh chlenov sem’i (na primere zakonodatel’stva drugikh stran – uchastnikov
SNG) [Peculiarities of Regulation of the Institute of Alimony Obligations of Other
Family Members (on the Example of the Legislation of Other CIS Countries)]. Obrazovanie.
Nauka. Nauchnye kadry – Education. Science. Scientific Personnel, 2015, no. 5,
pp. 82–84. (In Russ.)
Krasheninnikov P.V. (ed.). Postateinyi kommentarii k Semeinomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi
Federatsii i Federal’nomu zakonu «Ob opeke i popechitel’stve» [Article-by-Article
Commentary to the Family Code of the Russian Federation and the Federal Law “On
Guardianship”]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Statut, 2010. 695 p. (In Russ.)
Makovskii et al. A.L. (eds.). Grazhdanskoe ulozhenie Germanii – Deutschen Bürgerliches
Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz: Vvod. zakon k Grazhd. Ulozheniiu [German
Civil Code – Deutschen Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch mit Einführungsgesetz: Introductory
Law to the Civil Code]. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer, 2004. 610 p. (In Russ.)
Nechaeva A.M. (ed.). Kommentarii k Semeinomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Commentary
to the Family Code of the Russian Federation]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Iurait, 2009.
559 p. (In Russ.)
Nechaeva A.M. Semeinoe parvo [Family Law]. Moscow: Iurait, 2010. 285 p. (In Russ.)
Nelson H.L., Nelson J.L. Frail Parents, Robust Duties. Utah Law Review, 1992, vol. 3,
pp. 747–763.
Pergament A.I. Alimentnye obiazatel’stva po sovetskomu pravu: avtoref. dis. … kand.
iurid. nauk [Alimentary Obligations Under the Soviet Law: Synopsis of a Thesis for
a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 1951. 16 p. (In Russ.)
Polianskii P.L. Formirovanie semeinogo prava kak otrasli v Rossii: postanovka problemy
[Formation of Family Law as a Branch in Russia: Problem Statement]. Vestnik
Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 11: Pravo – Herald of Moscow University. Series 11:
Law, 2010, no. 2, pp. 3–33. (In Russ.)
Serebriakova A.A. Metodika issledovaniia teorii i praktiki alimentnykh pravootnoshenii
[Research Methodology of the Theory and Practice of Alimony Legal Relations]. In
Gabov A.V., Golubtsov V.G., Kuznetsova O.A. (eds.). Metodologicheskie problemy tsivilisticheskikh
issledovanii: sbornik nauchnykh statei. Ezhegodnik. Vyp. 3. 2018 [Methodological
Problems of the Civil Law Researches: Collection of Scientific Articles. Annual.
Issue 3. 2018]. Moscow: Statut, 2018, pp. 333–352. (In Russ.)
Tarusina N.N. Ocherki teorii rossiiskogo semeinogo prava [Essays on the Theory of
Russian Family Law]. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State University Publ., 1999. 85 p. (In Russ.)
Tarusina N.N. Sudebnaia praktika po semeinym delam: problemy usmotreniia na grani
pravotvorchestva [Judicial Practice in Family Cases: Problems of Discretion on the
Verge of Lawmaking]. Lex Russica – Lex Russica, 2019, no. 5, pp. 40–48. (In Russ.)
Tumanov A.V. Alimentnye obiazatel’stva suprugov i drugikh chlenov sem’i [Alimony
Obligations of Spouses and Other Family Members]. Obrazovanie i parvo – Education
and Law, 2009, no. 9, pp. 12–16. (In Russ.)
Zakarliuka A.V., Zviagintseva L.M., Kulikova M.A., Malov A.A., Pankratova N.A.,
Reshetnikova I.V., Solomeina E.A., Tsaregorodtsev E.A. Reshetnikova I.V. (ed.). Spravochnik
po dokazyvaniiu v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Handbook of Evidence in
Civil Proceedings]. 6th ed. Moscow: Norma; Infra-M, 2017. 448 p. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
E.G. Komissarova (Perm, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Honored
Worker of Higher Education Russian Federation, Professor, Department of Civil Law,
Perm State University, Tyumen State University (15 Bukireva St., Perm, 614919, Russia;
e-mail: [email protected]).
T.V. Krasnova (Tyumen, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Department of Civil Law and Procedure, Tyumen State University (38 Lenina St.,
Tyumen, 625000, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Komissarova E.G., Krasnova T.V. Alimentnye pritiazaniia fakticheskikh vospitatelei
rebenka: protsessual’nye osobennosti sudebnogo razresheniia [Alimony Claims Actual
Caregivers of the Child: Procedural Features Court Permission]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 236–258. (In Russ.) https://
doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-3-236-258
E.G. KOMISSAROVA, T.V. KRASNOVA
Advertisement
Our partners
