We in a citing index:
THE ISSUES ADJUDICATED DECISIONS ON TERMINATION OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS ON NON-REHABILITATING GROUNDS IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
THE ISSUES ADJUDICATED DECISIONS ON TERMINATION
OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS ON NON-REHABILITATING GROUNDS
IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS
I.Yu. ZAGORUIKO,
Doctor of Economic Sciences, Candidate of Legal Sciences, Professor,
Department of Business Law, Civil and Arbitration Procedure, Faculty of Law,
Perm State University
B.D. EGOROV,
Student, Department of Business Law, Civil and Arbitration Procedure,
Faculty of Law, Perm State University
DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-6-252-264
In this article, the authors analyze the provisions of the Institute of prejudice in civil
proceedings, concerning the issues of prejudice of judicial acts decided in criminal
proceedings, and also highlight some of the problems arising in their application in
judicial practice and possible solutions to such problems. The institution of prejudice in
civil proceedings has undergone significant changes, including in terms of the list of law
enforcement acts, which the legislator has given a pre-judicial value. At the same time, both
in the scientific world and in law enforcement practice, the question remains open as to
how to correctly assess the information contained in the decision to terminate a criminal
case on non-rehabilitating grounds, if such a decision was made not at the judicial stage
of criminal proceedings. This problem, in the opinion of authors is becoming increasingly
important in light of the reform of the procedural legislation to ensure reasonable terms of
consideration of civil disputes, as well as assist people are victims of crime with maximum
support from the state in obtaining evidence of harm as a result of this wrongful act.
Keywords: grounds for exemption from proof; prejudice; factual circumstances of the case
subject to proof; decision to terminate the criminal case on non-rehabilitating grounds.
References
Chelyshev M.Iu., Valeev D.Kh. Aktual’nye problemy grazhdanskogo prava i protsessa:
po materialam mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Actual Problems
of Civil Law and Procedure: Based on the Materials of the International Scientific and
Practical Conference]. Zakon – Law, 2006, no. 12, pp. 116–118. (In Russ.)
Egorov B.D. Voprosy preiuditsial’nosti postanovlenii o prekrashchenii ugolovnogo dela
po nereabilitiruiushchim osnovaniiam v grazhdanskom protsesse [Issues of Prejudice of
Decisions to Terminate a Criminal Case on Non-Rehabilitating Grounds in Civil Proceedings].
In Aktual’nye problemy grazhdanskogo prava i protsessa: vzgliad molodogo
issledovatelia: sbornik materialov Vserossiiskoi studencheskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii,
g. Perm’, 28 noiabria 2019 g. [Actual Problems of Civil Law and Process: The
View of a Young Researcher: Collection of Materials of the All-Russian Student Scientific
and Practical Conference, Perm, 28 November 2019]. Perm: Perm Institute of the
Federal Penitentiary Service of Russia Publ., 2020, pp. 349–354. (In Russ.)
Golubtsov V.G. Primiritel’nye protsedury v sfere ekonomicheskogo pravosudiia: tendentsii
i perspektivy [Conciliation Procedures in the Field of Economic Justice: Trends
and Prospects]. Zakon – Law, 2013, no. 8, pp. 93–99. (In Russ.)
Gurvich M.A. Sudebnoe reshenie: teoreticheskie problemy [Judgment: Theoretical
Problems]. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura, 1976. 176 p. (In Russ.)
Lukianova I.N. Problemy instituta preiuditsii kak instrumenta pravovoi opredelennosti
v sovremennom grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Problems of the Institution of Prejudice
as an Instrument of Legal Certainty in Modern Civil Proceedings]. Zakony Rossii: opyt,
analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice, 2015, no. 12, pp. 28–32.
(In Russ.)
Nakhova E.A. K voprosu o kontseptsii besspornykh obstoiatel’stv v tsivilisticheskom
i administrativnom sudoproizvodstve Rossiiskoi Federatsii [On the Concept of Indisputable
Circumstances in Civil and Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation].
Leningradskii iuridicheskii zhurnal – Leningrad Legal Journal, 2017, no. 1, pp. 216–228.
(In Russ.)
Neznamov A.V. Sud’ba instituta preiuditsii v svete predlagaemoi reformy grazhdanskogo
protsessa [The Fate of the Institution of Prejudice in the Light of the Proposed
Reform of the Civil Procedure]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess – Arbitration and
Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 12, pp. 39–40. (In Russ.)
Poliak M.I. Preiuditsiia v grazhdanskom, arbitrazhnom, ugolovnom, administrativnom
sudoproizvodstve [Prejudice in Civil, Arbitration, Criminal, Administrative Proceedings].
SPS «ConsultantPlus». 2018. (In Russ.)
Valeev D.Kh. Ispolnitel’noe proizvodstvo i protsessual’naia forma [Enforcement Proceedings
and Procedural Form]. Rossiiskii ezhegodnik grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo
protsessa – Russian Yearbook of Civil and Arbitration Procedure, 2003, no. 2, pp. 378–
386. (In Russ.)
Valeev D.Kh. Kommentarii k Federal’nomu zakonu «Ob ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve»:
nauchno-prakticheskii s postateinymi materialami [Commentary on the Federal Law
“On Enforcement Proceedings”: Scientific and Practical with Article-by-Article Materials].
St. Petersburg: Piter, 2003. 541 p. (In Russ.)
Information about the author
I.Yu. Zagoruiko (Perm, Russia) – Doctor of Economic Sciences, Candidate of
Legal Sciences, Professor, Department of Business Law, Civil and Arbitration Procedure,
Faculty of Law, Perm State University (5, Bldg. 3 Genkel St., Perm, 614068, Russia;
e-mail: [email protected]).
B.D. Egorov (Perm, Russia) – Student, Department of Business Law, Civil and Arbitration
Procedure, Faculty of Law, Perm State University (5, Bldg. 3 Genkel St., Perm,
614068, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Zagoruiko I.Yu., Egorov B.D. Voprosy mezhotraslevoi preiuditsii sudebnykh aktov,
postanovlennykh po ugolovnym delam i po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniiakh,
v grazhdanskom protsesse Rossiiskoi Federatsii [The Issues Adjudicated Decisions
on Termination of Criminal Proceedings on Non-Rehabilitating Grounds in Civil Proceedings].
Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10,
no. 6, pp. 252–264. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-6-252-264
I.Yu. ZAGORUIKO, B.D. EGOROV
Advertisement
Our partners
