Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

SOME ISSUES OF THE INSTITUTE OF PROCEDURAL TERMS IN CIVIL AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS

SOME ISSUES OF THE INSTITUTE OF PROCEDURAL TERMS
IN CIVIL AND ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS

N.A. ARTEBYAKINA,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Law,
Ilya Ulyanov State Pedagogical University

DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2019-9-6-97-115

The article identifies isolated practical problematic issues related to the institution of
procedural terms in civil and arbitration proceedings. The author of this article does not aim
to consider the system of procedural terms systematically. The view is focused on individual
issues. The attention is drawn to the fact that the time limits for considering civil cases in the
first instance are determined by the legislator according to a not entirely clear principle. The
time for considering a case in court as a general rule is two months from the day when the
application is submitted to the court, and one month for a justice of the peace. However, the
time period for consideration of a case by the arbitration court was three months, before the
introduction of amendments to the current legislation; now it has been doubled, which does
not seem to be quite logical compared to the time taken when considering cases in courts of
general jurisdiction. In addition, the following problems are identified in the research: the
ratio of the time for consideration of civil cases in the first instance, as well as in appeal and
cassation instances, in courts of general jurisdiction and arbitration courts; the problem of
compliance with legislatively established terms for considering civil cases depending on the
subject of the Russian Federation; the question about the arbitrary interpretation of legislative
principles by judges is raised in relation to procedural terms.

Keywords: procedural limits; institute of procedural limits; civil proceedings; arbitration
proceedings; first instance; Justice of the peace; arbitration courts; courts of general
jurisdiction; correct and timely consideration of cases; reasonable term of proceedings.

References

Artebiakina N.A. O sudebnom normotvorchestve na primere vozmozhnosti podachi
iskovogo zaiavleniia o priznanii prava otsutstvuiushchim [On Judicial Rulemaking as
an Example of the Possibility of Filing a Statement of Claim That the Right Is Absent].
Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi iuridicheskoi akademii – Bulletin of Saratov State
Law Academy, 2019, no. 2(127), pp. 143–148. (In Russ.)
Bogomolov A.A., Isaenkova O.V., Sidorovnin A.A. Svoevremennost’ razresheniia
grazhdanskikh del kak zadacha grazhdanskiogo sudoproizvodstva [Timely Resolution of
Civil Cases as a Task of Civil Proceedings]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess – Arbitration
and Civil Procedure, 2002, no. 6, pp. 14–16. (In Russ.)
Chechetkina T.V. Istoricheskie predposylki poiavleniia poniatiia «razumnyi srok»
v grazhdanskom protsessual’nom prave [Historical Background of the Appearance of
the Concept of “Reasonable Time” in Civil Procedural Law]. Vestnik Cheliabinskogo
gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Pravo – Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University.
Series: Law, 2015, no. 17(372), pp. 137–142. (In Russ.)
Dikarev I.S., Gordeev P.S. Razumnost’ protsessual’nykh srokov – printsip ugolovnogo
sudoproizvodstva [The Reasonableness of the Procedural Deadlines Is the Principle of
Criminal Proceedings]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia 5.
Iurisprudentsiia – Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Jurisprudence, 2012,
no. 1(16), pp. 115–118. (In Russ.)
Egorova T.V. Problemy sobliudeniia protsessual’nykh srokov v arbitrazhnom protsesse
[Compliance with Procedural Deadlines in Arbitration Procedure]. Vestnik Tambovskogo
universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye nauki – Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities,
2009, no. 6(74), pp. 405–410. (In Russ.)
Gushchin V.Z. Protsessual’nye sroki grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva nuzhdaiutsia
v sovershenstvovanii [Procedural Timelines for Civil Litigation Need Improvement].
Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice,
2007, no. 12, pp. 52–54. (In Russ.)
Interv’iu s Predsedatelem Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii Valeriem Dmitrievichem
Zor’kinym [Interview with the Chairman of the Constitutional Court of the
Russian Federation Valery Dmitrievich Zorkin]. Iurist – Lawyer, 2018, no. 12, pp. 4–18.
(In Russ.)
Laskina N.V. Protsessual’nye garantii pri rassmotrenii del o kompensatsii za narushenie
prava na grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo v razumnyi srok [Procedural Safeguards in
Cases of Compensation for Violation of the Right to Civil Proceedings Within a Reasonable
Time]. Sovremennoe parvo – Current Law, 2011, no. 10, pp. 116–119. (In Russ.)
Lenin V.I. Polnoe sobranie sochinenii. T. 45 [Full Composition of Writings. Vol. 45].
5th ed., Moscow: Politizdat, 1970. 729 p. (In Russ.)
Matuzov N.I., Malko A.V. (eds.). Teoriia gosudarstva i prava: kurs lektsii [Theory of
State and Law: Lecture Course]. 2nd ed., Moscow: Iurist”, 2002. 776 p. (In Russ.)
Mirzoian M.E. Voprosy protsessual’nykh srokov po novomu grazhdanskomu
protsessual’nomu zakonodatel’stvu [Issues on Procedural Terms Under the New Civil
Procedural Law]. Lex Russica, 2004, no. 1, pp. 256–261. (In Russ.)
Nigmatdinov R.M. K voprosu o sudebnom normotvorchestve [On Judicial Rule-Making],
in: Tumanov S.N. (ed.). Pravo i ego realizatsiia v XXI veke: Sbornik nauchnykh
trudov (po materialam Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, posviashchennoi
80-letiiu Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi iuridicheskoi akademii, Saratov, 29–30 sentiabria
2011 g.). V 2 ch. Ch. 1 [Law and its Implementation in the 20th Century: A Collection
of Scientific Papers (Based on Materials from the International Scientific and
Practical Conference Dedicated to the 80th Anniversary of Saratov State Law Academy,
Saratov, 29–30 September 2011). In 2 parts. Part 1]. Saratov: Publishing House of Saratov
State Law Academy, 2011, p. 321. (In Russ.)
Osokina G.L. Grazhdanskii protsess. Obshchaia chast’ [Civil Procedure. A General
Part]. 2nd ed., Moscow: Norma, 2008. 752 p. (In Russ.)
Pankratov V.A., Mironova M.V. Protsessual’nye sroki po Grazhdanskomu
protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii i Arbitrazhnomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu
Rossiiskoi Federatsii: sravnitel’nyi analiz [Procedural Timelines for the Civil Procedure
Code of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation:
A Comparative Analysis]. Vestnik Brianskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta –
Bryansk State University Herald, 2010, no. 2, pp. 114–120. (In Russ.)
Raspopova E.M. O prirode protsessual’nykh srokov [On the Nature of the Procedural
Deadlines]. Vestnik Belgorodskogo universiteta potrebitel’skoi kooperatsii – Herald of
Belgorod University of Cooperation, Economics and Law, 2006, no. 4(20), pp. 427–430.
(In Russ.)
Rybkina K.V. Ischislenie i vosstanovlenie protsessual’nykh srokov v grazhdanskom
i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Calculation and Restoration of Procedural Terms in Civil and
Arbitration Procedure]. Sotsial’no-ekonomicheskie nauki i gumanitarnye issledovaniia –
Social and Economic Sciences and Humanities, 2016, no. 14, pp. 134–141. (In Russ.)
Sokolinskaia Iu.M. Priostanovlenie proizvodstva po grazhdanskomu delu: problemy
razumnosti protsessual’nykh srokov [Suspension of Civil Proceedings: Problems of Reasonableness
of Procedural Timelines]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.
Seriia: Pravo – Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Law, 2013, no. 2(15),
pp. 184–192. (In Russ.)
Solovieva N.A., Shinkaruk V.M. Vzaimosviaz’ protsessual’noi istiny i razumnykh srokov
ee ustanovleniia [The Relationship of Procedural Truth and the Reasonable Timing of
its Establishment]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia 5. Iurisprudentsiia
– Science Journal of Volgograd State University. Jurisprudence, 2014, no. 4(25),
pp. 159–164. (In Russ.)
Solovykh S.Zh. Zakonnost’ sudeiskogo usmotreniia [The Legality of Judicial Discretion],
in: Tumanov S.N. (ed.). Pravo i ego realizatsiia v XXI veke: Sbornik nauchnykh
trudov (po materialam Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii, posviashchennoi
80-letiiu Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi iuridicheskoi akademii, Saratov, 29–30 sentiabria
2011 g.). V 2 ch. Ch. 1 [Law and its Implementation in the 20th Century: A Collection
of Scientific Papers (Based on Materials from the International Scientific and
Practical Conference Dedicated to the 80th Anniversary of Saratov State Law Academy,
Saratov, 29–30 September 2011). In 2 parts. Part 1]. Saratov: Publishing House of Saratov
State Law Academy, 2011, pp. 333–334. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

N.A. Artebyakina (Ulyanovsk, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate
Professor of the Department of Law, Ilya Ulyanov State Pedagogical University (4/5
Lenin Sq., Ulyanovsk, 432071, Russia; e-mail: bna_81@mail.ru).

Recommended citation

Artebyakina N.A. Otdel’nye problemy, sviazannye s institutom protsessual’nykh srokov
v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom sudoproizvodstve [Some Issues of the Institute of Procedural
Terms in Civil and Arbitration Proceedings]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa
– Herald of Civil Procedure, 2019, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 97–115. (In Russ.) https://doi.
org/10.24031/2226-0781-2019-9-6-97-115

el_.png   it_.png   book.png

N.A. ARTEBYAKINA