We in a citing index:
TARGET INDICATORS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF JUSTICE
FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF JUSTICE
Candidate of Legal Sciences,
General Director of the Legal Center “Alekseevskaya and Partners”
The article proposes a method for measuring sustainable development as a means of the
implementation of the Global Goal 16 of the United Nations Agenda. This method is the
primary attempt to quantify the quality of the rules of the judiciary and access to court as
a way to monitor sustainable development in the area of justice. In the recent years, the UN
drew attention to the fact that qualitative changes should be evaluated through quantitative
indicators. The author’s methodology is based on the fair trial standard formulated by the
European Court of Human Rights based on the interpretation of Article 6 of the Convention
for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, as well as the public services
standard of the Russian Federation. In relation to the previously set global goals, development
indices have been developed, but they do not apply to justice. However, it is necessary to
measure what we value, because data is an integral part of sustainable development policies.
The author proposes a technique for measuring qualitative changes in a quantitative way.
This indexing method helps to assess the current level of legal guarantees in the rules of
legal proceedings and draft legislations, and to establish their compliance with the fair trial
principles. Indexing the access to justice has another positive effect – it helps to monitor the
local situations and every level of the judicial system. Putting this method to practice will
encourage avoidance of the adoption of bills that might reduce the level of legal guarantees
and will assist attempts to monitor its dynamics. It might promote introduction of effective
procedures and better access to court, ensure the better accountability of all public justice
institutions at all levels and support overall societal wellbeing.
Keywords: sustainable development; rule of law; fair trial; quantitative measurement;
statistics; access to court; quantitative measuring of the quality.
Alekseevskaya E.I. Fenomen sudebnoj sistemy Rossii [The Phenomenon of the Judicial
System of Russia]. Vestnik arbitrazhnoj praktiki = Herald of Arbitration Practice, 2018, no. 4.
Alekseevskaya E.I. Monitoring verkhovenstva prava i dostupa v sud: 25 let sudebnoj
reforme [Monitoring the Rule of Law and Access to Court: 25 Years of Judicial Reform].
Moscow, 2017. (In Russian)
Alekseevskaya E.I. Pravo znat’ ili sboj sistemy kontrolya [The Right to Know or Failure
of the Control System]. Vestnik arbitrazhnoj praktiki = Herald of Arbitration Practice,
2018, no. 3. (In Russian)
Christofilopoulos E., Mantzanakis S. China 2025: Research & Innovation Landscape.
Foresight and STI Governance, 2016, vol. 10(3).
Dasgupta P., Heal G. The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resource. Review of Economic
Studies, 1974, vol. 41(5).
Di Bella E., Corsi M., Leporatti L., Cavalletti B. Wellbeing and Sustainable Development:
A Multi-Indicator Approach. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia,
2016, vol. 8.
Fourlas G.N. No Future Without Transition: A Critique of Liberal Peace. International
Journal of Transitional Justice, 2015, vol. 9(1).
Hartwick J.M. Intergenerational Equity and Investing of Rents from Exhaustible
Resources. American Economic Review, 1977, vol. 67(5).
Havas A. STI Policies, National Innovation System and Framework Conditions: Their
Impacts on Innovation Performance in Hungary. “Foresight and STI Policy” Higher
School of Economics International Scientific Conference, 2016.
Khabrieva T.Ya., Marku Zh. (eds.). Аdministrativnye protsedury i kontrol’ v svete
evropejskogo opyta [Administrative Procedures and Controls in the Light of European
Experience]. Moscow, 2011. (In Russian)
Kleandrov M.I. Ob obretenii sudebnoj vlast’yu Rossijskoj Federatsii finansovoj nezavisimosti
[On the Attainment by the Judicial Authority of the Russian Federation of
Financial Independence]. SPS «ConsultantPlus». (In Russian)
Russell S.L., Thomson I. Analysing the Role of Sustainable Development Indicators
in Accounting For and Constructing a Sustainable Scotland. Accounting Forum,
2009, vol. 33(3).
Shaker R.R., Sirodoev I.G. Assessing Sustainable Development Across Moldova
Using Household and Property Composition Indicators. Habitat International, 2016,
Vinck P., Pham P. Ownership and Participation in Transitional Justice Mechanisms:
A Sustainable Human Development Perspective from Eastern DRC. International Journal
of Transitional Justice, 2008, vol. 2(3).
Walton M. Capitalism, the State and the Underlying Drives of Human Development.
Human Development Research Paper 9. New York: United Nations Development Programme,
Human Development Report Office, 2010.
Zhang W. Meritocracy versus Democracy. International Herald Tribune, 09.11.2012.
Information about the author
Alekseevskaya E.I. (Moscow, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, General Director
of the Legal Center “Alekseevskaya and Partners” (109074, Moscow, Slavyanskaya
Sq., 4, p. 2, room 403; e-mail: email@example.com).
Alekseevskaya E.I. Tselevye pokazateli ustojchivogo razvitiya pravosudiya [Target
Indicators for Sustainable Development of Justice]. Вестник гражданского процесса =
Herald of Civil Procedure, 2018, no. 5, p. 50–66. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-