We in a citing index:
Absolute Mess, or Is It Allowable to Put Copying of Full Text of the Objection as the Court Decision?
A.R. SULTANOV,
Head of the Legal Department of the PJSC «Nizhnekamskneftekhim»,
Member of the Association for the Advancement of Life and Education
The article gives a look on the problem of Russian procedure of making decisions by courts, i.e. full copying of the position of one party in a court decision, often transferring all errors, typos, turns, and ignoring the position of the other party. The author looks on an example of dispute with tax body. According to the author, this is a gross violation of the fundamental provisions on fair trial, undermines the credibility of the court, as in fact there is violation of principles of legal proceedings as: the principle of immediacy, equality before the law, competition, equality of parties and others. The author analyses positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the European Court of Human Rights on this issue, where the right to judicial protection is interpreted not only as a right to appeal to a court, but also the right to be heard by a court. According to position of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, there is one of the unconditional grounds for repealing a judicial act in criminal proceedings: it is the reproduction of the indictment without taking into account the results of the conducted trial. According to the author, this approach should be realized in all other kinds of proceedings, too. Therefore, the author comes to the conclusion that it is necessary to check judicial acts, which are a copy of only the legal position of one party, without taking into account the results of the trial.
Keywords: court decision; party; copying; legal position; cancellation; checking of court decision; appeal; right to judicial protection.
References
Afanas’ev S.F. K probleme realizatsii prava byt’ vyslushannym v sude pri rassmotrenii grazhdanskih del [To the Problem of the Realization of the Right to Be Heard in Court When Considering Civil Cases]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2012, no. 4. (In Russian)
Afanas’ev S.F. K probleme sushchestvennykh protsessual’nykh oshibok ili bezuslovnykh osnovanij k otmene sudebnykh reshenij po grazhdanskim delam [To the Problem of Substantive Procedural Errors or Unconditional Grounds for Cancellation of Judgments in Civil Cases]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2015, no. 3. (In Russian)
Afanas’ev S.F. Pravo na poluchenie motivirovannogo sudebnogo resheniya po grazhdanskomu delu (mezhdunarodnyj i natsional’nyj aspekty) [The Right to Receive a Reasoned Judicial Decision in a Civil Case (International and National Aspects)]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2008, no. 12. (In Russian)
Bentham J. A Protest against Law Taxes (http://www.laits.utexas.edu/poltheory/ bentham/lawtaxes/index.html). Engel’man I.E. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Textbook of Russian Civil Justice]. Yur’ev, 1904. (In Russian)
Grazhdanskoe protsessual’noe ulozhenie Avstrii [The Austrian Civil Procedure Code]. In Borisova E.A. (ed.). Proverka sudebnykh postanovlenij v grazhdanskom protsesse: rossijskij i zarubezhnyj opyt: Uchebnoe posobie [Check of Judicial Decisions in Civil Procedure: Russian and Foreign Experience: Textbook]. Moscow, 2018. (In Russian)
Hisamov A.H., Shakir’yanov R.V. Sokrashchyonnoe reshenie suda. Voprosy motivirovaniya i preyuditsii [The Reduced Court Decision. Issues of Motivation and Prejudice]. Rossijskaya yustistiya = Russian Justice, 2014, no. 4. (In Russian)
Kazarin I.V. Ignorirovanie sudom dovodov storony = narushenie zadach i printsipov arb. sudoproizvodstva = osnovanie dlya otmeny nemotivirovannogo dolzhnym obrazom sudebnogo akta? [Ignoring by the Court Arguments of the Party = Violation of the Tasks and Principles of Arbitration Legal Proceedings = The Basis for the Cancellation of an Unjustified Judicial Act?] (https://zakon.ru/discussion/2013/10/27/ignorirovanie_sudom_dovodov_ storony__narushenie_zadach_i_principov_arb_sudoproizvodstva__osnovanie_d). (In Russian)
Kudryavtseva E.V., Prokudina L.A. Kak napisat’ sudebnoe reshenie [How to Write a Court Decision]. Moscow, 2012. (In Russian) Polyakov Yu.N. K voprosu o nezavisimosti suda [To the Issue of the Independence of the Court]. Gosudarstvo i pravo = State and Law, 2000, no. 10. (In Russian)
Rabtsevich O.I. Pravo na spravedlivoe sudebnoe razbiratel’stvo: mezhdunarodnoe i vnutrigosudarstvennoe pravovoe regulirovanie [The Right to a Fair Trial: International and Domestic Legal Regulation]. Moscow, 2005. (In Russian)
Ratushnaya B.P. Problemy motivirovannosti sudebnykh reshenij v Ukraine [The Problems of Motivation of Judgments in Ukraine]. Pravo i politika = Law and Policy, 2013, no. 6. (In Russian)
Rozhkova M.A., Glazkova M.E., Savina M.A.; Rozhkova M.A. (ed.). Aktual’nye problemy unifikatsii grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessual’nogo zakonodatel’stva: Monografiya [Actual Problems of the Unification of the Civil Procedural and Arbitration Procedural Legislation: Monograph]. Moscow, 2015. (In Russian)
Vasyaev A.A., Knyaz’kin S.A Motivirovannost’ sudebnykh reshenij – standart Evropejskogo suda po pravam cheloveka [Motivation of Judgments – the Standard of the European Court of Human Rights]. Advokat = Lawyer, 2013, no. 6. (In Russian)
Zagajnova S.K. Sudebnye akty v mehanizme realizatsii sudebnoj vlasti v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Judicial Acts in the Mechanism of Realization of the Judicial Power in Civil and Arbitration Process]. Moscow, 2007. (In Russian)
Zajtsev I.M. Reshenie suda kak protsessual’nyj document [Court Decision as a Procedural Document]. Vestnik SGAP = Herald of the Saratov State Academy of Law, 1995, no. 2. (In Russian)
Information about the author
Sultanov A.R. (Nizhnekamsk, Russia) – Head of the Legal Department of the PJSC «Nizhnekamskneftekhim», Member of the Association for the Advancement of Life and Education (423574, Republic of Tatarstan, Nizhnekamsk, PJSC «Nizhnekamskneftekhim »; e-mail: [email protected]).
Recommended citation
Sultanov A.R. Bezuslovnoe bezobrazie, ili yavlyaetsya li polnoe kopirovanie teksta vozrazhenij dopustimym v kachestve sudebnogo resheniya? [Absolute Mess, or Is It Allowable to Put Copying of Full Text of the Objection as the Court Decision?]. Вестник гражданского процесса = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 5, p. 264–282. (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2017-7-5-264-282
A.R. Sultanov
Advertisement
Our partners
