Herald of Civil Procedure

We in a citing index:




Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Department of Civil Law and Procedure,
Vladimir State University

DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-4-167-177

Mediation procedures in the world legal practice have become one of the most relevant
means of preventing and resolving legal conflicts, and have been positively received by
Russian lawyers. The advantages and at the same time the relevance of the mediation
institution are determined by the existence of an objective possibility to develop solutions
and methods for excluding the conflict for its parties. This article examines the role of
mediation in the civil process system. It is indicated that mediation for a very short period
of its existence in the Russian legal system has acquired the status of a social institution
of modern society. The author has identified the legal basis for mediation and settlement
of legal disputes within the framework of the current legislation. The positive effect of the
development of alternative ways of resolving legal conflicts, in particular, the normative
consolidation of the institution of judicial conciliators, has been established. Analysis of the
main problems of using the Institute of mediation and mediation in resolving disputes and
conflicts at the present stage has shown that it is advisable to make fundamental changes
in the social organization of society, systematic work of state, municipal and public bodies
aimed at promoting legal literacy and reducing the level of aggression in the country. The
study of social, legal and philosophical aspects of this problem has led to the conclusion that
close interaction of jurisprudence, religion, cultural studies, and sociology is necessary, and
the state should act as a unifier of all these areas, since mediation and other alternative
dispute resolution methods are possible only in a socially healthy system.

Keywords: mediation; judicial reconciliation; conflict; resolution; mediation agreement.


Balakin Iu.N. Vostrebovannost’ primiritel’nykh protsedur: vzgliad professional’nykh
predstavitelei [Demand for Conciliation Procedures: The View of Professional Representatives].
Treteiskii sud – Arbitration Court, 2019, no. 1/2, pp. 271–277. (In Russ.)
Bekiasheva D.I. Primiritel’noe razbiratel’stvo na stadii podgotovki dela – budushchee
grazhdanskogo protsessa [Conciliation Proceedings at the Stage of Preparation of the
Case Is the Future of Civil Procedure]. Mirovoi sud’ia – Magistrate Judge, 2012, no. 6,
pp. 2–8. (In Russ.)
Bespalov Iu.F. (ed.). Primiritel’nye protsedury v grazhdanskom, ugolovnom i administrativnom
sudoproizvodstve Rossiiskoi Federatsii: nauchno-prakticheskoe posobie [Conciliation
Procedures in Civil, Criminal and Administrative Proceedings of the Russian Federation:
Scientific and Practical Guide]. Moscow: Prospekt, 2018. 128 p. (In Russ.)
Eliseeva T.S. Protsessual’nye aspekty mediatsii: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Procedural
Aspects of Mediation: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences].
Moscow, 2017. 28 p. (In Russ.)
Galiullin E.R. Praktika primeneniia primiritel’nykh protsedur v arbitrazhnom protsesse
[The Practice of Using Conciliation Procedures in Arbitration Procedure]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 1, pp. 261–267. (In Russ.)
Gavritskii A.V., Kobleva M.M. Vozmozhnost’ mediatsii v ugolovnom protsesse [Possibility
of Mediation in Criminal Procedure]. Mirovoi sud’ia – Magistrate Judge, 2019,
no. 7, pp. 26–29. (In Russ.)
Gerasimova S.I. O poniatii primiritel’noi protsedury [On the Concept of Conciliation].
Mirovoi sud’ia – Magistrate Judge, 2019, no. 3, pp. 32–40. (In Russ.)
Gerasimova S.I. Vidy sudebnykh primiritel’nykh protsedur [Types of Judicial Conciliation
Procedures]. Rossiiskii sud’ia – Russian Judge, 2019, no. 8, pp. 30–35. (In Russ.)
Gridchina N.E. Aktual’nye voprosy zakliucheniia mirovogo soglasheniia v grazhdanskom
i arbitrazhnom protsesse Rossii [Topical Issues of Concluding an Amicable Agreement
in Civil and Arbitration Procedure in Russia]. Evraziiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal –
Eurasian Law Journal, 2017, no. 5, pp. 252–256. (In Russ.)
Khokhlov V.A. Pravovaia kvalifikatsiia otnoshenii mediatsii [Legal Qualification of
Mediation Relations]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience,
Analysis, Practice, 2011, no. 5, pp. 84–90. (In Russ.)
Osutin S.V., Putilovskii A.A. Primenenie mediatsii v imushchestvennykh sporakh [The
Use of Mediation in Property Disputes]. Imushchestvennye otnosheniia v Rossiiskoi Federatsii
– Property Relations in the Russian Federation, 2019, no. 8, pp. 76–79. (In Russ.)
Petukhov N.A., Motorina I.S. Tolkovanie poniatiia «sudebnaia mediatsiia» [Interpretation
of the Concept of “Judicial Mediation”]. Sud’ia – Judge, 2019, no. 9, pp. 26–32.
(In Russ.)
Reshetnikova I.V. Razmyshliaia o sudoproizvodstve: Izbrannoe [Thinking About Litigation:
Selected Works]. Moscow: Statut, 2019. 510 p. (In Russ.)
Sergo A. Mediatsiia v sporakh ob intellektual’noi sobstvennosti [Mediation in Disputes
on Intellectual Property]. Intellektual’naia sobstvennost’. Avtorskoe pravo i smezhnye
prava – Intellectual Property. Copyright, Recourse and Related Rights, 2017, no. 1,
pp. 17–25. (In Russ.)
Shamlikashvili C.A. Al’ternativnye sposoby razresheniia sporov i mediatsii v sovremennom
rossiiskom zakonodatel’stve [Alternative Methods of Dispute Resolution and
Mediation Mediation in Modern Russian Legislation]. Sovremennoe parvo – Modern
Law, 2015, no. 5, pp. 88–93. (In Russ.)
Shestakova M. Verkhovnyi Sud vzialsia za primiritel’nye protsedury: poiaviatsia sudebnye
primiriteli i mediatsiia po administrativnym delam [The Supreme Court Took up
Conciliation Procedures: Judicial Conciliators and Mediation in Administrative Cases
Will Appear]. ezh-Iurist – ej-Lawyer, 2018, no. 5. (In Russ.)
Shilovskaia A.L. Povyshenie effektivnosti grazhdanskogo i ugolovnogo protsessa
s pomoshch’iu mediatsii [Increasing the Efficiency of Civil and Criminal Procedure
Through Mediation]. Iuridicheskii mir – Legal World, 2013, no. 10, pp. 47–50. (In Russ.)
Shvanderova A.R. Institut mediatsii v sovremennoi Rossii kak pravovoi mekhanizm
vzaimodeistviia gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva [Institute of Mediation in
Modern Russia as a Legal Mechanism of Interaction Between the State and Civil Society].
Probely v rossiiskom zakonodatel’stve – Gaps in Russian Legislation, 2017, no. 3,
pp. 140–143. (In Russ.)
Sikri A.K. Mediatsiia [Mediation]. Mediatsiia i parvo – Mediation and Law, 2015,
no. 3, pp. 17–26. (In Russ.)
Voronov A.F. O sovershenstvovanii primiritel’nykh protsedur [On Improving Conciliation
Procedures]. Pravo v vooruzhennykh silakh – Law in the Armed Forces, 2019,
no. 10, pp. 47–54. (In Russ.)
Zagainova S.K. Sovremennye problemy i perspektivy razvitiia prakticheskoi mediatsii
v Rossii [Modern Problems and Prospects for the Development of Practical Mediation
in Russia]. In Razvitie mediatsii v Rossii: teoriia, praktika, obrazovanie [Development
of Mediation in Russia: Theory, Practice, Education]. Moscow: Infotropic Media,
2012, рр. 14–24. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

T.V. Kivlenok (Vladimir, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Department of Civil Law and Procedure, Vladimir State University (87 Gorky St.,
Vladimir, 600000, Russia; e-mail: ta-bagi@mail.ru).

Recommended citation

Kivlenok T.V. Rol’ mediatsii v uregulirovanii pravovykh konfliktov [The Role of
Mediation in the Resolution of Legal Conflicts]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa –
Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 167–177. (In Russ.) https://doi.

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png