Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

STUDY OF THE PROCEDURAL FORM OF SIMPLIFIED PROCEEDINGS IN THE CONTEXT OF THE PROBLEM OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF PROCEDURAL ECONOMY

THE FUTURE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE


R.R. DOLOTIN

R.R. DOLOTIN,
Postgraduate Student, TISBI University of Management

https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-3-212-223

The search for an optimal balance between the result of legal proceedings and the way
to achieve it is currently one of the most important areas of development of procedural
legislation. In this regard, there is a need to use not only the general procedure for the
consideration and resolution of cases, but also a special one, which contributes to the
rational simplification and acceleration of procedures. In this sense, the study of the
procedural form used in the claim and simplified proceedings is of particular value. The
author comes to the conclusion that in simplified proceedings, a truncated procedural form
is used, which is characterized by such manifestations of procedural economy as the absence
of a preliminary meeting, summoning the parties to a court session, the prohibition of the
court’s examination of evidence provided in violation of deadlines, making a decision
without a reasoned part, etc. It is noted that the effectiveness of arbitration proceedings
should not be achieved by violating the fundamental principles of civil proceedings. In
conclusion, the author concludes that the procedural form should be defined as a system of
scientifically grounded, normatively defined conditions of effective and correct resolution
of civil cases, determined by legal relations to be protected.

Keywords: claim proceedings; simplified proceedings; general procedural form; truncated
procedural form; procedural economy.

References

Apokin D.V. Prepiatstviia v realizatsii tselei grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo sudoproizvodstva
[Obstacles in the Realization of the Goals of Civil and Arbitration Proceedings].
Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi iuridicheskoi akademii – Herald of the Saratov
State Law Academy, 2016, no. 1(108), pp. 135–140. (In Russ.)
Boldyreva N.N. Printsip dostupnosti pravosudiia v teorii i praktike grazhdanskogo
i arbitrazhnogo protsessa [The Principle of Accessibility of Justice in the Theory and
Practice of Civil and Arbitration Proceedings]. Arhivarius – Archivist, 2016, no. 4(8),
pp. 109–112. (In Russ.)
Chechina N.A., Chechot D.M. Grazhdanskaia protsessual’naia forma, protsessual’nye
normy i proizvodstva [Civil Procedural Form, Procedural Rules and Proceedings]. In
Nedbailo P.E., Gorshenev V.M. (eds.). Iuridicheskaia protsessual’naia forma. Teoriia
i praktika [Legal Procedural Form. Theory and Practice]. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura,
1976, pp. 173–206. (In Russ.)
Dobrovolskaia T.N., Elkind P.S. Ugolovno-protsessual’naia forma, protsessual’nye
normy i proizvodstvo [Criminal Procedural Form, Procedural Rules and Proceedings].
In Gorshenev V.M., Nedbailo P.E. (eds.). Iuridicheskaia protsessual’naia forma. Teoriia
i praktika: kollektivnaia monografiia [Legal Procedural Form. Theory and Practice: Collective
Monograph]. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura, 1976, pp. 233–275. (In Russ.)
Drebezgov D.A., Pereverzev A.V. Forma itogovogo sudebnogo akta v uproshchennom
sudoproizvodstve: problemy pravoprimeneniia [The Form of the Final Judicial Act in the
Simplified Proceedings: Problems of Law Enforcement]. Vestnik BelJuI MVD Rossii –
Herald of the Belgorod Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2018,
no. 3, pp. 55–61. (In Russ.)
Dudnikova G.V. Arbitrazhnaia protsessual’naia forma: dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Arbitration
Procedural Form: Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Saratov, 2005.
202 p. (In Russ.)
Galkovskaia N.G. Rezul’taty reformy uproshchennogo proizvodstva v arbitrazhnom
protsesse [Results of the Reform of Simplified Proceedings in Arbitration Proceedings].
Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Tomsk State University Journal, 2014,
no. 382, pp. 144–150. (In Russ.)
Gorshenev V.M. (ed.). Teoriia iuridicheskogo protsessa: kollektivnaia monografiia
[The Theory of Legal Process: Collective Monograph]. Kharkov: Vysshaia shkola, 1985.
192 p. (In Russ.)
Gorshenev V.M. Sposoby i organizatsionnye formy pravovogo regulirovaniia v sotsialisticheskom
obshchestve [Methods and Organizational Forms of Legal Regulation in
Socialist Society]. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura, 1972. 258 p. (In Russ.)
Iakovleva A.P. Sootnoshenie printsipov sostiazatel’nosti i dispozitivnosti v sovremennom
sudoproizvodstve [Correlation of Adversarial and Dispositive Principles in Modern
Judicial Proceedings]. Vestnik Povolzhskogo instituta upravleniia – Herald of the Volga
Institute of Management, 2017, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 53–59. (In Russ.)
Kliver E.P. Tsel’ i zadachi ekonomicheskogo pravosudiia: teoreticheskie i prakticheskie
aspekty (po materialam sudebno-arbitrazhnoi praktiki) [The Aim and Tasks of Economic
Justice: Theoretical and Practical Aspects (on Materials of Judicial and Arbitration
Practice)]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriia “Pravo” – Herald of Omsk University.
Series “Law”, 2017, no. 4(53), pp. 115–122. (In Russ.)
Koshcheeva E.S. Uproshchennoe proizvodstvo v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom
protsesse [Simplified Proceedings in Civil and Arbitration Proceedings]. Austrian Journal
of Humanities and Social Sciences, 2017, no. 1-2, pp. 242–249. (In Russ.)
Kotelnikova E.A. Aktual’nye problemy prakticheskogo vnedreniia protsedury uproshchennogo
proizvodstva v grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo [Current Problems of Practical
Implementation of the Simplified Procedure in Civil Proceedings]. Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniia
– Herald of Science and Education, 2018, vol. 1, no. 8(44), pp. 57–60. (In Russ.)
Kulik T.Iu. Osobennosti priniatiia i obzhalovaniia reshenii, prinimaemykh v poriadke
uproshchennogo proizvodstva arbitrazhnymi sudami [Peculiarities of Making
and Appealing Against the Decisions Taken in Summary Proceedings by Arbitration
Courts]. Severo-Kavkazskii iuridicheskii vestnik – North Caucasus Legal Herald, 2017,
no. 2, pp. 133–137. (In Russ.)
Ponomarenko V.A. Motivirovannost’ sudebnogo resheniia v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom
protsesse: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Motivation of a Judgment in Civil
and Arbitration Proceedings: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences].
Moscow, 2007. 24 p. (In Russ.)
Semikina S.A., Kazakova S.P. Otmena motivirovochnoi chasti sudebnogo resheniia
arbitrazhnogo suda: osnovnye problemy [Cancellation of the Motivation Part of the Ruling
of the Arbitration Court: The Main Problems]. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi
iuridicheskoi akademii – Herald of the Saratov State Law Academy, 2018, no. 3(122),
pp. 129–135. (In Russ.)
Shadlovskaia O.D. Uproshchennye sudebnye proizvodstva: poniatie i sushchnost’ [Simplified
Court Proceedings: Concept and Essence]. Problemy ekonomiki i iuridicheskoi praktiki
– Problems of Economics and Legal Practice, 2014, no. 5, pp. 135–138. (In Russ.)
Shakarian M.S. (ed.). Sovetskii grazhdanskii protsess: uchebnik [Soviet Civil Procedure:
Textbook]. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura, 1985. 528 p. (In Russ.)
Shirvis Iu.V. Sredstva optimizatsii arbitrazhnogo sudoproizvodstva [Means to Optimize
Arbitration Proceedings]. In Uletova G.D. (ed.). Sovremennaia doktrina grazhdanskogo,
arbitrazhnogo protsessa i ispolnitel’nogo proizvodstva: teoriia i praktika: sbornik
nauchnekh statei [Modern Doctrine of Civil, Arbitration Procedure and Enforcement
Proceedings: Theory and Practice: Collection of Scientific Articles]. St. Petersburg:
Iuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2004, pp. 536–544. (In Russ.)
Smetannikov A.E. Pravovye aspekty uskoreniia arbitrazhnogo sudoproizvodstva
[Legal Aspects of Acceleration of Arbitration Proceedings]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava
– Journal of Russian Law, 2003, no. 6, pp. 54–57. (In Russ.)
Strogovich M.S. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa: v 2 t. T. 1 [Course of Soviet
Criminal Procedure. In 2 vols. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Nauka, 1968. 470 p. (In Russ.)
Trezubov E.S. «Protsessual’naia revoliutsiia». Obzor izmenenii v tsivilisticheskie
protsessual’nye kodeksy [“Procedural Revolution”. Review of Changes in Civil Procedural
Codes]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia: Gumanitarnye
i obshchestvennye nauki – Herald of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities
and Social Sciences, 2019, no. 2(10), pp. 187–198. (In Russ.)
Zhenetel S.Z., Chuchunova N.A. Nekotorye problemy uproshchennogo proizvodstva
[Some Problems of Simplified Proceedings]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess –
Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2005, no. 12, pp. 9–13. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

R.R. Dolotin (Kazan, Russia) – Postgraduate Student, TISBI University of Management
(13 Mushtari St., Kazan, 420012, Russia; e-mail: renatrd@yandex.ru).

Recommended citation

Dolotin R.R. Issledovanie protsessual’noi formy uproshchennogo sudoproizvodstva
v kontekste problemy realizatsii printsipa protsessual’noi ekonomii [Study of the Procedural
Form of Simplified Proceedings in the Context of the Problem of Implementation of
the Principle of Procedural Economy]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil
Procedure, 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 212–223. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-
0781-2021-11-3-212-223

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

Keywords