Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

…AND JUSTICE FOR ALL

JUDICIAL AUTHORITY AND PRACTICE


N.A. ARTEBYAKINA

N.A. ARTEBYAKINA,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Department of Law, Psychology and Pedagogy, Ulyanovsk Agrarian University
named after P.A. Stolypin

DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-5-231-247

The article discusses some problems that have arisen in the field of civil and arbitration
proceedings generated by the threat of the spread of coronavirus infection in the territory
of the Russian Federation in late March – early May 2020. Subjects of civil procedural and
arbitration procedural relations were faced with insurmountable circumstances restricting
the right to access to justice. The situation is considered from the point of view of the
principle of judicial proceedings within a reasonable time, the principle of procedural
economy, legality. The category «cases of urgent nature» is analyzed, the correctness of
its use in judicial practice is questioned. The question is raised about the independence
of judges and their subordination only to the Constitution of the Russian Federation and
federal law as a guarantee of the right to an independent and fair trial. The threat of
the spread of coronavirus infection on the territory of the Russian Federation entailed
a violation of the rights and legitimate interests of persons participating in cases in civil
and arbitration proceedings. It was revealed that civil disputes (in the broad sense of the
word) at the end of March – beginning of May 2020 were left without proper attention from
the courts; the courts were unable to promptly respond to the current situation, effectively
carry out their functions, and provide large-scale remote access to justice.

Keywords: civil proceedings, arbitration proceedings, principles of civil procedure, access
to justice, limited access to justice, right to judicial protection, reasonable trial principle,
principle of procedural economy, principle of legality, independence of judges, pandemic,
distance justice.

References

Aleshkin A.A. Printsip protsessual’noi ekonomii: za i protiv [The Principle of Procedural
Economy: Pros and Cons]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta. Seriia «Pravo» – Herald
of Omsk University. Series “Law”, 2014, no. 3(40), pp. 179–186. (In Russ.)
Alisov A.N. Sootnoshenie konstitutsionnykh kategorii «dostup k pravosudiiu» i «sudebnaia
zashchita» [Correlation of the Constitutional Categories “Access to Justice” and
“Judicial Protection”]. Srednerusskii vestnik obshchestvennykh nauk – Central Russian
Bulletin of Social Sciences, 2015, no. 2(38), pp. 113–118. (In Russ.)
Argunova E.E. Usloviia obespecheniia prava na dostup k pravosudiiu [Conditions for
Ensuring the Right to Access to Justice]. Gosudarstvennaia sluzhba i kadry – State Service
and Personnel, 2018, no. 3, pp. 111–113. (In Russ.)
Artebyakina N.A. Zakon – glavnyi istochnik grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava
Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Law Is the Main Source of Civil Procedural Law of the Russian Federation].
In Isaenkova O.V. (ed.). Perspektivy razvitiia grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava:
sbornik statei po materialam III Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii,
posviashchennoi 85-letiiu so dnia rozhdeniia doktora iuridicheskikh nauk, professora
I.M. Zaitseva (g. Saratov, 14 sentiabria 2019 g.) [Prospects for the Development of Civil
Procedural Law: Collection of Articles Based on the Materials of the III International
Scientific and Practical Conference Dedicated to the 85th Anniversary of the Birth of
Doctor of Law, Professor I.M. Zaitsev (Saratov, 14 September 2019)]. Saratov: Publishing
House of the Saratov State Law Academy, 2019, pp. 31–35. (In Russ.)
Babaev V.K. (ed.). Teoriia gosudarstva i prava: uchebnik [Theory of State and Law:
Textbook]. Moscow: Iurist, 2002. 592 p. (In Russ.)
Bogomolov A.A., Isaenkova O.V., Sidorovnin A.A. Svoevremennost’ razresheniia
grazhdanskikh del kak zadacha grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Timeliness of Resolution
of Civil Cases as the Task of Civil Proceedings]. URL: https://www.lawmix.ru/
comm/4942. (In Russ.)
Borisova E.A. GPK RF: quo vadis? [Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation:
Quo Vadis?]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriia 11: Pravo – Herald of Moscow
University. Series 11: Law, 2013, no. 3, pp. 23–42. (In Russ.)
Borisova V.F. Protsessual’nye garantii dostupnosti pravosudiia pri obrashchenii v sud
obshchei iurisdiktsii [Procedural Guarantees of the Availability of Justice When Applying
to a Court of General Jurisdiction]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of
Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice, 2015, no. 5, pp. 56–60. (In Russ.)
Borisova V.F. Sootnoshenie mezhdunarodnykh i natsional’nykh pravovykh kategorii
v svete dostupnosti pravosudiia [Correlation of International and National Legal Categories
in the Light of Accessibility of Justice]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sootnoshenie-
mezhdunarodnykh-i-natsionalnykh-pravovykh-kategoriy-v-sfere-dostupnosti-
pravosudiya/viewer. (In Russ.)
Borisova V.F. Sudoustroistvennye garantii dostupnosti pravosudiia pri obrashchenii
v sud obshchei iurisdiktsii [Judicial Guarantees of Accessibility of Justice When Applying
to a Court of General Jurisdiction]. Pravo. Zakonodatel’stvo. Lichnost’ – Law. Legislation.
Personality, 2013, no. 1(16), pp. 13–19. (In Russ.)
Borodinova T.G. Pravo grazhdan na svobodnyi dostup k pravosudiiu: poniatie, soderzhanie,
sub”ekty [The Right of Citizens to Free Access to Justice: Concept, Content, Subjects].
URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/pravo-grazhdan-na-svobodnyy-dostupk-
pravosudiyu-ponyatie-soderzhanie-subekty/viewer. (In Russ.)
Isaenkova O.V.; Demichev A.A. (ed.). Ispolnitel’noe pravo v Rossiiskoi Federatsii:
osobennosti stanovleniia i perspektivy razvitiia [Executive Law in the Russian Federation:
Features of Formation and Development Prospects]. Moscow: Iurlitinform, 2007.
296 p. (In Russ.)
Krasheninnikov P.V. (ed.). Grazhdanskoe protsessual’noe pravo: uchebnik: v 2 t. T. 1:
Obshchaia chast’ [Civil Procedural Law: Textbook. In 2 vols. Vol. 1: General Part]. Moscow:
Statut, 2020. 489 p. (In Russ.)
Ozhegov S.I.; Shvedova N.Iu. (ed.). Slovar’ russkogo iazyka: 70 000 slov [Russian Dictionary:
70,000 Words]. 23rd ed. Moscow: Russkii iazyk 1990. 917 p. (In Russ.)
Voplenko N.N. Poniatie i vidy iuridicheskoi spravedlivosti [Concept and Types of
Legal Justice]. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriia 5: Iurisprudentsiia
– Herald of Volgograd State University. Series 5: Jurisprudence, 2011, no. 2(15),
pp. 7–17. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

N.A. Artebyakina (Ulyanovsk, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate
Professor, Department of Law, Psychology and Pedagogy, Ulyanovsk Agrarian University
named after P.A. Stolypin (1 New Wreath Blvd., Ulyanovsk, 432000, Russia; e-mail:
bna_81@mail.ru).

Recommended citation

Artebyakina N.A. …i pravosudie dlia vsekh […And Justice for All]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 231–247. (In
Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-5-231-247

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

Keywords