Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

CURRENT QUESTIONS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE ON THE APPLICATION OF LEGISLATION ON ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDINGS: THE EXPERIENCE OF THE TWELFTH ARBITRATION COURT OF APPEAL

JUDICIAL AUTHORITY AND PRACTICE


S.Yu. SHARAEV, D.Kh. VALEEV, T.V. VOLKOVA

S.Yu. SHARAEV,
Candidate of Legal Sciences,
Chairman of the Twelfth Arbitration Court of Appeal

D.Kh. VALEEV,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Deputy Dean of the Law Faculty,
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

T.V. VOLKOVA,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Land and Ecological Law,
Saratov State Law Academy, Judge of the Twelfth Arbitration Court of Appeal

This research is a scholarly and practical analysis of the Twelfth Arbitration Court of
Appeals’ 2019–2021 consideration of enforcement law disputes and includes selected
scholarly judgments based on law enforcement practice. According to statistics, between
2019 and 6 months of 2021, a total of 30,641 cases were heard by the Twelfth Arbitration
Court of Appeals, of which disputes related to the application of legislation on enforcement
proceedings – 425 cases, which amounted to 1.4% of all cases heard by the court. In 2019, the
court considered 14,880 cases, of which disputes related to the application of the legislation on
enforcement proceedings – 177 cases, or 1.2% of all cases considered by the court. As for the
cases of this category, 25 judicial acts of the courts of first instance were cancelled (changed)
by way of appeal, which amounted to 14.1% of the cases of this category. In 2020, the court
considered 10,931 cases, including 172 disputes related to application of the legislation on
enforcement proceedings, or 1.6% of all cases considered by the court. As for the cases of
this category, 18 judicial acts of the first instance courts were cancelled (changed) by way of
appeal, which amounted to 10.5% of all cases of this category. In the first half-year of 2021
the court considered 4,830 cases, of which 76 cases (1.6% of all cases considered by the court)
were disputes concerning application of the legislation on enforcement proceedings. As for the
cases of this category, 12 judicial acts of the courts of first instance were cancelled (changed)
by way of appeal, which amounted to 15.8% of all cases of this category.

Keywords: court practice; enforcement proceedings; scientific analysis; arbitration
procedure; court; appeal; appeal of judicial acts.

References

Bakurova N.N. Administrativnaia reforma i institut sudebnykh pristavov [Administrative
Reform and the Institution of Bailiffs]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni O.E. Kutafina
(MGIuA) – Kutafin Law Review, 2018, no. 1(41), pp. 78–84. (In Russ.)
Biakina M.M., Kachalov P.N., Mukaseeva N.N. Protsessual’nye problemy, voznikaiushchie
pri osparivanii reshenii i deistvii (bezdeistviia) organov gosudarstvennoi vlasti [Procedural
Problems Arising When Contesting the Decisions and Actions (Inaction) of Public
Authorities]. Iuridicheskaia nauka – Legal Science, 2021, no. 4, pp. 103–107. (In Russ.)
Dubets E.K., Stupina S.A. Osnovaniia neosvobozhdeniia dolzhnika ot obiazatel’stv
[Grounds of Debtor’s Non-Liability]. Vestnik Sibirskogo iuridicheskogo instituta MVD
Rossii – Herald of the Siberian Law Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia,
2020, no. 2(39), pp. 126–133. (In Russ.)
Efremova E.S. Pogashenie nedoimki za schet debitorskoi zadolzhennosti
nalogoplatel’shchika: nuzhno li vnosit’ izmeneniia v zakonodatel’stvo? [Repayment of
Arrears at the Expense of Taxpayer’s Receivables: Is It Necessary to Make Changes in
the Legislation?]. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava – Actual Problems of Russian
Law, 2019, no. 4(101), pp. 40–47. (In Russ.)
Fedotova Iu.G. Sudebnyi kontrol’ za ispolneniem sudebnykh reshenii v kontekste zashchity
prav i svobod cheloveka i grazhdanina [Judicial Control over Enforcement of Judicial
Decisions in the Context of Protection of Rights and Freedoms of Man and Citizen].
Vestnik OmGU. Seriia «Pravo» – Vestnik of Omsk State University. Series “Law”,
2013, no. 3(36), pp. 140–146. (In Russ.)
Frik O.V. Sozdanie besspornykh dokazatel’stv kak odna iz osnovnykh funktsii notariata
[Creation of Undisputed Evidence as One of the Main Functions of the Notariat].
Vestnik OmGU. Seriia «Pravo» – Vestnik of Omsk State University. Series “Law”, 2021,
vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 55–63. (In Russ.)
Galperin M.L. Ispolnitel’nye deistviia – mery otvetstvennosti? [Executive Actions – Measures
of Responsibility?]. Lex Russica – Lex Russica, 2018, no. 3(136), pp. 9–22. (In Russ.)
Galperin M.L. O «samostoiatel’noi» otvetstvennosti v ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve?
[On “Independent” Responsibility in Enforcement Proceedings?]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vys
shei shkoly ekonomiki – Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2015, no. 2,
pp. 202–225. (In Russ.)
Gritsai O.V., Gubina E.N. Tsifrovizatsiia kak sposob optimizatsii mekhanizma zashchity
grazhdanskih prav v sfere grazhdanskoi iurisdiktsii [Digitalization as a Way to Optimize the
Mechanism of Civil Rights Protection in Civil Jurisdiction]. Iuridicheskii vestnik Samarskogo
universiteta – Legal Herald of Samara University, 2019, no. 2, pp. 64–68. (In Russ.)
Iarkov V.V. Nekotorye printsipy grazhdanskogo ispolnitel’nogo prava (v sviazi s postanovleniem
Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossii № 10-P ot 12.07.2007 i novym Federal’nym zakonom
«Ob ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve») [Certain Principles of Civil Enforcement Law (in Connection
with the Decision of the Constitutional Court of Russia of 12 July 2007 No. 10-P
and the New Federal Law “On Enforcement Proceedings”)]. In Valeev D.Kh., Chelyshev
M.Iu. (eds.). Ispolnitel’noe proizvodstvo: protsessual’naia priroda i tsivilisticheskie osnovy:
sbornik materialov Vserossiiskoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii [Enforcement Proceedings:
Procedural Nature and Civil Foundations: Collection of Materials of the All-Russian
Scientific-Practical Conference]. Moscow: Statut, 2009, pp. 198–210. (In Russ.)
Isaenkova O.V. Pravovoe polozhenie advokatov i rol’ advokatury v ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve
[Legal Status of Lawyers and the Role of the Bar in Enforcement Proceedings].
Iuridicheskaia nauka i pravookhranitel’naia praktika – Legal Science and Law Enforcement
Practice, 2007, no. 1(2), pp. 94–103. (In Russ.)
Kotliarova V.V. O realizatsii obespechitel’noi mery v vide priostanovleniia vzyskaniia
po osparivaemomu ispolnitel’nomu ili inomu dokumentu, vzyskanie po kotoromu proizvoditsia
v besspornom (bezaktseptnom) poriadke v arbitrazhnom protsesse [On Realization
of Security Measure in the Form of Suspension of Recovery Upon Contested Executive
or Other Document, Which Is Recovered by Incontestable (Without Acceptance)
Procedure in Arbitration Proceedings]. Aktual’nye problemy rossiiskogo prava – Actual
Problems of Russian Law, 2018, no. 1(86), pp. 88–94. (In Russ.)
Makolkin N.N. Verifikatsiia i autentifikatsiia – dopolnitel’nye triggery formirovaniia
komfortnoi iurisdiktsii: postanovka problemy [Verification and Authentication – Additional
Triggers of Comfortable Jurisdiction Formation: Problem Statement]. In Valeev D.Kh.
(ed.). 2020 – Sovremennaia kodifikatsiia tsivilisticheskogo protsessual’nogo zakonodatel’stva:
vliianie na pravovuiu sistemu, iuridicheskuiu nauku i formirovanie komfortnoi iurisdiktsii:
materialy VII Simpoziuma zhurnala «Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa» (Kazan’, 25–26 sentiabria
2020 g.) [2020 – Modern Codification of Civil Procedural Legislation: Impact on
Legal System, Legal Science and Comfortable Jurisdiction Formation: Proceedings of the
VII Symposium of the Journal “Herald of Civil Procedure” (Kazan, 25–26 September
2020)]. Kazan: Kazan University Publishing House, 2020, pp. 101–106. (In Russ.)
Maleshin D.Ia. Dvizhenie dela po stadiiam v ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve [Case Flow
by Stages in Enforcement Proceedings]. Ispolnitel’noe pravo – Executive Law, 2016, no. 1,
pp. 22–25. (In Russ.)
Morkovskaia K.S. Perspektivy razvitiia sistemy prinuditel’nogo ispolneniia sudebnykh
postanovlenii [Prospects of Development of the System of Compulsory Execution of
Court Judgments]. Russian Journal of Economics and Law – Russian Journal of Economics
and Law, 2015, no. 2(34), pp. 221–227. (In Russ.)
Morkovskaia K.S. Vnedrenie mediativnykh protsedur kak sredstvo povysheniia effektivnosti
ispolnitel’nogo proizvodstva [Introduction of Mediation Procedures as a Means
to Improve the Efficiency of Enforcement Proceedings]. Vestnik PAGS – Bulletin of the
Volga State Academy of Public Administration, 2016, no. 3(54), pp. 56–61. (In Russ.)
Shemeneva O.N. Otraslevaia prinadlezhnost’ i osobennosti pravovogo regulirovaniia
instituta mirovogo soglasheniia [Branch Affiliation and Peculiarities of Legal Regulation
of the Institute of Amicable Agreement]. Vestnik VGU. Seriia: Pravo – Bulletin of
Voronezh State University. Series: Law, 2012, no. 2(13), pp. 179–186. (In Russ.)
Sitnikov D. Ustupka prava trebovaniia, novatsiia i inye al’ternativnye sposoby dosudebnogo
uregulirovaniia sporov, sviazannykh s vzyskaniem zadolzhennosti [Assignment of
Claim, Novation and Other Alternative Methods of Pre-Trial Settlement of Disputes
Connected with Debt Recovery]. Imushchestvennye otnosheniia v RF – Property Relations
in the Russian Federation, 2011, no. 2, pp. 95–100. (In Russ.)
Streltsova E.G. Dobrovol’noe ispolnenie [Voluntary Enforcement]. Vestnik Universiteta imeni
O.E. Kutafina (MGIuA) – Kutafin Law Review, 2017, no. 3(31), pp. 88–93. (In Russ.)
Tereshchenko L.K. Gosudarstvennyi kontrol’ v sfere zashchity personal’nykh dannykh
[State Control in the Field of Personal Data Protection]. Pravo. Zhurnal Vysshei shkoly
ekonomiki – Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2018, no. 4, pp. 142–161.
(In Russ.)
Tumanov D.A. Prikaznoe proizvodstvo v nastoiashchee vremia: protsess ili fiktsiia
protsessa? [Sentence Proceedings Nowadays: A Process or a Fiction of a Process?]. Zhurnal
rossiiskogo prava – Journal of Russian Law, 2008, no. 7(139), pp. 66–76. (In Russ.)
Valeev D.Kh. Grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo v Rossii: reforma i sovremennoe sostoianie
[Civil Litigation in Russia: Reform and Present Situation]. Filchenko D.G. (ed.). Sudebnye
i nesudebnye formy zashchity grazhdanskih prav: sbornik statei k iubileiu doktora iuridicheskikh
nauk, professora Eleny Ivanovny Nosyrevoi [Judicial and Non-Judicial Forms of
Civil Rights Protection: Collection of Articles on the Jubilee of Doctor of Law, Professor
Elena Ivanovna Nosyreva]. Moscow: Infortropic Media, 2020, pp. 21–30. (In Russ.)
Valeev D.Kh. Sistema protsessual’nykh garantii prav grazhdan i organizatsii v ispolnitel’nom
proizvodstve [The System of Procedural Guarantees of the Rights of Citizens and
Organizations in Enforcement Proceedings]. Moscow: Statut, 2009. 351 p. (In Russ.)
Valeev D.Kh., Kuzbagarov A.N. Primirenie storon v ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve: nekotorye
spornye aspekty [Conciliation of the Parties in Enforcement Proceedings: Some
Disputable Aspects]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta MVD Rossii – Herald
of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2005, no. 4,
pp. 86–89. (In Russ.)
Valeev D.Kh., Makolkin N.N. Prognozirovanie dinamiki sudebnoi zashchity v usloviiakh
tsifrovizatsii [Predicting the Dynamics of Judicial Protection in the Context of Digitalization].
Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10,
no. 3, pp. 227–243. (In Russ.)
Valeev D.Kh., Makolkin N.N. Sovremennaia reforma grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva,
tsifrovizatsiia i voprosy sudebnoi ekspertizy [Modern Civil Procedure Reform, Digitalization
and Problems of Judicial Expertise]. Sudebnaia ekspertiza: pravovye i estestvenno-
nauchnye aspekty: sbornik statei [Forensic Expertise: Legal and Natural Science
Aspects: Collection of Articles]. Izhevsk: Publishing Center “Udmurt University”, 2020,
pp. 374–379. (In Russ.)
Vinnikov Iu.V., Timoshenko A.V. Nekotorye problemy ischisleniia srokov pri ispolnenii
postanovlenii po delam ob administrativnykh pravonarusheniiakh [Some Problems
of Calculating Deadlines for the Execution of Decisions on Administrative Offenses].
Vestnik IuUrGU. Seriia: Pravo – Bulletin of South Ural State University. Series: Law, 2006,
no. 5(60), pp. 222–224. (In Russ.)
Zagalaeva Zh.A. Analiz sovremennogo opyta ispolnitel’nogo proizvodstva v Rossiiskoi
Federatsii [Analysis of Modern Experience of Enforcement Proceedings in the
Russian Federation]. Evraziiskii nauchnyi zhurnal – Eurasian Scientific Journal, 2016,
no. 6, pp. 255–257. (In Russ.)
Zhadan V.N. K voprosu ob ispolnenii sudebnykh postanovlenii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve
[On the Execution of Court Orders in Civil Proceedings]. Iuridicheskaia
nauka – Legal Science, 2021, no. 3, pp. 65–71. (In Russ.)
Zherebtsova E.E., Molochkov A.A. Praktika rassmotreniia konstitutsionnym sudom
Rossiiskoi Federatsii obrashchenii po voprosam ispolnitel’nogo proizvodstva [Practice of
Consideration by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of Appeals on
Questions of Enforcement Proceedings]. Teoriia i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiia –
Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2015, no. 16, pp. 107–110. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

S.Yu. Sharaev (Saratov, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Chairman of the
Twelfth Arbitration Court of Appeal (30, Bldg. 2 Lermontov St., Saratov, 410002, Russia;
e-mail: info@12aas.arbitr.ru).

D.Kh. Valeev (Kazan, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Deputy Dean of
the Law Faculty, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University (18 Kremlevskaia St., Kazan,
420008, Russia; e-mail: valeev55@gmail.com).

T.V. Volkova (Saratov, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Department of Land and Ecological Law, Saratov State Law Academy, Judge of the
Twelfth Arbitration Court of Appeal (30, Bldg. 2 Lermontov St., Saratov, 410002, Russia;
e-mail: tvolkova64@mail.ru).

Recommended citation

Sharaev S.Yu., Valeev D.Kh., Volkova T.V. Aktual’nye voprosy pravoprimenitel’noi
praktiki po primeneniiu zakonodatel’stva ob ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve: opyt Dvenadtsatogo
arbitrazhnogo apelliatsionnogo suda [Current Questions of Law Enforcement
Practice on the Application of Legislation on Enforcement Proceedings: The Experience
of the Twelfth Arbitration Court of Appeal]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa
– Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 251–281. (In Russ.) https://doi.
org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-4-251-281

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

Keywords