Herald of Civil Procedure

We in a citing index:




LL.M., Postgraduate Student, Department of the Theory of State and Law,
Ural State Law University

DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-6-193-223

The article examines the issue of the procedural status of various aliens (individuals and legal
entities, international organizations and states) in the international civil procedure of Russia
and the United States of America. The author comes to conclusion that the determination of
the composition of the parties of international commercial dispute (as well as the qualification
of their claims and forms of legal protection) should be determined on the basis of lex
(processualis) causae, reflecting the essence of the substantive disputed relationship and the
peculiarities of its qualifications from the point of view of national law. The study analyzes the
features of the procedural position of specific categories of actors (individuals and legal entities,
international organizations and states), as well as persons facilitating justice in international
commercial disputes. The article states that the limits of foreign procedural law application to
the procedural status of an alien in Russian civil proceedings is mediated by his connection
with the essence of the substantive disputed relationship. Depending on the nature of such
a connection, the author proposes to divide aliens as actors of international civil procedure
into two groups: persons directly related to the disputed legal relationship and, therefore,
subordinate lex processualis personalis (parties, third parties and their representatives) and
persons, communication which with a controversial legal relationship is of an indirect nature
and the procedural status of which is therefore regulated by lex fori (witnesses, experts,
specialists and translators). Also, the study pays attention to the problems of jurisdictional
immunity of a foreign state and conflict aspects of fraudulent joinder.

Keywords: international civil procedure; aliens; international civil procedure actors;
jurisdictional immunity; fraudulent joinder.


Abolonin G.O. Grazhdanskoe protsessual’noe pravo SShA: monografiia [Civil Procedure
of the U.S.: Monograph]. Moscow: Wolters Kluwer, 2010. 432 p. (In Russ.)
Agalarova M.A. Protsessual’nye osobennosti uchastiia inostrannykh lits v grazhdanskom
sudoproizvodstve: dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Procedural Features of the Foreign
Persons’ Participation in Civil Procedure: Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences].
Saratov, 2017. 218 p. (In Russ.)
Anufrieva L.P. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: v 3 t. T. 2: Osobennaia chast’ [Private
International Law. In 3 books. Vol. 3: Specific Part]. Moscow: BEK, 2000. 656 p. (In Russ.)
Artebiakina N.A. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy instituta lits, uchastvuiushchikh
v dele: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Theoretical and Practical Issues of the
Institute of Procedural Participants: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law
Sciences]. Saratov, 2010. 22 p. (In Russ.)
Born G. International Civil Litigation in U.S. Courts: Commentary and Materials.
3rd ed. Boston: Kluwer Law International, 1996. 1145 p.
Brownlie Y.; Andrianova S.N. (trans.); Tunkin G.I. (ed.). Mezhdunarodnoe pravo.
Kn. II [International Law. Book II]. Moscow: Progress, 1977. 509 p. (In Russ.)
Chechot D.M. Uchastniki grazhdanskogo protsessa [Participants of Civil Procedure].
In Chechot D.M. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu protsessu [Selected Works on Civil
Procedure]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Publishing House, 2005, pp. 85–234.
(In Russ.)
Fomina A.Iu. Preobrazovanie protsessual’nogo polozheniia lits, uchastvuiushchikh
v dele, pri vzaimodeistvii norm material’nogo i protsessual’nogo prava [Transformation
of the Procedural Status of Civil Procedural Participants Under the Interaction of
Substantive and Procedural Legal Norms]. Vestnik Saratovskoi gosudarstvennoi iuridicheskoi
akademii – Herald of Saratov State Law Academy, 2015, no. 3(104), pp. 204–
209. (In Russ.)
Getman-Pavlova I.V. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: uchebnik [Private International
Law: Handbook]. Moscow: Eksmo, 2005. 752 p. (In Russ.)
Getman-Pavlova I.V. Protsessual’nye kollizionnye normy v mezhdunarodnom chastnom
prave i mezhdunarodnom grazhdanskom protsesse [Procedural Conflict Rules in
Private International Law and International Civil Procedure]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava
– Journal of Russian Law, 2018, no. 3(255), pp. 84–96. (In Russ.)
Goncharova O.S. Souchastie v grazhdanskom protsesse Rossii i SShA: monografiia
[Complicity in the Civil Procedure of Russia and the USA: Monograph]. Moscow:
Prospekt, 2015. 208 p. (In Russ.)
Gordon V.M. Pravo na sudebnuiu zashchitu po Grazhdanskomu protsessual’nomu
kodeksu RSFSR [The Right to Court Defense Under the RSFSR Civil Procedure Code].
Vestnik sovetskoi iustitsii – Herald of Soviet Justice, 1924, no. 1, pp. 1–5. (In Russ.)
Grabar V.E. Nachalo ravenstva gosudarstv v mezhdunarodnom prave [The Origin of
the States’ Equity in International Law]. Zhurnal MID – Journal of Ministry of International
Affairs, 1912, vol. 1, pp. 138–195. (In Russ.)
Gukasian R.E. Problema interesa v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsessual’nom prave
[The Problem of Interest in Soviet Civil Procedure Law]. Saratov: Volga Book Publishing
House, 1970. 190 p. (In Russ.)
Iarkov V.V. Iuridicheskie fakty v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Legal Facts in Civil Procedure].
Moscow: Infotropic Media, 2012. 608 p. (In Russ.)
Iarkov V.V. Proizvol’naia podsudnost’ [Random Jurisdiction]. ezh-Iurist – ej-Lawyer,
2007, no. 34, p. 7. (In Russ.)
Iudin A.V. Iskusstvennoe sozdanie i izmenenie podvedomstvennosti i podsudnosti
ehkonomicheskogo spora sudu kak forma zloupotrebleniia protsessual’nymi pravami
[Fraudulent Establishment and Transformation of Economical Dispute’s Jurisdiction as
a Form of Abuse of Civil Procedural Rights]. Khoziaistvo i pravo – Economy and Law,
2008, no. 1, pp. 102–109. (In Russ.)
Kanashevskii V.A. Publichno-pravovye obrazovaniya RF kak sub”ekty mezhdunarodnogo
chastnogo prava [RF Public Entities as Subjects of Private International Law].
Zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava – Journal of Private International Law, 2003,
no. 3(41), pp. 3–14. (In Russ.)
Kanashevskii V.A. Sdelki s uchastiem inostrannogo gosudarstva v mezhdunarodnom
chastnom prave [Foreign States’ Deals in Private International Law]. Zhurnal mezhdunarodnogo
chastnogo prava – Journal of Private International Law, 2006, no. 1(51),
pp. 3–15. (In Russ.)
Kontseptsiia edinogo Grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii
[The Concept of the Uniform Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Moscow:
Statut, 2015. 224 p. (In Russ.)
Kusheva R.Sh. Pravovye voprosy deiatel’nosti mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii v chastnopravovykh
otnosheniiakh mezhdunarodnogo kharaktera: avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid.
nauk [Legal Affairs of International Organizations’ Activities in Private International
Relations: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Kazan, 2008.
22 p. (In Russ.)
Lebedev V.A. Finansovoe pravo. Vyp. 1 [Financial Law. Issue 1]. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg:
A.M. Wolf Publ., 1889. 828 p. (In Russ.)
Lukashuk I.I. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Osobennaia chast’: ucheb. dlia studentov iurid.
fak. i vuzov [International Law. Specific Part: Handbook for Law Students]. 3rd ed. Moscow:
Wolters Kluwer, 2005. 432 p. (In Russ.)
Lunts L.A., Marysheva N.I. Kurs mezhdunarodnogo chastnogo prava: v 3 t. T. 3: Mezhdunarodnyi
grazhdanskii protsess [Course of Private International Law. In 3 vols. Vol. 3:
International Civil Procedure]. Moscow: Spark, 2002. 1007 p. (In Russ.)
Malyshev K.I. Kurs grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Course of Civil Procedure].
St. Petersburg: M.M. Stasyulevich Publ., 1876. 444 p. (In Russ.)
Morelli G. Diritto processuale civile internazionale. 2ª ed. Padova: SEDAM, 1954. 341 p.
Nefediev E.A. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Handbook of
Russian Civil Procedure]. Krasnodar: Sovetskaia Kuban, 2005. 480 p. (In Russ.)
Neshataeva T.N. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnyi grazhdanskii
protsess: uchebnyi kurs v trekh chastiakh [Private International Law and International Civil
Procedure: Training Course in Three Parts]. Moscow: Gorodets, 2004. 624 p. (In Russ.)
Puchkov V.O. Kosvennyi isk kak sredstvo zashchity korporativnykh prav v Rossii i za
rubezhom: material’no-pravovye problemy [Indirect Claim as a Remedy of Corporate
Rights’ Protection in Russian and Foreign Law: The Issues of Substantive Law]. Arbitrazhnye
spory – Arbitration Disputes, 2017, no. 3(79), pp. 122–134. (In Russ.)
Reshetnikova I.V., Iarkov V.V. Grazhdanskoe pravo i grazhdanskii protsess v sovremennoi
Rossii [Civil Law and Procedure in Modern Russia]. Moscow: Norma, 1999.
312 p. (In Russ.)
Richardson M.J. Clarifying and Limiting Fraudulent Joinder. Florida Law Review,
2016, vol. 58(1), рр. 119–184.
Rosenthal P. Improper Joinder: Confronting Plaintiffs’ Attempts to Destroy Federal Subject
Matter Jurisdiction. American University Law Review, 2009, vol. 59(1), pp. 49–80.
Sakhnova T.V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa [Course of Civil Procedure]. 2nd ed.
Moscow: Statut, 2014. 784 p. (In Russ.)
Shakarian M.S. Sub”ekty sovetskogo grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava [Subjects
of Soviet Civil Procedural Law]. Moscow: All-Union Correspondence Juridical Institute
Publ., 1970. 213 p. (In Russ.)
Shemeneva O.N. Rol’ protsessual’nykh soglashenii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve:
dis. … dokt. iurid. nauk [The Role of Procedural Agreements in Civil Procedure: Thesis
for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences]. Voronezh, 2017. 432 p. (In Russ.)
Solopova N.S., Puchkov V.O. Predstavitel’stvo v grazhdanskom protsessual’nom prave
Rossii i inostrannykh gosudarstv: problemy i perspektivy [Representation in Russian and
Foreign Civil Procedure: Problems and Prospects]. Sovremennaia nauka: aktual’nye
problemy teorii i praktiki. Seriia «Ekonomika i pravo» – Modern Science: Actual Issues of
Theory and Practice. Series of Economy and Law, 2017, no. 5, pp. 107–112. (In Russ.)
Soloviev A.A. Kvalifikatsionnye trebovaniia k predstaviteliam v administrativnom
sudebnom protsesse (zarubezhnyi opyt) [Qualification Requirements of Administrative
Court Procedure Representatives (Foreign Experience)]. Vestnik Finansovogo universiteta
– Herald of Financial University, 2016, no. 2(92), pp. 137–144. (In Russ.)
Stewart D.P. The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act: A Guide for Judges. Washington:
Federal Judicial Center, 2013. 177 p.
Szászy I. International Civil Procedure: A Comparative Study. Leyden: A.W. Sijthoff,
1967. 708 p.
Szászy I. The Basic Connecting Factor in International Cases in the Domain of Civil
Procedure. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 1966, vol. 15(2), pp. 436–456.
Tille A.A. Vremia, prostranstvo, zakon. Deistvie sovetskogo zakona vo vremeni i prostranstve
[Time, Space, Law. The Effect of Soviet Law in Time and Space]. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia
literatura, 1965. 203 p. (In Russ.)
Tumanov S.N. Mezhdunarodnye mezhpravitel’stvennye organizatsii: poniatie
i funktsional’naia kharakteristika [International Non-Government Organizations: The
Concepts and Functional Characteristics]. Voprosy rossiiskogo i mezhdunarodnogo prava –
Affairs of Russian and International Law, 2016, vol. 6, no. 11A, pp. 3–16. (In Russ.)
Vaskovskii E.V. Rukovodstvo k tolkovaniiu i primeneniiu zakonov (dlia nachinaiushchikh
iuristov) [A Handbook of Interpretation and Application of Laws (for Beginning
Lawyers)]. Moscow: Bashmakov Brothers Publ.; I.N. Kushnerev & Co. Publishing
House, 1913. 158 p. (In Russ.)
Vaskovskii E.V. Uchebnik grazhdanskogo prava. Vyp. 1: Vvedenie i obshchaia chast’
[Handbook of Civil Law. Part 1: An Introduction and General Part]. St. Petersburg:
N.K. Martynov Publ., 1894. 169 p. (In Russ.)
Vikut M.A. Storony – osnovnye litsa iskovogo proizvodstva [Parties as the Main
Actors of Claim Procedure]. In M.A. Vikut – 60 let nauchno-pedagogicheskoi deiatel’nosti
[M.A. Vikut – 60 Years of Scientific and Pedagogical Activity]. Saratov: Saratov State
Academy of Law Publishing House, 2007, pp. 5–74. (In Russ.)
Vylegzhanin A.N. (ed.). Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: uchebnik [International Law: Handbook].
2nd ed. Moscow: Iurait, 2010. 904 p. (In Russ.)
Zavialova N.Iu. Vliianie inostrannogo elementa na sub”ekt pravootnoshenii [The Influence
of Foreign Element on the Subject of Legal Relations]. Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta
MVD Rossii – Herald of Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Inner Affairs of
the Russian Federation, 2013, no. 1(19), pp. 13–16. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

V.O. Puchkov (Yekaterinburg, Russia) – LL.M., Postgraduate Student, Department
of the Theory of State and Law, Ural State Law University (20 Verkh-Isetsky Blvd., Yekaterinburg,
620028, Russia; e-mail: puchkovandpartners@gmail.com).

Recommended citation

Puchkov V.O. Inostrannye litsa kak sub”ekty mezhdunarodnogo grazhdanskogo
protsessa v Rossii i SShA: problema sudebnogo rassmotreniia mezhdunarodnykh kommercheskikh
sporov [Aliens as International Civil Procedure Actors in Russian and U.S.
Law: The Issue of International Commercial Litigation]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa
– Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 193–223. (In Russ.) https://doi.

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png