Herald of Civil Procedure
RU
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

subscribe bluebook itunes twitter vk youtube
library ulrichs-webGoogleСнимок экрана 2015-12-25 в 19.31.28.pngCrossref.pngVAK logo.pngHEIN logo.png

ON THE SPIRIT OF PROCEDURAL LAWS AND PROCEDURAL LEGAL INTERESTS

PROBLEMS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE


S.A. BURMISTROVA

S.A. BURMISTROVA,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Head of the Department of Civil Procedural Law, Ural Branch
of Russian State University of Justice

The article is devoted to substantiating the idea that the composition of legal permits regulated
by procedural law is not limited to procedural subjective rights, as it may seem from a literal
reading of procedural laws. Part of what the legislation calls procedural rights is actually
procedural legal interests, since their implementation depends on judicial discretion, and
therefore it is impossible to be sure that an attempt to implement them will lead to the desired
result for the interested person. On the other hand, if the realization of such interests does take
place, the judicial act will give such an interest the force of a subjective right, which indicates
the ability of procedural interests to turn into procedural rights. The objects of procedural
legal interests are investigated. It is shown that procedural interests can be directed to the
process and to a certain result of the court’s consideration of the appeal on the merits. The
procedural interest aimed at ensuring that the appeal gets to the court is a necessary stage
in the realization of the interest in a certain result of the consideration of the appeal, in
connection with which the first of the interests was designated as preliminary, the second
as final. The range of possible holders of procedural interests is analyzed. The conclusion
is obtained, according to which the court is not among the potential owners of procedural
interests due to its position of authority in the process. The differentiation of procedural legal
interests according to the procedural role of their owners is carried out. In accordance with this
criterion, it is proposed to distinguish procedural interests that coincide, agree and contradict
the procedural role. The obtained theoretical conclusion made it possible to make a proposal
to expand the number of persons subject to recusal if their personal interests contradict the
procedural role performed. The mentioned proposal applies to persons acting in the process
of protecting the interests of others and the interests of an indefinite circle of persons.

Keywords: procedural legal interests; legitimate interests in procedural law; owners of
procedural legal interests; procedural benefit; ratio of procedural legal interests with the
procedural role.

References

Akhmerov R.A. Sud kak sub”ekt grazhdanskikh protsessual’nykh pravootnoshenii [The
Court as a Subject of Civil Procedural Legal Relations]. Krymskii nauchnyi vestnik –
Crimean Scientific Bulletin, 2016, no. 6(12), pp. 113–120. (In Russ.)
Burmistrova S.A. O pravovoi prirode protsessual’nykh interesov [On the Legal Nature
of Procedural Interests]. Iurist – Lawyer, 2018, no. 8, pp. 45–51. (In Russ.)
Burmistrova S.A. Protsessual’nyi interes: dialektika formy i soderzhaniia [Procedural
Interest: The Dialectic of Form and Content]. Rossiiskii sud’ia – Russian Judge, 2018, no. 10,
pp. 8–12. (In Russ.)
Butnev V.V. Grazhdanskie protsessual’nye pravootnosheniia [Civil Procedural Legal
Relations]. In Problemy zashchity sub”ektivnykh grazhdanskikh prav [Problems of Protection
of Subjective Civil Rights]. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State University Publ., 2007, pp. 3–21.
(In Russ.)
Ershov V.V. Sposoby zashchity trudovykh prav i pravovykh interesov v sfere truda
[Ways to Protect Labor Rights and Legal Interests in the Field of Labor]. Rossiiskoe pravosudie
– Russian Justice, 2011, no. 5(61), pp. 60–66. (In Russ.)
Gadzhieva R.F., Stepanov E.S. Sud kak osnovnoi sub”ekt grazhdanskikh protsessual’nykh
pravootnoshenii [The Court as the Main Subject of Civil Procedural Legal Relations].
Evraziiskii soiuz uchenykh – Eurasian Union of Scientists, 2016, no. 3(24), pp. 15–16.
(In Russ.)
Gukasian R.E. Problema interesa v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsessual’nom prave
[The Problem of Interest in Soviet Civil Procedural Law]. Saratov: Volga Book Publishing
House, 1970. 190 p. (In Russ.)
Ivanova M.A. Nekotorye osobennosti grazhdanskikh protsessual’nykh pravootnoshenii
[Some Features of Civil Procedural Legal Relations]. Trudy Orenburgskogo instituta
(filiala) Moskovskoi gosudarstvennoi iuridicheskoi akademii – Proceedings of the
Orenburg Institute (Branch) of the Moscow State Law Academy, 2016, no. 27, pp. 60–65.
(In Russ.)
Khisamov A.Kh. Nekotorye voprosy sub”ektnogo sostava tsivilisticheskogo protsessa
[Some Questions of the Subject Composition of Civil Procedure]. Uchenye zapiski
Kazanskogo filiala Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta pravosudiia – Scientific
Notes of the Kazan Branch of Russian State University of Justice, 2015, vol. 11, pp. 159–
164. (In Russ.)
Kliaus N.V. K voprosu o klassifikatsii protsessual’nykh zakonnykh interesov [On Classification
of Procedural Legitimate Interests]. In Lebedev V.M., Osokina G.L., Solomin S.K.,
Arakcheev V.S. (eds.). Pravovye problemy ukrepleniia rossiiskoi gosudarstvennosti [Legal
Problems of Strengthening the Russian Statehood]. Tomsk: Tomsk State University Publ.,
2014, pp. 110–111. (In Russ.)
Kliaus N.V. Kriterii protsessual’nykh zakonnykh interesov v grazhdanskom protsesse
[Criteria of Procedural Legitimate Interests in Civil Procedure]. Vestnik Omskogo universiteta.
Seriia «Pravo» – Herald of Omsk University. Series “Law”, 2017, no. 1(50), pp.
162–165. (In Russ.)
Kliaus N.V. Protsessual’nye zakonnye interesy uchastnikov grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva
[Procedural Legal Interests of Participants in Civil Proceedings]. Gumanitarnye
nauki v Sibiri – Humanities in Siberia. 2006, no. 1, pp. 86–91. (In Russ.)
Malko A.V., Subochev V.V. Zakonnye interesy kak pravovaia kategoriia [Legitimate
Interests as a Legal Category]. St. Petersburg: Iuridicheskii tsentr Press, 2004. 359 p.
(In Russ.)
Rozhkova M.A. Iuridicheskie fakty grazhdanskogo i protsessual’nogo prava: soglasheniia
o zashchite prav i protsessual’nye soglasheniia [Legal Facts of Civil and Procedural
Law: Agreements on the Protection of Rights and Procedural Agreements]. Moscow:
Statut, 2009. 332 p. (In Russ.)
Shemeneva O.N. Sud kak sub”ekt grazhdanskikh protsessual’nykh pravootnoshenii
[The Court as a Subject of Civil Procedural Legal Relations]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo
universiteta. Seriia «Pravo» – Herald of Voronezh State University. Series
“Law”, 2015, no. 3, pp. 67–76. (In Russ.)
Subochev V.V. Zakonnye interesy [Legitimate Interests]. Moscow: Norma, 2008.
496 p. (In Russ.)
Zelentsov A.B. Sub”ektivnoe publichnoe pravo: uchebnoe posobie [Subjective Public
Law: Tutorial]. Moscow: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia Publ., 2012. 146 p.
(In Russ.)

Information about the author

S.A. Burmistrova (Chelyabinsk, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Senior Lecturer,
Head of the Department of Civil Procedural Law, Ural Branch of Russian State
University of Justice (63v Energetikov St., Chelyabinsk, 454135, Russia; e-mail: lelsi@
yandex.ru).

Recommended citation

Burmistrova S.A. O dukhe protsessual’nykh zakonov i protsessual’nykh pravovykh
interesakh [On the Spirit of Procedural Laws and Procedural Legal Interests]. Vestnik
grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2022, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 71–85. (In
Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2022-12-1-71-85

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

Keywords