Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

PROCEDURAL RESPONSIBILITY AND IRRESPONSIBILITY, PROCEDURAL AND NATIONAL SECURITY: PROBLEMS OF RELATIONSHIP AND SYSTEM COMMUNICATIONS

PROBLEMS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE


D.A. LIPINSKY, A.A. MUSATKINA, E.V. CHUKLOVA

D.A. LIPINSKY,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Magistracy Department,
Togliatti State University

A.A. MUSATKINA,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Magistracy,
Togliatti State University

E.V. CHUKLOVA,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Department of Business and Labor Law,
Tolyatti State University

DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-4-149-166

The authors of the article investigate the problem of legal regulation of ensuring national
security. The integrative nature of procedural responsibility and procedural security is
substantiated, without which regulation of other varieties of national security is impossible.
First of all, attention is paid to the institutional aspects of procedural responsibility
and procedural security, which are designed to provide, inter alia, legal provisions on
national security. As the opposite of procedural responsibility at the institutional level, the
procedural irresponsibility of participants in the process is examined, the prerequisites for
the manifestation of which are either the absence of norms of procedural responsibility or
an excessive number of norms that enshrine all measures of procedural responsibility. In the
field of legal practice, procedural irresponsibility entails a violation of the basic principles
of legal proceedings, such as equality and adversarial proceedings and the principle of
independence of judges. As part of the application of procedural liability for contempt of
court, the issue of providing convincing evidence is not raised at all. In addition, there
are significant comments on the order of execution of court decisions. In most judicial
decisions, the descriptive and motivating part does not reflect the analysis of evidence of
contempt of court and their judicial evaluation.

Keywords: procedural responsibility; procedural irresponsibility; national security;
procedural security; procedural offense; system relations.

References

Antonova E.Iu. Osobennosti otsenki dokazatel’stv po vnutrennemu ubezhdeniiu pri
rassmotrenii sudami ugolovnykh del v osobom poriadke priniatiia sudebnogo resheniia
[Features of Evaluation of Evidence Based on Internal Conviction When Considering
Criminal Cases by Courts in a Special Procedure for Making a Court Decision]. Rossiiskii
sud’ia – Russian Judge, 2015, no. 6, pp. 31–33. (In Russ.)
Bezrukikh V. Nadumannaia volokita [A Far-Fetched Red Tape]. ezh-Iurist – ej-Lawyer,
2008, no. 36. (In Russ.)
Chuklova E.V. O poniatii protsessual’noi bezopasnosti i ee meste v sisteme natsional’noi
bezopasnosti [On the Concept of Procedural Security and its Place in the National Security
System]. Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo – Business. Education. Law, 2019, no. 4(49), pp. 349–
354. (In Russ.)
Chuklova E.V. Protsessual’naia otvetstvennost’ i protsessual’naia bezotvetstvennost’:
priznaki, vzaimosviazi, sootnoshenie s inymi ugrozami natsional’noi bezopasnosti [Procedural
Responsibility and Procedural Irresponsibility: Signs, Relationships, Correlation
with Other Threats to National Security]. Agrarnoe i zemel’noe pravo – Agrarian
and Land Law, 2019, no. 12, pp. 12–16. (In Russ.)
Chuklova E.V. Vzaimosviaz’ instituta protsessual’noi otvetstvennosti s pravootnosheniiami
i iuridicheskoi praktikoi [Interrelation of the Institute of Procedural Responsibility
with Legal Relations and Legal Practice]. Iuridicheskie issledovaniia – Legal Research,
2019, no. 10, pp. 73–85. (In Russ.)
Iakovlev V.F. Izbrannye trudy. T. 3: Arbitrazhnye sudy: stanovlenie i razvitie [Selected
Works. Vol. 3: Arbitration Courts: Formation and Development]. Moscow, 2013.
749 p. (In Russ.)
Iudin A. Otvetstvennost’ za neuvazhenie k sudu [Liability for Contempt of Court].
ezh-Iurist – ej-Lawyer, 2006, no. 20. (In Russ.)
Lipinskii D.A. Iuridicheskaia otvetstvennost’ i bezotvetstvennost’ kak parnye iuridicheskie
kategorii [Legal Responsibility and Irresponsibility as Paired Legal Categories].
Iuridicheskaia nauka i pravookhranitel’naia praktika – Legal Science and Law Enforcement
Practice, 2019, no. 2(48), pp. 6–24. (In Russ.)
Lipinskii D.A., Musatkina A.A. Iuridicheskaia otvetstvennost’ i bezotvetstvennost’, pravovaia
i natsional’naia bezopasnost’: problemy sootnosheniia i sistemnykh sviazei [Legal
Responsibility and Irresponsibility, Legal and National Security: Problems of Correlation
and Systemic Relations]. Iuridicheskaia nauka i pravookhranitel’naia praktika –
Legal Science and Law Enforcement Practice, 2019, no. 4(50), pp. 6–17. (In Russ.)
Popov V.V., Trishina E.G. Antikorruptsionnye polozheniia v grazhdanskom
protsessual’nom prave [Anti-Corruption Provisions in Civil Procedural Law]. Iuridicheskaia
nauka – Legal Science, 2016, no. 6, pp. 166–168. (In Russ.)
Ter-Akopov A.A. Iuridicheskaia bezopasnost’ cheloveka v Rossiiskoi Federatsii (osnovy
kontseptsii) [Legal Human Security in the Russian Federation (Basic Concepts)]. Gosudarstvo
i pravo – State and Law, 2001, no. 9, pp. 11–18. (In Russ.)
Valeev D.Kh. Protsessual’naia otvetstvennost’ v ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve [Procedural
Responsibility in Enforcement Proceedings]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava – Journal
of Russian Law, 2004, no. 4, pp. 31–37. (In Russ.)
Valeev D.Kh., Chelyshev M.Iu. Grazhdansko-pravovye sredstva v protsessual’nom
mekhanizme realizatsii prav grazhdan i organizatsii v ispolnitel’nom proizvodstve [Civil
Law Remedies in the Procedural Mechanism for the Realization of the Rights of Citizens
and Organizations in Enforcement Proceedings]. Ispolnitel’noe parvo – Enforcement
Law, 2009, no. 4, pp. 12–16. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

D.A. Lipinsky (Togliatti, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Magistracy
Department, Togliatti State University (14 Belorusskaia St., Togliatti, 445020, Russia;
e-mail: Dmitri8@ yandex.ru)

A.A. Musatkina (Togliatti, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Department of Magistracy, Togliatti State University (14 Belorusskaia St., Togliatti,
445020, Russia; e-mail: Musatkinaaa@mail.ru)

E.V. Chuklova (Togliatti, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Department of Business and Labor Law, Tolyatti State University (14 Belorusskaia
St., Togliatti, 445020, Russia; e-mail: elenachuklova@mail.ru)

Recommended citation

Lipinsky D.A., Musatkina A.A., Chuklova E.V. Protsessual’naia otvetstvennost’
i bezotvetstvennost’, protsessual’naia i natsional’naia bezopasnost’: problemy sootnosheniia
i sistemnykh sviazei [Procedural Responsibility and Irresponsibility, Procedural
and National Security: Problems of Relationship and System Communications]. Vestnik
grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 149–
166. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-4-149-166

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

Keywords