Herald of Civil Procedure
RU
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

subscribe bluebook itunes instagram twitter vk youtube fb
library ulrichs-webGoogleСнимок экрана 2015-12-25 в 19.31.28.pngCrossref.pngVAK logo.pngHEIN logo.png

DIRECTION OF THE CASE ON JURISDICTION: PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION AND FEATURES OF PROCEDURAL REGISTRATION

JUDICIAL AUTHORITY AND PRACTICE


D.Yu. VORONIN

D.Yu. VORONIN,
Full State Councilor of the Russian Federation (3rd Class),
Member of the Commission on Legislation and State Construction
of the Association of Lawyers of Russian Federation

https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-3-293-315

The paper presents a research of the new legal regulation for such an institute in relation
to a regional and equal court, as the referral of a case received in accordance with part
4 of Article 39 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation to a court of
general jurisdiction, which is in jurisdiction to hear a case as it is assigned by law. The
absence of procedural legal regulation of this action, which is, in author’s opinion, has an
obvious procedural nature, and researched practice general jurisdiction courts demonstrate
the uncertainty in implementation of the considered reform. The author analyzes the new
procedural institution on the basis of his own vision of a number of procedural norms, as
well as scholar works and historical experience. In particular, the author reasoning that
the courts are to issue special rulings on the referral of cases received from arbitration
to the courts of general jurisdiction. Moreover, the author considers the mechanism for
adopting such a judicial act. The article presents a wide range of practical examples of the
implementation of considered provision, as well as the difference in the approaches of the
appellate courts to assess these implementation practice. In conclusion, the article presents
the proposals for further improvement of the regulation of considered issue. Most likely
such an improvement will be impossible without the universal approach established by the
Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Such improvements should result in uniform
judicial practice, as well as further developments of procedural legislation.

Keywords: jurisdiction; direction of the case by jurisdiction; competence; courts of general
jurisdiction; arbitration courts; disputes about jurisdiction; judge’s powers; effectiveness
of judicial protection.

References

Andreeva T.K., Uletova G.D. Novyi etap sudebnoi reformy: konstitutsionnye vozmozhnostii
vyzovy [New Stage of Judicial Reform: Constitutional Opportunities and Challenges].
Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10, no. 2,
pp. 251–291. (In Russ.)
Bekiasheva D.I. Otkaz zakonodatelia ot termina «podvedomstvennos’», ili Uiazvimye
pravila «novoi» podsudnosti: chto dal’she? [Legislator’s Rejection of the Term “Jurisdiction,”
or Vulnerable Rules of the “New” Jurisdiction: What Next?]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 126–143. (In Russ.)
Bertgoldt G.V. Ustav Grazhdanskogo Sudoproizvodstva po ofitsial’nomu izdaniiu 1914
goda [The Statute of Civil Procedure in Official Edition of 1914]. Moscow: Edition of
the Legal Bookstore “Pravo” by F.V. Busygin, 1915. 108 р. (In Russ.)
Chernovol K.A. Kontseptsiia pravomernykh ozhidanii: evropeiskii i rossiiskii opyt
[The Concept of Legitimate Expectations: European and Russian Experience]. Pravovedenie
– Legal Science, 2019, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 181–191. (In Russ.)
Lesiv B. Realii i potentsial konstitutsionnogo kontrolia nad deistviiami i resheniiami
vlastei: sravnitel’noe issledovanie [Reality and Potential of Behavioral Constitutional
Review: A Comparative Research]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie – Comparative
Constitutional Review, 2020, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 141–170. (In Russ.)
Sakhnova T.V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa [Civil Procedure Course]. 2nd ed. Moscow:
Statut, 2014. 784 p. (In Russ.)
Smagina E.S. Novelly podsudnosti del sudam obshchei iurisdiktsii i arbitrazhnym
sudam [Novels of Jurisdiction of Cases to Courts of General Jurisdiction and Arbitration
Courts]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess – Arbitration and Civil Procedure,
2019, no. 11, pp. 35–41. (In Russ.)
Treushnikov M.K. (ed.). Grazhdanskii protsess: uchebnik [Civil Procedure: Textbook].
5th ed. Moscow: Statut, 2014. 960 p. (In Russ.)
Yarkov V.V. Ob”edinenie vysshikh sudov: ozhidaniia i posledstviia [Unification of Higher
Courts: Expectations and Consequences]. Zakon – Law, 2014, no. 3, pp. 98–106. (In
Russ.)
Yarkov V.V. Razgranichenie predmetov vedeniia mezhdu sudami: kliuchevye novelly
[Delineation of Subjects of Jurisdiction between Courts: Key Novelties]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii
protsess – Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2019, no. 7, pp. 31–37. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

D.Yu. Voronin (Moscow Region, Russia) – Full State Councilor of the Russian Federation
(3rd Class), Member of the Commission on Legislation and State Construction
of the Association of Lawyers of Russian Federation (17 Tsentralnaia St., Shchyolkovo,
141108, Russia; e-mail: voroninmosobsud@yandex.ru).

Recommended citation

Voronin D.Yu. Napravlenie dela po podsudnosti: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniia
i osobennosti protsessual’nogo oformleniia [Direction of the Case on Jurisdiction: Problems
of Legal Regulation and Features of Procedural Registration]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 293–315. (In Russ.)
https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-3-293-315

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

Keywords