main-photo

We in a citing index:

ON THE CONCEPT AND CONTENT OF “ANOTHER ORDER OF PRE-TRIAL SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES, ESTABLISHED BY THE AGREEMENT”

JUDICIAL AUTHORITY AND PRACTICE

D.G. FILCHENKO, E.A. EVTUKHOVICH

D.G. FILCHENKO,

Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Civil Law and Procedure,

Voronezh State University

E.A. EVTUKHOVICH,

Lecturer, Department of Civil Law and Procedure,

Voronezh State University

The article analyzes the provisions of the arbitration procedural legislation and the practice

of its application on a different pre-trial dispute settlement procedure established by the

contract. A different pre-trial procedure is considered as an alternative to the general

claim procedure for resolving disputes. The characteristic features of a different pre-trial

order have been revealed. The authors summarized the practice of arbitration courts,

highlighting other demanded pre-trial dispute settlement procedures. In particular,

examples of atypical other methods of dispute settlement are provided. Separately, the issue

of the admissibility of the cancellation of the general claim procedure for the settlement of

disputes by the agreement was considered. An independent subject of the authors’ analysis

was mediation as a pre-trial dispute settlement procedure. The work also focuses on the

impact of a different pre-trial dispute settlement procedure on the course of the limitation

period. The article discusses the provisions of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme

Court of the Russian Federation of 22 June 2021 No. 18 “On Some Issues of Pre-Trial

Settlement of Disputes Considered in Civil and Arbitration Proceedings”. Some of the

recommendations of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation received

critical assessment. The authors note the existing contradictions in the legislation and

possible ways to overcome them, formulate individual conclusions as a result of studying

the materials of the practice of arbitration courts.

Keywords: pre-trial order; claim; dispute settlement; other pre-trial contractual order;

mediation; negotiations; limitation of actions; going to court; arbitration court.

References

Abova T.E. Norma o svobode dogovora ostaetsia osnovopolagaiushchei dlia vsego

nashego obiazatel’stvennogo prava [The Norm of Freedom of Contract Remains Fundamental

to All Our Law of Obligations]. Vestnik Arbitrazhnogo suda Moskovskogo okruga –

Herald of the Arbitration Court of the Moscow District, 2017, no. 2, pp. 6–20. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

D.G. Filchenko (Voronezh, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,

Department of Civil Law and Procedure, Voronezh State University (1 Universitetskaia

Sq., Voronezh, 394036, Russia; e-mail: d.filchenko@mail.ru).

E.A. Evtukhovich (Voronezh, Russia) – Lecturer, Department of Civil Law and

Procedure, Voronezh State University (1 Universitetskaia Sq., Voronezh, 394036, Russia;

e-mail: egor.vsu.sno@rambler.ru).

Recommended citation

Filchenko D.G., Evtukhovich E.A. K voprosu o poniatii i soderzhanii «inogo poriadka

dosudebnogo uregulirovaniia sporov, ustanovlennogo dogovorom» [On the Concept and

Content of “Another Order of Pre-Trial Settlement of Disputes, Established by the Agreement”].

Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2021, vol. 11, no. 4,

pp. 282–298. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2021-11-4-282-298

Keywords