Herald of Civil Procedure
RU
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

subscribe bluebook itunes twitter vk youtube
library ulrichs-webGoogleСнимок экрана 2015-12-25 в 19.31.28.pngCrossref.pngVAK logo.pngHEIN logo.png

CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY IN CIVIL PROCEDURE

PROBLEMS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE


M.R. ZAGIDULLIN

M.R. ZAGIDULLIN,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Department of Ecological, Labour Law and Civil Procedure,
Kazan (Volga Region) Federal University

Despite the ongoing reforms, today a very large number of procedural violations committed by
participants in the proceedings continues to be observed during the consideration of judicial
disputes, largely due to the inefficiency or insufficiency of the legal liability measures currently
in force. There is also a high degree of inconsistency in law enforcement practice regarding the
application of procedural liability measures for unfair procedural behavior, late or incomplete
presentation of evidence, and delay in the trial. The author also presents the most acute
problems of legal regulation of legal liability and outlines specific proposals to overcome
them. The article presents the thesis that it is characteristic and necessary for the adversarial
model that legal liability is closely interrelated with the model of the adversarial model of
civil proceedings, differing in the degree of development and substantive characteristics of
measures against unfair procedural behavior, proportionality (proportionality) of the size of
punitive liability were proportional to the price of the claim, the active use of legal fictions /
presumptions. It is concluded that it is necessary to develop and scientifically substantiate a new
model of legal responsibility in the entire civil procedure. This model should be based on the
following conceptual foundations: uniform legal regulation of legal liability in the framework of
the entire civil procedure; strengthening of adversarial principles in the implementation of legal
responsibility, including by improving liability measures against unfair procedural behavior,
etc.; the introduction in non-judicial civil jurisdictions of rating systems for evaluating the
activities of bodies and persons engaged in procedural and procedural activities, and the
application of legal liability measures based on them.

Keywords: civil procedure; legal responsibility.

References

Abushenko D.B. Problemy vzaimovliianiia sudebnykh aktov i iuridicheskikh faktov
material’nogo prava v tsivilisticheskom protsesse: avtoref. dis. … dokt. iurid. nauk [Problems
of Mutual Influence of Judicial Acts and Legal Facts of Substantive Law in Civil
Proceedings: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences]. Yekaterinburg,
2014. 29 p. (In Russ.)
Afanasiev S.F. (ed.). Grazhdanskoe protsessual’noe pravo Rossii: uchebnik dlia vuzov
[Civil Procedural Law of Russia: Textbook for High Schools]. Moscow: Iurait, 2014.
879 p. (In Russ.)
Alimova E.Sh. Kompetentsiia suda na stadii ispolnitel’nogo proizvodstva v tsivilisticheskom
protsesse: avtoref. dis. ... kand. iurid. nauk [The Competence of the Court at
the Stage of Enforcement Proceedings in Civil Litigation: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate
Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 2018. 32 ps. (In Russ.)
Chechina N.A. Osnovnye napravleniia razvitiia nauki sovetskogo grazhdanskogo
protsessual’nogo prava [Main Directions of Development of the Science of Soviet Civil
Procedural Law]. St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Publishing House, 1987. 103 p.
(In Russ.)
Chechina N.A. Poniatie grazhdanskoi protsessual’noi otvetstvennosti [The Concept of
Civil Procedural Responsibility]. In XXVI s”ezd KPSS i problemy grazhdanskogo i trudovogo
prava, grazhdanskogo protsessa [The 26th Congress of the Communist Party of the
Soviet Union and Problems of Civil and Labor Law, Civil Procedure]. Moscow: Institute
of State and Law of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR Publishing House, 1982,
pp. 210–212. (In Russ.)
Galperin M.L. K voprosu o grazhdanskom protsessual’nom narushenii [On Civil Procedural
Violations]. Zakonodatel’stvo – Legislation, 2008, no. 5, pp. 80–81. (In Russ.)
Galuzin A.F. Pravonarusheniia v publichnom i chastnom prave: dis. … kand. iurid.
nauk [Torts in Public and Private Law: Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences].
Samara, 1996. 200 p. (In Russ.)
Golubtsov V.G. Sovershenstvovanie pravovogo regulirovaniia otnoshenii v sfere gosudarstvenno-
chastnogo partnerstva na sovremennom etape [Improvement of the Legal
Regulation of Relations in the Sphere of Public-Private Partnership at the Present Stage].
Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Iuridicheskie nauki – Herald of the Perm State University.
Juridical Sciences, 2014, no. 1, pp. 179–188. (In Russ.)
Gribov N.D. Pravovaia priroda apelliatsii v tsivilisticheskom protsesse: avtoref. dis. ...
kand. iurid. nauk [The Legal Nature of Appeal in Civil Procedure: Synopsis of a Thesis
for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 2016. 31 p. (In Russ.)
Iudin A.V. Kategoriia «risk» v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [The Category of
“Risk” in Civil Proceedings]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure,
2014, no. 5, pp. 11–53. (In Russ.)
Malein N.S. Pravonarushenie: poniatie, prichiny, otvetstvennost’ [Offence: Concept,
Causes, Responsibility]. Moscow: Iuridicheskaia literatura, 1985. 192 p. (In Russ.)
Mikhailovskii I.V. Ocherki filosofii prava. T. 1 [Essays on Philosophy of Law. Vol. 1].
Tomsk: Edition of the V.M. Posokhin’s Bookstore, 1914. 632 p. (In Russ.)
Nefediev E.A. Edinstvo grazhdanskogo protsessa [Unity of Civil Procedure]. Kazan:
Imperial University Printing House, 1892. 19 р. (In Russ.)
Ovanesian G.M. Grazhdanskii protsess: vozmozhen li privod dlia eksperta, spetsialista
i perevodchika? [Civil Procedure: Is the Drive for an Expert, Specialist and Interpreter
Possible?]. Iuridicheskii fakt – Legal Fact, 2018, no. 28, pp. 25–30. (In Russ.)
Poliakov A.V. Obshchaia teoriia prava: problemy interpretatsii v kontekste kommunikativnogo
podkhoda: uchebnik [General Theory of Law: Problems of Interpretation
in the Context of the Communicative Approach: Textbook]. 2nd ed. Moscow: Prospekt,
2016. 832 p. (In Russ.)
Reshetnikova I.V. Teoriia protsessual’nogo riska [Procedural Risk Theory]. Zakon –
Law, 2012, no. 6, pp. 117–122. (In Russ.)
Sidorova A.V. Obshcheteoreticheskoe opredelenie poniatiia «pravonarushenie» [General
Theoretical Definition of the Concept of “Offense”]. Iurist – Lawyer, 2018, no. 7,
pp. 71–76. (In Russ.)
Vasilieva T.A. Kosvennyi isk v tsivilisticheskom protsesse: sravnitel’no-pravovoe issledovanie:
avtoref. dis. ... kand. iurid. nauk [Indirect Claim in Civil Procedure: Comparative
Legal Research: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences].
Moscow, 2018. 27 р. (In Russ.)
Vasilkova S.V. Elektronnoe pravosudie v tsivilisticheskom protsesse: dis. … kand. iurid.
nauk [Electronic Justice in Civil Litigation: Thesis for a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences].
Saratov, 2018. 251 p. (In Russ.)
Zhizhina M.V. Teoriia i praktika primeneniia sovremennoi kriminalistiki v tsivilisticheskom
protsesse: avtoref. dis. ... dokt. iurid. nauk [Theory and Practice of Application
of Modern Criminalistics in Civil Proceedings: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Doctor
Degree in Law Sciences]. Moscow, 2017. 47 p. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

M.R. Zagidullin (Kazan, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Department of Ecological, Labour Law and Civil Procedure, Kazan (Volga Region) Federal
University (18 Kremlevskaia St., Kazan, 420008, Russia; e-mail: [email protected]).

Recommended citation

Zagidullin M.R. Kontseptual’nye osnovy iuridicheskoi otvetstvennosti v tsivilisticheskom
protsesse [Conceptual Foundations of Legal Responsibility in Civil Procedure].
Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2022, vol. 12, no. 1,
pp. 107–126. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2022-12-1-107-126

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

Keywords