Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

ARTICLE-BY-ARTICLE COMMENTARY TO THE ARBITRATION PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (CHAPTER 28.1)

CIVIL PROCEDURE ON COMMENT


E.S. RAZDYAKONOV, I.N. TARASOV

E.S. RAZDYAKONOV,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Civil Procedure,
Ural State Law University

I.N. TARASOV,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Civil Procedure,
Ural State Law University

DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-5-134-179

This article is the author’s text of the article-by-article commentary to the Arbitration
Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, which has not been previously published
in the legal literature. It takes into account the latest changes in procedural legislation,
including on the delimitation of jurisdiction over corporate disputes between arbitration
courts and courts of general jurisdiction, conciliation in corporate disputes and their
arbitrability, notifying participants in a corporate dispute about litigation in such a dispute
and determining the procedural status of participants in a corporate dispute. The authors
from the standpoint of the modern doctrine of the civil law process interpret the articles of
Chapter 28.1 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, which regulate
the consideration of cases by arbitration courts on corporate disputes. The content of
the commented norms is revealed in their relationship with other norms of the APC RF,
provisions of other federal laws and current legal positions of the Supreme Arbitration
Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. The
allocation by the legislator of the procedure for considering corporate disputes in a separate
chapter of the APC of the Russian Federation is due to the nature of the disputed material
legal relations and the task of considering such cases using procedural features that make
it possible to better ensure the observance and protection of the rights and legitimate
interests of participants in a corporate dispute. These procedural features are established
by the legislator in terms of determining the competence of arbitration courts to consider
corporate disputes, requirements for a statement of claim (statement) in a corporate dispute,
providing access to information about a corporate dispute, conciliation in a corporate
dispute, application of interim measures, time limits for performing certain procedural
actions, including time limits for appealing judicial acts, composition of court costs, grounds
for imposition and amounts of court fines. These features are disclosed by the authors
during commenting on the relevant provisions of the law.

Keywords: corporate dispute; corporation; arbitrability; arbitration court; arbitration
agreement; reconciliation; settlement agreement; comment.

References

Chugunova E.I. Proizvodnye iski v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse: dis. …
kand. iurid. nauk [Derivative Claims in Civil and Arbitration Procedure: Thesis for
a Candidate Degree in Law Sciences]. Yekaterinburg, 2003. 225 p. (In Russ.)
Dergachev S.A. Osoboe proizvodstvo v korporativnykh sporakh [Special Proceedings
in Corporate Disputes]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess – Arbitration and Civil Procedure,
2019, no. 9, pp. 28–33. (In Russ.)
Gubin E.P. Vazhno ne stavit’ vo glavu ugla pravovye traditsii, a reshat’ ekonomicheskuiu
zadachu [It Is Important Not to Put Legal Traditions at the Fore, but to Solve
an Economic Problem]. Zakon – Law, 2019, no. 3, pp. 8–18. (In Russ.)
Iarkov V.V. (ed.). Arbitrazhnyi protsess: uchebnik [Arbitration Procedure: Textbook].
7th ed. Moscow: Statut, 2017. 752 p. (In Russ.)
Iarkov V.V. (ed.). Kommentarii k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossiiskoi
Federatsii (postateinyi) [Commentary on the Arbitration Procedural Code of the Russian
Federation (Itemized)]. 4th ed. Moscow: Statut, 2020. 1071 p. (In Russ.)
Iarkov V.V. Novelly APK: revoliutaiia v arbitrazhnom protsesse? [Novels of the Agro-
Industrial Complex: A Revolution in Arbitration Procedure?]. Vestnik FAS Ural’skogo
okruga – Herald of the Federal Arbitration Court of the Ural District, 2009, no. 3,
pp. 93–94. (In Russ.)
Iudin A.V. Protsessual’nyi status iuridicheskogo litsa po korporativnomu sporu, rassmatrivaemomu
arbitrazhnym sudom [Procedural Status of a Legal Entity in a Corporate
Dispute Considered by an Arbitration Court]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess –
Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2009, no. 12, pp. 22–24. (In Russ.)
Razdyakonov E.S. Osobennosti iskovoi formy zashchity prav i zakonnykh interesov aktsionerov:
avtoref. dis. … kand. iurid. nauk [Features of the Claim Form for the Protection
of the Rights and Legitimate Interests of Shareholders: Synopsis of a Thesis for a Candidate
Degree in Law Sciences]. Yekaterinburg, 2007. 26 p. (In Russ.)
Razdyakonov E.S. Zakonotvorchestvo i razvitie zakonodatel’stva o grazhdanskom
i administrativnom sudoproizvodstve [Legislation and Development of Legislation on
Civil and Administrative Proceedings]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess – Arbitration
and Civil Procedure, 2018, no. 1, pp. 6–11. (In Russ.)
Razdyakonov E.S. Zloupotreblenie aktsionerami pravom na primenenie obespechitel’nykh
mer: problemy i puti sovershenstvovaniia zakonodatel’stva [Abuse by Shareholders of the
Right to Apply Interim Measures: Problems and Ways to Improve Legislation]. Arbitrazhnyi
i grazhdanskii protsess – Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2008, no. 10, pp. 32–36.
(In Russ.)
Razdyakonov E.S., Tarasov I.N. Aktual’nye problemy proizvodstva po delam o vydache
ispolnitel’nogo lista na prinuditel’noe ispolnenie resheniia treteiskogo suda [Actual Problems
of Proceedings on the Issue of a Writ of Execution for the Compulsory Execution
of a Decision of an Arbitration Court]. Rossiiskii iuridicheskii zhurnal – Russian Legal
Journal, 2017, no. 5(116), pp. 157–162. (In Russ.)
Slepchenko E.V. Grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo: problemy edinstva i differentsiatsii:
avtoref. dis. … dokt. iurid. nauk [Civil Justice: Problems of Unity and Differentiation:
Synopsis of a Thesis for a Doctor Degree in Law Sciences]. St. Petersburg, 2011.
29 p. (In Russ.)

Information about the author

E.S. Razdyakonov (Yekaterinburg, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate
Professor, Department of Civil Procedure, Ural State Law University (21 Komsomolskaia
St., Yekaterinburg, 620137, Russia; e-mail: igor.oursoff@gmail.com).

I.N. Tarasov (Yekaterinburg, Russia) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor,
Department of Civil Procedure, Ural State Law University (21 Komsomolskaia
St., Yekaterinburg, 620137, Russia; e-mail: igor.oursoff@gmail.com).

Recommended citation

Razdyakonov E.S., Tarasov I.N. Postateinyi kommentarii k Arbitrazhnomu protsessual’nomu
kodeksu Rossiiskoi Federatsii (gl. 28.1) [Article-by-Article Commentary to the
Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (Chapter 28.1)]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo
protsessa – Herald of Civil Procedure, 2020, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 134–179. (In
Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24031/2226-0781-2020-10-5-134-179

el_.png   it_.png   book.png

Keywords