Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

Dissenting Opinion of a Judge in Civil Procedure

A.A. Mokhov,
Doctor of Legal Sciences,
Professor at the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)

DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2017-7-2-47-55

The article attempts to identify the most significant characteristics and features of the institute of dissenting opinion of a judge in civil procedure. Current rules of procedural codes about dissenting opinion of a judge are often criticized in special literature. The author considers that understanding of main defects of procedural regulation of dissenting opinion of a judge may be done only after understanding the concept and essence of the institute and finding out its place in the system of procedural norms. There is an interest for both theory and practice about legal (procedural) consequences of administration of dissenting opinion of a judge; an occurrence of dissenting opinion of a judge creates additional motivation for parties or other participants of the procedure to realize their right to appeal against court decision. The author also notes that the institute of the dissenting opinion of a judge is developed quite uniformly in Russia and several other countries: from the utter disregard to recognition as one of typical institution of developed civil procedure.
The conclusion about further development of the institute and improvement of procedural legislation and necessity of that is made.

Keywords: civil procedure; dissenting opinion of a judge; issues; perfection of norms of procedural law on dissenting opinion of a judge.

References 

Alyabyshev M.S. Osoboe mnenie sud’i – pora stavit’ tochku [Dissenting Opinion of a Judge: It is Time to Drop the Curtain]. Rossijskij sud’ya = Russian Judge, 2016, no. 2. (In Russian) 
Boldyreva N.N. Osoboe mnenie sud’i v grazhdanskom protsesse [Dissenting Opinion of a Judge in Civil Procedure]. Elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Electronic Scientific Journal of the Kursk State University, 2014, no. 2. (In Russian) 
Bykov V.M., Manova N.S. O prave sud’i na osoboe mnenie: prodolzhenie temy [On the Right of a Judge for Dissenting Opinion: Continuation of the Topic]. Rossijskij sud’ya = Russian Judge, 2016, no. 3. (In Russian) 
Gavrilov E. Ob osobom mnenii sud’i [On Dissenting Opinion of a Judge]. Hozyajstvo i pravo = Economy and Law, 2015, no. 4. (In Russian) 
Kachkov V.G. Institut osobogo mneniya sud’i v SShA i Bel’gii: argumenty «za» i «protiv » [Institute of Dissenting Opinion of a Judge in the USA and Belgium: Arguments «For and Against»]. Elektronnyj nauchno-prakticheskij zhurnal «Gumanitarnye nauchnye issledovaniya» = Electronic Scientific and Practical Journal «Academic Researches», 2016, no. 2. (In Russian) 
Kononov A.L. Pravo na osoboe mnenie [Right for Dissenting Opinion]. Zakon = Law, 2006, no. 11. (In Russian) 
Krapivkina O.A. Priroda instituta osobogo mneniya sud’i v razlichnyh pravovyh sistemah [Nature of the Institute of Dissenting Opinion of a Judge in Different Legal Systems]. Vestnik IrGTU = Herald of the Irkutsk National Research Technical University, 2015, no. 2. (In Russian) 
Martynchik E.G. Osoboe mnenie sud’i po ugolovnomu delu [Dissenting Opinion of a Judge on the Criminal Case]. Kishinev, 1981. (In Russian) 
Shevyrdyaeva L.N. Yazyk sovremennogo amerikanskogo sudebnogo diskursa [Language of Contemporary American Judicial Discourse]: Dissertation … Candidate of Legal Sciences. Moscow, 2010. (In Russian) 
Ulturgashev P. Osobye mneniya sudej v sravnitel’no-pravovom kontekste [Dissenting Opinions of Judges in Comparative Context]. Sravnitel’noe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie = Comparative Constitutional Review, 2013, no. 6. (In Russian) 
Veretennikova I.P. Institut osobogo mneniya v arbitrazhnom protsesse [Institute of Dissenting Opinion of a Judge in Arbitration Procedure]. Pravovaya initsiativa = Legal Initiative, 2012, no. 5. (In Russian)
 
Information about the author 

Mokhov A.A. (Moscow, Russia) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor at the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL) (123995, Moscow, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya St., 9; e-mail: [email protected]). 

Recommended citation 

Mokhov A.A. Osoboe mnenie sud’i v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Dissenting Opinion of a Judge in Civil Procedure]. Вестник гражданского процесса = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2017, no. 2, p. 47–55 . (In Russian) DOI: 10.24031/2226-0781-2017-7-2-47-55

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png



A.A. Mokhov