A.T. Bonner, 

Honored Worker of Science of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Legal Sciences, 

Professor of the Department of Civil and Administrative Proceedings of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL) 

The article is devoted to problems of allocation of administrative proceedings. The author notes that estimates of the «newborn» on the part of representatives of science of civil procedure law, to put it mildly, more than restrained. And representatives of the science of administrative law due to the adoption and entry into force of the Administrative Procedure Code of the Russian Federation are in a state of euphoria. We can agree that at this stage of development of the Russian legislation it is hardly reasonable to raise the question on that the Administrative Procedure Code of the Russian Federation should be abandoned, say, cancel it in accordance with the law. No doubt, this question is not quite realistic. In addition, because of many reasons and not least the mentality of Russian citizens, disputes of a public law nature comes to the consideration of domestic courts are relatively few. In principle it is possible to agree with the appearance of terms such as «administrative action», «administrative claimant» and «administrative party» in the Administrative Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, although some colleagues those terms don’t like. It is clear that these terms are intended to distinguish the claim of a public law nature from a civil lawsuit, although terms «claim» and «claimant» and «defendant» conform to refer to these concepts. But this is not the main thing. Given terms are intended to emphasize that in such cases there is a dispute about the law, and this argument carries publicly-legal character. Accordingly, the parties to the dispute have administrative authority to accept the claim, reject the claim etc. 

Keywords: administrative procedure; civil procedure; Administrative Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. 

References 

Starilov Ju.N. Kodeks administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva Rossijskoj Federatsii: znachenie dlya sudebnoi i administrativnoi praktiki i problemy organizatsii prepodavaniya uchebnogo kursa [Administrative Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: Implications for the Judicial and Administrative Practice and Problems of Organizing the Teaching of the Course]. Administrativnoe pravo i process = Administrative Law and Procedure, 2015, no. 7. (In Russian) 

Starilov Yu.N. Administrativnaya yustitsiya: istoricheskie korni i noveishee razvitie instituta administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva. Vstupitel’naya stat’ya k Hrestomatii «Administrativnaya yustitsiya. Konets XIX – nachalo XX veka». Ch. I [Administrative Justice: Historical Roots and Modern Development of the Institute of Administrative Procedure. Preface to the Anthology «Administrative Justice. The End of XIX – Early XX Century». Part I]. Voronezh, 2004. (In Russian)

Bobrova I. Mest’ po zakonam rynka [Revenge on the Market’s Laws]. Moskovskij komsomolets = Moskovsky Komsomolets, 2016, April 26. (In Russian)

Marks K., Engels F. Sochineniya. T. 1 [Works. Vol. 1]. 2nd ed. (In Russian). 

Nedbailo P.E., Gorshenev V.M. (eds.). Yuridicheskaya protsessual’naya forma. Teoriya i praktika [Legal Procedural Form. Theory and Practice]. M., 1976. (In Russian) 

Gorshenev V.M. Sposoby i organizatsionnye formy pravovogo regulirovaniya v sotsialisticheskom obshchestve [Methods and Organizational Forms of Legal Regulation in a Socialist Society]. M., 1972. (In Russian) 

Krasnov N.I., Ikonitskaya I.A. Protsessual’nye voprosy sovetskogo zemel’nogo prava [Procedural Issues of Soviet Land Law]. M., 1975. (In Russian) 

Sorokin V.D. Problemy administrativnogo protsessa [Problems of Administrative Procedure]. M., 1968. (In Russian) 

Akopova E.M. O ponyatii trudovogo protsessa [On the Concept of the Labor Procedure] in Problemy trudovogo prava i prava sotsial’nogo obespecheniya [Issues of Labor Law and Social Security Law]. M., 1975. (In Russian) 

Sahnova T.V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa [Course of Civil Procedure]. M., 2014. (In Russian) 

Bonner A.T. K. Marks o sootnoshenii material’nogo prava i protsessa [K. Marx on the Correlation Between Substantive Law and Procedural Law]. Pravovedenie = Jurisprudence, 1978, no. 4. (In Russian) 

Zhuikov V.M., Treushnikov M.K. (eds.). Kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoi Federatsii [Comment to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. M., 2010. (In Russian) 

Korf S.A. Administrativnaya yustitsiya v Rossii. Kniga vtoraya. Ocherk deistvuyushchego zakonodatel’stva [Administrative Justice in Russia. Book Two. Outline Current Legislation]. St. Petersburg, 1910 (In Russian) 

Nechaev V.I. (ed.). Kommentarij k Grazhdanskomu protsessual’nomu kodeksu Rossijskoi Federatsii [Comment to the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. 3rd ed. M., 2008. (In Russian). 

Boguslavskaya O. Bol’she chem lyubov’. Semnadtsat’ let Svetlana ezdila v koloniyu k lyubimomu, chtoby posle osvobozhdeniya prozhit’ s nim tri mesyatsa [More Than Love. Svetlana Went to the Colony for a Loved One for Seventeen Years, to Live After Release Him Three Months]. Moskovskij komsomolets = Moskovsky Komsomolets, 2016, April 6. (In Russian) 

Bonner A.T. Proizvodstvo po delam, voznikayushchim iz administrativno-pravovyh otnoshenij [Proceedings Arising Out of Administrative Legal Relations]: Dissertation ... Candidate of Legal Sciences. M., 1966. (In Russian) 

Information about the author 

Bonner A.T. (Moscow) – Honored Worker of Science of the Russian Federation, Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department of Civil and Administrative Proceedings of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL) (125993, Russia, Moscow, Sadovaya-Kudrinskaya str., 9; e-mail: [email protected]).