We in a citing index:
Proxyship as a Kind of Free Legal Aid in Civil Procedure
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Senior Lecturer of the Department of
Civil Procedure of the Ural State Law University
The article describes proxyship at the court, provided under the state system of free legal aid; it analyzes the structure of legal facts which are necessary for the genesis of such proxyship, and determines the place of this kind of proxyship in the classification for reasons of genesis. It also covers restrictions on the realization of the right to free legal aid in the form of proxyship established by the applicable procedural legislation and the Federal Law «On Free Legal Aid in the Russian Federation»; it describes the author’s position on existing restrictions, its correlation with the practice of the European Court of Human Rights, the highest judicial courts of the Russian Federation. If we consider grounds for the emergence of proxyship under a system of free legal aid, we can say that there is definitely a legal basis. Legislation must contain clear and understandable criteria under which a person is entitled to apply for appropriate aid. From these positions such proxyship close to legitimate, as in cases established by the law a person is entitled to use the appropriate form of legal assistance. However, only indication of the law on the availability of appropriate opportunities for the person in and of itself does not lead to the emergence of proxyship. A person is entitled, but not obliged to have the assistance of a proxy, and may participate in the proceedings independently. At the same time, legal proxyship is characterized by the complete replacement the represented party by his proxy, accordingly, such person cannot act in the process on their own. The article proposes mechanism of compensation of state expenses for free legal aid in the form of proxyship.
Keywords: proxyship; proxyship by appointment; free legal aid; access to justice; right to a fair trial.
Bernam U., Reshetnikova I.V., Yarkov V.V. Sudebnaya reforma: problemy grazhdanskoi yurisdiktsii [Judicial Reform: Problems of Civil Jurisdiction]. Ekaterinburg, 1996. (In Russian)
Besplatnaya yuridicheskaya pomoshch’: model’ vzaimodeistviya gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva (zarubezhnij i rossiiskij opyt): Sbornik dokladov [Free Legal Aid: A Model of Interaction Between Government and Civil Society (Foreign and Russian Experience): Collection of Reports]. M., 2011. (In Russian)
Bortnikova N.A. Predstavitel’stvo po naznacheniyu suda v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Proxyship by the Court Appointment in Civil Proceedings]: Dissertation … Candidate of Legal Sciences. Saratov, 2011. (In Russian)
Cappelletti M. Access to Justice and the Welfare State. Firenze, 1979.
Cappelletti M., Gordley J. and Johnson E. Jr. Toward Equal Justice: A Comparative Study of Legal Aid in Modern Societies (Texts and Materials). (Studies in Comparative Law, No. 13.) Milan: Dott. A. Giuffré Editore; Dobbs Ferry, 1975.
Open Society Justice Initiative and the Public Interest Law Institute. European Court of Human Rights Jurisprudence on the Right to Legal Aid in Making Legal Aid a Reality. Budapest, 2009.
Korshunov M.N. (ed.). Grazhdanskij protsess: Uchebnik [Civil Procedure: A Textbook]. M., 2005. (In Russian)
Yarkov V.V. (ed.). Grazhdanskii protsess: Uchebnik [Civil Procedure: A Textbook]. 8th ed. M., 2012. (In Russian)
Treushnikov M.K. (ed.). Grazhdanskii protsess: Uchebnik [Civil Procedure: A Textbook]. 2nd ed. M., 2007. (In Russian)
Yakovlev V.F. Ot reformirovaniya k sovershenstvovaniyu sudebno-arbitrazhnoi sistemy, ukrepleniyu nezavisimosti sudebnoi vlasti [From Reforming to Improving the Judicial and Arbitration System, Strengthen the Independence of the Judiciary]. Vestnik VAS RF = Bulletin of the Supreme Arbitration Court of Russian Federation, 1998, no. 4. (In Russian)
Yarkov V.V. Yuridicheskie fakty v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Legal Facts in Civil Procedure]. M., 2012. (In Russian)
Khalatov S.A. Predstavitel’stvo v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Proxyship in Civil and Arbitration Procedure]. M., 2002. (In Russian)
Khaleppo E.M. Pravovoe polozhenie advokata kak uchastnika grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessa v Rossijskoi Federatsii [Legal Status of a Lawyer as a Party of Civil and Arbitration Procedure in the Russian Federation]: Dissertation … Candidate of Legal Sciences. M., 2012. (In Russian)
Kleinman A.F. Sovetskij grazhdanskij protsess [Soviet Civil Procedure]. M., 1954. (In Russian)
Barendrecht M. Legal Aid, Accessible Courts or Legal Information? Three Access to Justice Strategies Compared. Global Jurist, 2011, vol. 11, no. 1. Mel’nichenko R.G. Pravo na yuridicheskuyu pomoshch’: konstitutsionnye aspekty: Monografiya [Right to Legal Aid: Constitutional Aspects: Monography]. Volgograd, 2003. (In Russian)
Nazarova M.V. Obespechenie prava na kvalifitsirovannuyu yuridicheskuyu pomoshch’ v arbitrazhnom protsesse [Ensuring the Right to Qualified Legal Aid in Arbitration Procedure]: Dissertation … Candidate of Legal Sciences. M., 2013. (In Russian)
Prikhod’ko I.A. Dostupnost’ pravosudiya v arbitrazhnom i grazhdanskom protsesse: osnovnye problemy [Access to Justice in Arbitration and Civil Procedure: Basic Problems]. St. Petersburg, 2005. (In Russian)
Information about the author
Sheremetova G.S. (Yekaterinburg) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Ural State Law University (620137, Yekaterinburg, Komsomolskaya st., 404 room; e-mail: email@example.com).