We in a citing index:
Dissenting Opinion of Judge
DISSENTING OPINION OF JUDGE
Yu.V. TAI,
Managing Partner of Lawyer Bureau “Bartolius”, Candidate of Legal Sciences,
Associate Professor of the Department of Private International and Civil Law
of Moscow State Institute of International Relations
The article is devoted to the special opinion of judges in civil, arbitration and constitutional procedure. Acquaintance with the dissenting opinion takes place through the realization of the right to familiarization with the case materials, it is also possible to copy results of a special opinion. History of regulation of dissenting opinions in the national civil procedure legislation was on the way from their inaccessibility to society to a gradual openness. And, as now, the availability of dissenting opinions were determined by the judicial practice, not a legislator. Of the procedural laws, it follows that a dissenting opinion is a document that has a procedural regulation, that is, a particular judicial opinion should not be considered just a doctrinal proposition, which can be expressed in verbal speech, article or monograph. Procedural laws apply to a judicial act such requirements as the legality, validity, requirements for the contents of a judicial act. Nothing like for a dissenting opinion is not established.
Keywords: dissenting opinion of judge; civil procedure; arbitration procedure; constitutional procedure.
References
Baum L. Motivatsija I povedenie sudej: rasshirenie granits issledovanija. Per. A.V. Dmitrijeva. [Motivation and judicial behaviour: expanding the boundaries of research. Transl. by A.V. Dmitriyev]. Pravoipravoprimenenije v zerkale sotsialnykh nauk: khrestomatija sovremennykh tekstov = Law and law enforcement through the mirror of social science: anthology of contemporary texts. Moscow, 2014. P. 352–372. (In Russian).
Basangov D.A. Juridicheskaja priroda osobogo mnenija sudji Konstitutsionnogo suda Rossijskoi Federatsiji [Legal nature of the dissenting opinion of the judge of Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal on Russian Law. 2006. No. 2. (In Russian).
Borovikovsky A.L. Ustav grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva s objasnenijam i po reshenijam Grazhdanskogo Kassatsionnogo Departamenta Pravitel’stvujushchego Senata [Charter of civil procedure, with explanations on the decisions of the Civil Cassation Department of the Governing Senate] 4th issue. St. Petersburg, 1886. (In Russian).
Gadzhiev G.A. Publikatsija osobogo mnenija sudji, ili Istorija normy, kotoraja javljaetsja kamertonom sudebnoj reformy v Rossiji [Publication of the dissenting opinion of the judge, or the History of a norm which is the tuning fork of the judicial reform in Russia]. Zakonodatelstvo i praktika mass-media = Legislation and practice of mass media. 2005. No. 12. (In Russian).
Gurvich M.A. Reshenie sovetskogo suda v iskovom proizvodstve [The decision of the Soviet court in the action proceedings]. Moscow, 1955. P. 128. (In Russian).
Gurvich M.A. Sudebnoe reshenie. [Decision of a court]. Moscow, 1976. (In Russian).
Djachenko E.B., Myslivskij P.P., Neshataeva T.N. Evrazijskaja integracija: rol’ Suda. [Eurasian integration: the role of the Court]. Ed. T.N. Neshataeva. Moscow, 2015. P. 219. (In Russian).
Krapivkina O.A. Lingvisticheskij status subjekta v juridicheskom diskurse (na material anglijskogo i russkogo jazykov) [The linguistic status of the subject in thelegal discourse(based on the English and Russian languages)]. Thesis Diss. Candidate of philological sciences. Irkutsk. 2011. P. 17. (In Russian).
Kononov A.L. Pravo na osoboe mnenie [The right to dissenting opinion]. Zakon = Law. 2006. No. 11. (In Russian).
Malyshev K. Kurs grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Course of Civil Proceedings]. Vol. 1. St. Petersburg, 1876. P. 413. (In Russian). Martynchik E.G. Osoboje mnenie sudji po ugolovnomu delu [Dissenting judicial opinion in a criminal case]. Kishinev. 1981. P. 89. (In Russian).
Malinin M.I. Ubezhdenije sudji v grazhdanskom protsesse. V proizvodstve do sudebnogo zasedanija [Judge’s conviction in the civil procedure. In the proceedings before the hearing]. Trudi po grazhdanskomu protsessu = Works on civil procedure. Moscow. 2014. P. 55. (In Russian).
Rozhkova M.A. Osoboje mnenie sudji arbitrazhnogo suda [Dissenting opinion of the arbitration court judge]. Vestnik VAS RF = Herald of the Supreme Arbitrazh Court of the Russian Federation. 2008. No. 3. (In Russian).
Tai Yu. Priplod protsessual’nykh suschnostei [The offspring of procedural essences]. Novaya advokatskay agazeta = New advocate’s newspaper. 2015. No. 18. (In Russian).
Tyutryumov I.M. Ustav grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva s zakomodatel’nymi motivami, razjasnenijami Pravitel’svujushchego Senata I kommentarijami russkikh juristov, izvlechennymi iz nauchnykh I prakticheskikh trudov po grazhdanskomy pravu I sudoproizvodstvu (po 1 sentjabrja 1909 goda) [Charter of civil procedure, with legislative motives, clarifications from the Governing Senate and comments of Russian lawyers extracted from the researches on civil law and civil proceeding (till September 1, 1909)]. 2nd ed. St. Petersburg, 1910. (In Russian).
Ulturgashev P.Yu. Osobije mnenija sudej v sravnitel’no-pravovom aspekte [Dissenting judicial opinions in a comparative law context]. Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie = Comparative constitutional review. 2013. No. 6. P. 75–87. (In Russian).
Ustav grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva s pozdnejshimi uzakonenijami, zakonodatel’nymi motivami i raz’jasnenijami [Charter of Civil Procedure with later legislation, regulatory motives and clarifications]. Comp. by Rotenberg L.M., ed. by Gal’perin S.I. 3rd ed. St. Petersburg, 1903. (In Russian).
Vereshchagin A.N. Osobojemnenie v rossijskih sudah [Dissenting opinion in the Russian courts]. Sravnitelnoe konstitutsionnoe obozrenie = Comparative constitutional review. 2006. No. 4. P. 165–168. (In Russian).
Information about the author:
Tay Yu.V. (Moscow) – Managing Partner of Law Bureau “Bartolius”, Candidate of Legal sciences, Associate Professor of Private International and Civil Law, Moscow State Institute of International Relations (119454, Moscow, Vernadskogo Avenue, 76; e-mail: [email protected]).
Yu.V. Tai
Advertisement
Our partners
