Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

Actual Paradigms of Civil Procedure

T.V. Sakhnova, 
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Civil Procedure 
of the Siberian Federal University 

The article is devoted to topical problems of the paradigm of civil procedure. The author notes that it is necessary to state the lack of a common understanding in the modern doctrine of the actual paradigm of civil procedure in general and in relation to its individual components. The problem of defining the paradigm – not a speculative but necessary action-oriented task, predetermining a legislative definition of objectives and methodology of procedure and its regulatory model. Do we follow the continental tradition (and in what form; whether inherit the pre-revolutionary Russian tradition in its development) or try to «englishrelated» procedure? Currently we are «inside» the process of return of the historically developed paradigm actio-ius – at a new evolutionary stage of development of civil procedure. And it is able to perform the purposeful and methodological function in future development of civil procedure, taking into account its new location – forming system in the national legal system and legal inter-ethnic communication.

Keywords: paradigm of civil procedure; trends of development of civil proceedings.

References 

Sakhnova T.V. Dostizhimo li edinstvo tsivilisticheskogo protsessa? (v kontekste kontseptsii edinogo GPK RF i Kodeksa administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva) [Is It Possible to Reach the Unity of Civil Procedure? (In the Context of the Concept of the Unified Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the Code of Administrative Procedure)]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2015, no. 4. (In Russian) 
Andrews N. Fundamental Principles of Civil Procedure: Order Out of Chaos. In Kramer X.E., van Rhee C.H. (eds.). Civil Ligitation in a Globalising World. The Hague, 2012. 
Windscheid B. Die Actio des Romischen Civilrechts vom Standpunkt des Heutigen Rechts. Dusseldorf, 1856. 
Regelsberger F. Pandekten. Leipzig, 1893. Abt. 1, Т. 7, pp. 212–218. 
Berlin, 1925; Springer, 2013, pp. 42–47 ff., 78, 210. 
Baron Iu. Sistema rimskago grazhdanskago prava. Tret’e izdanie. Vypusk pervyi. Kniga I. Obshchaia chast’ [System of Roman Civil Law. Third Edition. Issue First. Book I. General Part]. St. Petersburg, 1909, pp. 184–186. (In Russian) 
Kaser M. Das altromische ius. Studien zur Rechtsvjrstellung und Rechtsgeschichte der Romer. Gottingen, 1949. 
Romische Rechtsgeschichte. Gottingen, 1950. 
Romisches Privatrecht. Munchen, 1960. 
Savigny F.K. System des Heutigen Romischen Rechts. Berlin, 1840, bd. V, § 204, 205. 
Gordon V.M. Osnovanie iska v sostave izmeneniya iskovykh trebovanii [Ground for Action as Part of Changes in Claims under the Lawsuit]. Iaroslavl’, 1902, pp. 36–38. (In Russian) 
Puchta G.F. Pandekten. 1 & 2 Auflage. Leipzig, 1832–1844, § 81. 
Plosz A. Beitrage zur Theorie des Klagerechts. Leipzig, 1880. 
Gurvich M.A. Pravo na isk [Right of Action]. Moscow, 1949, p. 65. (In Russian) 
Prutting H., Wesser S. Die Erledigung des Rechtsstrets: nicht nur ein Kostenproblem. ZZP, 2003, vol. 116. 
Hasse J.C. Uber das Wesen der Actio, ihre Stellung im System des Privatrechts und uber das Gegensatz der in personam und in rem actio. In Reinishes Museum fur Jurisprudez. Jg. 1. 1827 – Bd. 6. 1834, § 5, pp. 154–205. 
Muhter Th. Zur Lehre von der Romischen Actio dem Heutigen Klagerechts der Litiscontestation und der Singularsuccession in Obligationen. Eine Kritik des Windsched’schen Buchs «Die Actio des Romischen Civilrechts vom Standpunkt des Heutigen Rechts». Erlangen, 1857. 
Gordon V.M. Iski o priznanii [Actions for Recognition]. Yaroslavl’, 1906, part 3, § 1. (In Russian) 
Kleinman A.F. Osnovnye voprosy ucheniia ob iske v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsessual’nom prave [Basic Questions of the Lawsuit Doctrine in Soviet Civil Procedural Law]. Moscow, 1959. (In Russian) 
Dobrovol’skii A.A. Iskovaia forma zashchity prava [Lawsuit Form of Protection of Rights]. Moscow, 1965. (In Russian) 
Garsia Garrido M.Kh. Rimskoe chastnoe pravo: kazusy, iski, instituty [Roman Private Law: Incidents, Claims, Institutions]. Moscow, 2005, p. 176. (In Russian) 
Lebedev V.M., Khabrieva T.Ia. (eds.). Pravosudie v sovremennom mire [Justice in the Modern World]. Moscow, 2012. (In Russian) Barak A. Sudeiskoe usmotrenie [Judicial Discretion]. Moscow, 1999. (In Russian) 
Papkova O.A. Usmotrenie suda [Judicial Discretion]. Moscow, 2005. (In Russian) 
Abushenko D.B. Sudebnoe usmotrenie v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Judicial Discretion in Civil and Arbitration Procedure]. Moscow, 2002. (In Russian) 
Kross R. Pretsedent v angliiskom prave [Precedent in English Law]. Moscow, 1985. (In Russian) 
Storme M. (ed.). Procedural Laws in Europe. Towards Harmonisation. Antwerpen, 2003. 
Fouchard P. Vers un Proces Civil Universel? Les Regles Transnationales de Procedure Civile de l’American Law Institute. Pantheon-Assas, Paris I, 2001. 
Kronke H. (ed.). Special Issue of the Uniform Law Review. 2002, vol. VI. 
Cappelletti M. Access to Justice. Milano, 1978–1979. 
Garth B., Weisner J., Koch K.-F. Access to Justice by Mauro Cappelletti. Harward Law Review, 1981, vol. 94, no. 8. 
Sakhnova T.V. Tsivilisticheskii protsess: missiia v meniaiushchemsia mire [Civil Procedure: the Mission in a Changing World]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2013, no. 1. (In Russian) 
Sakhnova T.V. Pravo na sudebnuyu zashchitu kak substantivnoe protsessual’noe pravo [Right to Judicial Protection as the Substantive Procedural Right]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2014, no. 3. (In Russian) 

Information about the author: 

Sakhnova T.V. (Krasnoyarsk) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Siberian Federal University (660075, Krasnoyarsk, Maerchaka st., 6, room 3-09A; e-mail: civil.law.process@gmail.com).

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png

T.V. Sakhnova