V.B. Nemtseva, 

Senior Lecturer of the Department of Civil and Arbitration Procedure 

of the Omsk F.M. Dostoevsky State University 

The article is devoted to determination of the order of consideration of requirements of individuals and organizations associated with the implementation of judicial control of administrative acts. The error in determination the type of proceedings before the adoption of the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation could not in itself lead to abolition of the judicial decision, because litigation from public relations is still viewed as a form of civil proceedings. At the present time consequences of incorrect determination of the type of legal proceedings are different. According to paragraph 1 of Part 1 of Article 128 of the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation the court refuses to accept the application, if the application is not subject to consideration in the administrative proceedings, and should be considered in another court, including civil proceedings. Similar provisions are contained in paragraph 1 of Part 1 of Article 134 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation: the court refuses to accept the claim, if the claim is not subject to consideration in civil proceedings, as it is seen in other legal process.

References

Gabov A.V., Ganicheva E.S. and oth. Kontseptsiia edinogo grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo kodeksa: predlozheniia instituta zakonodatel’stva i sravnitel’nogo pravovedeniia pri pravitel’stve RF [Concept of the Unified Civil Procedure Code: Proposals of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation]. Zhurnal rossiiskogo prava = Journal of Russian Law, 2015, no. 5. (In Russian)

Bonner A.T. Proizvodstvo po delam, voznikaiushchim iz publichnykh pravootnoshenii, v GPK i APK RF [Proceedings Arising Out of Public Relations in the Civil ProcedureCode of the Russian Federation and the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. In Bonner A.T. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu protsessu [Selected Works on Civil Procedure]. St. Petersburg, 2005, pp. 931–932. (In Russian)

Bonner A.T., Kvitkin V.T. Sudebnyi kontrol’ v oblasti gosudarstvennogo upravleniia [Judicial Review in the Field of Public Administration]. Moscow, 1973, pp. 24–25. (In Russian)

Luparev E.B., Dobrobaba M.B., Mokina T.V. Obshchaia teoriia publichnykh pravootnoshenii [General Theory of Public Relations]. Moscow, 2011, pp. 35, 37–47. (In Russian)

Trofimova I. Bezdeistvie gosudarstvennykh organov i spory s nimi po etim voprosam [Inaction of State Bodies and Disputes with Them on These Issues]. Administrativnoe pravo = Administrative Law, 2015, no. 3, pp. 81–85. (In Russian)

Sultanov A.R. O vozmozhnoi nekonstitutsionnosti ustanovleniia trekhmesiachnogo sroka dlia osparivaniia aktov gosudarstvennogo organa, organa mestnogo samoupravleniia, ikh dolzhnostnykh lits, ogranichivaiushchikh prava i svobody grazhdan i iuridicheskikh lits (abz. 1 ch. 3 st. 263 GPK Kyrgyzskoi Respubliki) [On the Possible Establishment of the Constitutionality of the Three-month Period for Challenging Acts of State Authority, Local Self-government, Their Officials, Restricting Rights and Freedoms of Citizens and Legal Persons (Para. 1 Hr. 3 of Art. 263 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Kyrgyz Republic)]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2014, no. 3, pp. 76–87. (In Russian)

Baulin O.V. Bremia dokazyvaniia pri razbiratel’stve grazhdanskikh del [Burden of Proof at Trial of Civil Cases]: Dissertation ... Doctor of Legal Sciences. Moscow, 2005, pp. 331, 338. (In Russian)

Information about the author:

Nemtseva V.B. (Omsk) – Senior Lecturer of the Department of Civil and Arbitration Procedure of the Omsk F.M. Dostoevsky State University (644065, Omsk, 50 Let Profsoyuzov, 100/1 st.; e-mail: [email protected]).