V.M. Sherstyuk, 

Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department 

of Civil Procedure of the Faculty of Law of the Lomonosov Moscow State University 

The article examines various forms of transition of procedural rules and structural units of civil procedural law in new legal communities. The science of civil procedural law cannot fail to wonder how this development occurs, are there any qualitative changes in the field of law, its divisions, are there new qualitative formations, what is the mechanism of emergence of new qualities. In relation to civil procedural law the category «quantity» can be considered as a set of certain homogeneous structural units of the branch of law that can be divided in kind on homogeneous elements and assembled together. If necessary, they can be counted. Each structural separation of civil procedural law has its uniform quantitative composition: institutions – a certain number of uniform legal norms, associations of institutions – a certain set of homogeneous institutions, sub-branches – a certain number of uniform associations, institutes, branches – several homogeneous sub-branches. 

Keywords: quality; quantity; measure; jump; branch of law; institution; procedural rule.

References

Alekseev P.V., Panin A.V. Filosofiia: Uchebnik [Philosophy: A Textbook]. Moscow, 2015, p. 564. (In Russian)

Spirkin A.G. Kurs marksistkoi filosofii [The Course of Marxist Philosophy]. Moscow, 1966, p. 138. (In Russian)

Frolov I.T. (ed.). Filosofskii slovar’ [Philosophical Dictionary]. Moscow, 2001, p. 240. (In Russian)

Prokhorov A.M. (ed.). Bol’shaia Sovetskaia Entsiklopediia. V 30 t. [Great Soviet Encyclopedia. In 30 vol.]. Moscow, 1974, vol. 16, p. 84. (In Russian)

Alekseev S.S. Sobranie sochinenii. V 10 t. T. 2: Spetsial’nye voprosy pravovedeniia [Collected Works. In 10 vol. Vol. 2: Special Issues of Law]. Moscow, 2010, p. 41. (In Russian)

Borisova E.A. Apelliatsiia v grazhdanskom (arbitrazhnom) protsesse [Appeals in Civil (Arbitration) Procedure]. Moscow, 2008. (In Russian)

Sherstуuk V.M. Novye polozheniia tret’ego Arbitrazhnogo protsessual’nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii [New Provisions of the Third Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, 2003, p. 100–108. (In Russian)

Marks K., Engel’s F. Sochineniya [Works]. Moscow, 1961, vol. 20, p. 586. (In Russian)

Sherstуuk V.M. Sovremennye problemy grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo sudoproizvodstva: Sbornik statei [Modern Problems of Civil and Arbitration Proceedings: Collection of Articles]. Moscow, 2015, p. 78–79. (In Russian)

Krasheninnikov P.V. (int. word). Kontseptsiia edinogo Grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo kodeksa Rossiiskoi Federatsii [The Concept of the Unified Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, 2015, p. 15. (In Russian)

Nosyreva E.I., Fil’chenko D.G. Osnovnye polozheniia Kontseptsii ob institute primireniia storon v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve [Main Provisions of the Concept on the Institute of Conciliation of Parties in Civil Proceedings]. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa = Herald of Civil Procedure, 2015, no. 1, pp. 116, 121. (In Russian)

Sherstуuk V.M. Deistvuiushchii APK RF – etap v razvitii arbitrazhnogo protsessual’nogo zakonodatel’stva [The Current Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation – the Stage in Development of the Arbitration Procedural Law]. Zakonodatel’stvo = Legislation, 2012, no. 6. (In Russian)

Sivak N.V. Uproshchennoe proizvodstvo v arbitrazhnom protsesse: Monografiia [Simplified Procedure in the Arbitration Procedure: Monograph]. Moscow, 2011, p. 4. (In Russian)

Engel’s F. Dialektika prirody [Natural Dialectic]. Moscow, 1969, p. 45. (In Russian)

Sakhnova T.V. Dostizhimo li edinstvo tsivilisticheskogo protsessa? (V kontekste kontseptsii edinogo GPK RF i Kodeksa administrativnogo sudoproizvodstva) [Is Achieved the Unity of Civil Procedure? (In the Context of the Concept of the Unified Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation and the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation)]. Arbitrazhnyi i grazhdanskii protsess = Arbitrate and Civil Procedure, 2015, no. 4. (In Russian)

Information about the author:

Sherstyuk V.M. (Moscow) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Faculty of Law of the Lomonosov Moscow State University (119991, GSP-1, Moscow, Lenin Hills, 1, Building 13 (4th Training Corps), 404a room; e-mail: [email protected]).