We in a citing index:
The Latest Trends in the Foreign Doctrine of International Commercial Arbitration: An Overview
S.A. Kurochkin,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the
Department of Civil Procedure of the Ural State Law University
The article gives an overview of the main trends of the development of the modern foreign doctrine of international commercial arbitration, the most interesting concepts and views. The activities of major international organizations and associations of the most authoritative experts contribute to the development of doctrine. The International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA), the relevant committee of the International Law Association (ILA), the International Bar Association and others actively engaged in this field. Projects implemented under the auspices of the major arbitration institutions give a powerful impetus to the development. Today, a number of trends, uniting supporters of similar views on issues of international commercial arbitration, can be seen in the foreign doctrine. Customary to speak of the existence of four main theories are well known by Russian specialists – contractual, jurisdictional, hybrid (mixed) and autonomous (sui juris). The development of the doctrine of international commercial arbitration today is the result of coordination of impulses coming from the business community and the States by professionals. The growth of international trade generates a request for an effective system of dispute resolution, which arbitration can rightly become.
Keywords: international commercial arbitration; arbitration agreement; arbitration award; arbitrability; concept.
References
Fouchard P., Gaillard E., Goldman B. On International Commercial Arbitration. Hague, 1999.
Partasides C., Blackaby N., Redfern A., Hunter M. Redfern and Hunter on International Arbitration. Oxford, 2015.
Holtzmann H., Neuhaus J. Guide to the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration: Legislative History and Commentary. 1989.
Sanders P. Quo Vadis Arbitration? Sixty Years of Arbitration Practice. Hague, 1999.
Domke M., Edmonson L., Wilner G. Domke on Commercial Arbitration. New York, 2003.
Born G. International Commercial Arbitration. 2nd ed. Alphen aan den Rijn, 2014.
Greenberg S., Kee C., Weeramantry R. International Commercial Arbitration: An Asia-Pacific Perspective. New York, 2011, p. 31.
Lew J., Mistelis L., Kroll S. Comparative International Commercial Arbitration. Hague, 2003, pp. 71–81.
Born G. International Commercial Arbitration. Alphen aan den Rijn, 2009, p. 252.
Wei Shen. Rethinking the New York Convention: A Law and Economics Approach. Cambridge, 2013.
Dezalay Y., Garth B. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago, 1996.
Gaillard E. Sociology of International Arbitration. Arbitration International, 2015, vol. 1, pp. 1–17.
Ronkal’ja R. Nekotorye razmyshlenija otnositel’no budushchego mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha [Some Thoughts on the Future of International Commercial Arbitration]. In Komarov A.S. (ed.). Mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh: sovremennye problemy i resheniya: Sbornik statej k 75-letiyu MKAS pri TPP RF [International Commercial Arbitration: Current Problems and Solutions: Collection of Articles to the 75th Anniversary of the ICAC]. Moscow, 2007, pp. 356–357. (In Russian)
Bühring-Uhle C., Kirchhoff L., Scherer G. Arbitration and Mediation in International Business. Alphen aan den Rijn, 2006, pp. 101–103. Oppetit B. Theorie de l’arbitrage. Paris, 1998.
Gaillard E. Aspects Philosophiques du Droit de l’arbitrage International. Leiden, 2008. Gaillard E. Three Philosophies of International Arbitration. In Rovine A. (ed.). Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation. Leiden, 2010, pp. 306–307.
Gaillard E. Legal Theory of International Arbitration. Leiden, 2010.
Paulsson J. Arbitration in Three Dimensions. LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers, 2010, vol. 2, p. 3 ff.
Paulsson J. The Idea of Arbitration. Oxford, 2013, p. 1.
Born G. The Principle of Judicial Non-Interference in International Arbitral Proceedings. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, summer, 2009, p. 999 ff.
Park W. Arbitration of International Business Disputes: Studies in Law and Practice. Oxford, 2012, p. 51 ff.
Reisman M., Iravani H. The Changing Relation of National Courts and International Commercial Arbitration. The American Review of International Arbitration, 2010, vol. 21, p. 19 ff.
Berg van den J. Should the Setting Aside of the Arbitral Award be abolished? ICSID Review, 2014, vol. 29, pp. 1–26.
Green A., Weiss J. Public Policy and International Arbitration in the European Union. American Review of International Arbitration, 2011, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 661 ff.
Yongping Xiao, Zhengxin Huo. Ordre Public in China’s Private International Law. The American Journal of Comparative Law, summer, 2005, p. 653 ff.
Cobuz Bagnaru A.M. Amendments and Additions Included in the New Romanian Code of Civil Procedure in the Matter of Arbitration. In Czech (& Central European) Yearbook of Arbitration. New York, 2014, pp. 353–357.
Jarrosson Ch., Pellerin J. Le droit francais de l’arbitrage apres le decret du 13 janvier 2011. Rev. Arb., 2011, vol. 5. Böckstiegel K.-H. Past, Present and Future Perspectives of Arbitration. Arbitration International, 2009, vol. 3, pp. 298, 301.
Bernini G. International Arbitration: A Contemporary Perspective. Bologna, 2008, p. 19. Born G. International Arbitration and Forum Selection Agreements: Drafting and Enforcing. Alphen aan den Rijn, 2010.
Hanotiau B. Complex Arbitration: Multiparty, Multicontract, Multi-issue and Class Actions. Hague, 2005, pp. 7–49.
Bělohlávek A. Subjective and Objective Impartiality of Arbitrators and Appointing Authorities as a Part of Procedural Public Policy (Ordre Public) in Arbitration. In Czech (& Central European) Yearbook of Arbitration. New York, 2014, p. 47 ff.
Erpyleva N.Ju. Mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh: institutsionno-normativnyj mehanizm pravovogo regulirovanija [International Commercial Arbitration: Institutional and Regulatory Mechanism of Legal Regulation]. Zakonodatel’stvo i jekonomika = Legislation and Economy, 2011, no. 1, p. 42. (In Russian)
Redfern A., Hunter M. Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration. London, 1986, p. 105.
Mistelis L. Arbitrability – International and Comparative Perspectives. Is Arbitrability a National or an International Law Issue? In Mistelis L., Brekoulakis S. (eds.). Arbitrability: International & Comparative Perspectives. Alphen aan den Rijn, 2009, p. 7.
Brekoulakis S. On Arbitrability: Persisting Misconceptions and New Areas of Concern. In Mistelis L., Brekoulakis S. (eds.). Arbitrability: International & Comparative Perspectives. Alphen aan den Rijn, 2009, p. 39.
Zheng Sophia Tang. Jurisdiction and Arbitration Agreements in International Commercial Law. New York, 2014, p. 93 ff.
Waincymer J. Procedure and Evidence in International Arbitration. Alphen aan den Rijn, 2012. Griffin P. Recent Trends in the Conduct of International Arbitration. Journal of International Arbitration, 2000, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 19.
Turner R. Arbitration Awards: A Practical Approach. Oxford, 2005, pp. 131–185.
Asoskov A.V. Kommentarij k Rekomendatsijam Associatsii mezhdunarodnogo prava o primenenii doktrin lis pendens i res judicata v otnoshenii arbitrazha: osnovnye polozhenija i perspektivy ispol’zovanija v rossijskoj praktike [Commentary on the Recommendations of the Association of International Law on the Application of Doctrines of Lis Pendens and Res Judicata in Relation to Arbitration: Basics and Prospects in the Russian Practice]. Mezhdunarodnyj kommercheskij arbitrazh = International Commercial Arbitration, 2008, no. 2, p. 77. (In Russian)
Soderlund C. Lis Pendens, Res Judicata and the Issue of Parallel Judicial Proceedings. Journal of International Arbitration, 2005, vol. 4, p. 301 ff.
Moses M. The Principles and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration. New York, 2012, pp. 198–199.
Beale N., Bench Nieuwveld L., Nieuwveld M. Summary Arbitration Proceedings: A Comparison between the English and Dutch Regimes. Arbitration International, 2010, vol. 26, p. 139 ff.
Strong S.I. Class, Mass and Collective Arbitration in National and International Law. New York, 2013.
Billiet P. (ed.). Class Arbitration in the European Union. Antwerpen, 2013. Rubino-Sammartano M. International Arbitration Law and Practice. New York, 2014, pp. 1728–1734.
Kaufmann-Kohler G., Schultz T. Online Dispute Resolution: Challenges for Contemporary Justice. Hague, 2004, p. 33.
Coltri L. Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Conflict Diagnosis Approach. 2nd ed. New Jersey, 2010, p. 161 ff.
Veeder V. Is There a Need to Revise the New York Convention. In Gaillard E. (ed.). The Review of International Arbitration Awards. Dijon, 2008, p. 183 ff.
Smit H. Annulment and Enforcement of International Arbitral Awards: A Practical Perspective. American Review of International Arbitration, 2007, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 297–307.
Brekoulakis S. Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: Observations on the Efficiency of the Current System and the Gradual Development of Alternative Means of Enforcement. American Review of International Arbitration, 2008, vol. 19, nos. 3–4, p. 433.
Musin V.A. O sposobah al’ternativnogo razreshenija jekonomicheskih sporov v ramkah SNG. Natsional’nyj doklad SNG [On the Methods of Alternative Resolution of Economic Disputes in the CIS. The National Report of the CIS]. In Maleshin D.Ya. (ed.). Grazhdanskij protsess v mezhkul’turnom dialoge: evrazijskij kontekst: Sbornik dokladov [Civil Procedure in the Intercultural Dialogue: the Eurasian Context: Collection of Reports]. Moscow, 2012, p. 665. (In Russian)
Information about the author
Kurochkin S.A. (Ekaterinburg) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Ural State Law University (620137, Ekaterinburg, Komsomolskaya st., 21, room 404; e-mail: [email protected]).
S.A. Kurochkin
Advertisement
Our partners
