We in a citing index:
On the Issue of Participation of Third Parties without Independent Claims Concerning the Subject of the Dispute at the Court of Appeal
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Judge of the Supreme Court
of the Republic of Tatarstan
The article examines issues of the participation of third parties without independent claims concerning the subject of the dispute at the court of second instance; analyzes problems of this legal institution in law enforcement; examines ways of its further development. Nonjoinder of a third party without independent claims concerning the subject of the dispute may lead unfavorable consequences to an interested party; the avoidance of a third party of participation in the process leads the same consequences for him. In such cases, the court’s decision has the same effect for him as for persons involved in the proceedings in the trial court, conclusions contained in the judgment are prejudicial for him. The fact, that a third party without independent claims concerning the subject of the dispute has not substantive relationships with the opposite side, that these third parties are beyond dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant of legal relationship, affects on his procedural rights as well.
Keywords: third parties without independent claims concerning the subject of the dispute; appeal proceedings; complete, incomplete appeal; recourse action.
Klejnman A.F. Izbrannye trudy [Selected Works]. Krasnodar, 2008, vol. 1, pp. 23–71. (In Russian)
Vikut M.A. 60 let nauchno-pedagogicheskoj dejatel’nosti [60 Years of Scientific and Pedagogical Activity]. Saratov, 2007, p. 39. (In Russian)
Tomilov A.Ju. Sravnitel’naja harakteristika pravovogo polozhenija tret’ih lits, ne zajavljajushchih samostojatel’nyh trebovanij otnositel’no predmeta spora, i lits, osushchestvljajushchih zashchitu chuzhih prav, svobod i zakonnyh interesov [Comparative Characteristics of the Legal Status of Third Parties without Independent Claims Concerning the Subject of the Dispute and Persons Maintaining Defence of Others’ Rights, Freedoms and Legal Interests]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2014, no. 5, p. 23. (In Russian)
Osokina G.L. Pravo na zashchitu v iskovom sudoproizvodstve [Right to Defense in Adversary Justice]. Tomsk, 1990, p. 105. (In Russian) Chechot D.M. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu protsessu [Selected Works on Civil Procedure]. St. Petersburg, 2005, p. 179. (In Russian) Prihod’ko I.A. Protsessual’naja dejatel’nost’ proverochnyh instantsij arbitrazhnogo suda [Procedural Activity of Test Instances of the Arbitration Court]. Moscow, 2008, p. 347. (In Russian)
Gorelov M.V. Tret’i litsa v grazhdanskom protsesse: iz glubiny vekov [Third Parties in Civil Procedure: From the Depths of the Centuries]. Arbitrazhnyj i grazhdanskij protsess = Arbitration and Civil Procedure, 2012, no. 2, p. 23. (In Russian)
Ivanova O.V. Litsa, ne privlechennye k uchastiju v dele, prava kotoryh narusheny resheniem suda [Persons not Involved in the Case, whose Rights are Violated by a Court’s Decision]. Moscow, 2010, p. 160. (In Russian)
Terehova L.A. Sistema peresmotra sudebnyh aktov v mehanizme sudebnoj zashchity [System of Review of Judicial Acts in the Mechanism of Judicial Protection]. Moscow, 2007, p. 181. (In Russian)
Zhilin G.A. Pravosudie po grazhdanskim delam: aktual’nye voprosy: Monografija [Justice in Civil Cases: Current Issues: Monograph]. Moscow, 2010, p. 147. (In Russian)
Information about the author
Shakiryanov R.V. (Kazan) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Judge of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan (420015, Kazan, Pushkin st., build. 72/2; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org).