We in a citing index:
Problem of Opposition to the Procedural Abuses in Matters of Jurisdiction
Head of Legal Department JSC «Nizhnekamskneftekhim»
In the article the author raises the problem of opposition to the procedural abuses of jurisdiction on the example of a specific dispute. By itself, an interpretation that does not consider the merits of the case until has not yet resolved the question of jurisdiction is reasonable. However, it is a reasonable procedural rule does not imply that the badfaith party may claim a baseless request for jurisdiction and then «hang» it complaining about refusal to defer jurisdiction by using the reasonable interpretation of the Supreme Commercial Court of the Russian Federation. According to the author, for equity, for obstacles abuse of the right, prevent extracting benefits from fraud, the Court can and should use its discretion and put an end to abuse of the right. There are many procedural aspects that are not regulated in the procedural codes, but this should not be an obstacle to the use of although not covered by the Code, but effective means.
Keywords: jurisdiction; abuse of the right; extra-procedural requests; analogy of the legal rule.
Sultanov A.R. Protivodeistvie manipulyatsiyam s podsudnost’yu [Opposition to Jurisdictional Manipulations] (in Russian) // Corporate Disputes. 2007. No. 6.
Sultanov A.R. Manipulyatsii s podsudnost’yu [Jurisdictional Manipulations] // Statute. 2008. No. 9. Sultanov A.R. Problema sudebnykh aktov, vynesennykh s narusheniem podsudnosti i podvedomstvennosti [The Problem of Judicial Decisions Made in Violation of the Jurisdiction] (in Russian) // Bulletin of the Federal Arbitration Court of the North Caucasus District. 2010. No. 1.
Shershenevich G.F. Nauka grazhdanskogo prava v Rossii [Science of Civil Law in Russia] (in Russian). M., 2003. P. 241.
Yudin A.V. Vneprotsessual’nye obrashcheniya po grazhdanskim delam: ponyatie, vidy, poryadok raskrytiya i posledstviya [Extra-Procedural Requests in Civil Cases: Concept, Types, Procedure and Consequences of Disclosure] (in Russian) // Statute. 2013. No. 10.
Vas’kovsky E.V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa [Course of Civil Procedure] (in Russian). M., 1913 P. 488.
Nefed’ev E.A. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva. [Textbook of Russian Civil Proceedings] (in Russian). Krasnodar, 2005. P. 127.
Nefed’ev E.A. Uchenie ob iske [The Doctrine of the Lawsuit] (in Russian). Kazan’, 1895. P. 8–9.
Degai P.I. Uchebnaya kniga rossiiskogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva gubernii i oblastei, na obshchikh pravakh sostoyashchikh, sostavlennaya dlya Imperatorskogo uchilishcha pravovedeniya [Textbook of Russian Civil Proceedings in Provinces and Governorates under Common Laws, Formulated for the Imperial College of Law] (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 1840. P. 17.
Kukol’nik V. Rossiiskoe chastnoe grazhdanskoe pravo. Chast’ II. Obryad Grazhdanskogo sudebnogo deloproizvodstva [Russian Private Civil Law. Part II. Procedure of the Civil Court Records] (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 1815. P. 145.
Gol’msten A.Kh. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Textbook of Russian Civil Proceedings] (in Russian). 5th ed. St. Petersburg, 1913. P. 74.
Zagorovsky A.I. Ocherki grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva v novykh administrativnosudebnykh i sudebnykh uchrezhdeniyakh [Essays in Civil Proceedings in the New Administrative and Judicial Institutions] (in Russian). Odessa, 1892. P. 56.
Malyshev K. Kurs grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Course of Civil Proceedings] (in Russian). Vol. 1. St. Petersburg, 1876. P. 165.
Yudel’son K.S. Sovetskii grazhdanskii protsess [Soviet Civil Procedure] (in Russian). M., 1956. P. 189.
Sultanov A.R. Podsudnost’ – eto sub’ektivnoe pravo na rassmotrenie dela v sude v sootvetstvii s ustanovlennoi podsudnost’yu ili garantiya suda, proizvol’no ustanovlennogo zakonodatelem? [Is Jurisdiction a Subjective Right to Consideration of the Case in Court According to the Established Jurisdiction, or a Guarantee of Court Сurrently Established by the Legislator?] (in Russian) // Herald of Civil Procedure. 2013. No. 6.
Valyavina E.Yu. Aktual’nye voprosy zashchity prav sub’ektov predprinimatel’skoi deyatel’nosti v sovremennykh usloviyakh (v praktike arbitrazhnykh sudov) [Topical Issues of Protection of the Rights of Entrepreneurs in Modern Conditions (in the practice of arbitration courts)] (in Russian) // Journal of Russian Law. 2011. No. 1.
Shershenevich G.F. Moim kritikam (po povodu lektsii «O chuvstve zakonnosti») [Reply to My Critics (on the lecture «On the sense of the rule of law»)] (in Russian) // Kazan Telegraph. 1898. No. 1585. P. 3. Sultanov A.R. Pravovaya opredelennost’ i antimonopol’noe zakonodatel’stvo [Legal Certainty and Antitrust Law] (in Russian) // Arbitration Practice. 2007. No. 4.
Information about the author
Sultanov A.R. (Nizhnekamsk) – Head of Legal Department JSC «Nizhnekamskneftekhim» (423574, Tatarstan Republic, Nizhnekamsk, JSC «Nizhnekamskneftekhim»; e-mail: sultanovAR@nknh.ru).