We in a citing index:
The Court as a Participant of Evidence in Civil Proceedings
O.V. Baulin,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department
of Civil Law and Procedure of the Voronezh State University
The need to distinguish between the activities of the courts and the activities of persons involved in a case is objectively. Court and persons involved in the case are the subjects of procedural relations that perform various functions in the proceedings. Functions of the persons involved in the case stemmed from an adversarial form of civil procedure and the status of the alleged participants in the substantial relationship, the nature of the interest in the case and, in turn, its procedural tasks. Functions other actors defined their assigned procedural duties and granted rights. The function of the Court as a judicial body is the resolution of the merits of the case as a form of implementation of the plenary powers in the field of substantive law. In addition, the Court has the procedural process management functions, as well as participants in the process of providing assistance in the realization of their rights. Evidence in the trial court of first instance completed the formulation on the basis of the evidence collected conclusions about the presence or absence of the required facts and fixing these findings in the reasoning of judicial decision.
Keywords: civil procedure; evidence; participant of civil proceedings.
References
Grazhdanskii protsess: Uchebnik [Civil Procedure: Textbook] (in Russian) / Ed. by M.K. Treushnikov. 3rd ed., rev. and exp. M., 2011. P. 90.
Gurvich M.A. Izbrannye trudy: V 2 t. [Selected Works: In 2 vols.] (in Russian). Krasnodar, 2006. P. 50–51, 116–117.
Vaneeva L.A. Sudebnoe poznanie v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse [Judicial Cognition in the Soviet Civil Procedure] (in Russian). Vladivostok, 1972.
Amosov S.M. Sudebnoe poznanie v arbitrazhnom protsesse [Judicial Cognition in the Arbitration Procedure] (in Russian). M., 2003. P. 131–132.
Kleinman A.F. Osnovnye voprosy teorii dokazatel’stv v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse [The Main Problems of the Theory of Evidence in the Soviet Civil Procedure] (in Russian) // Kleinman A.F. Selected Works. Krasnodar, 2008. P. 143.
Yudel’son K.S. Problema dokazyvaniya v sovetskom grazhdanskom protsesse [The Problem of Proof in the Soviet Civil Procedure] (in Russian). M., 1951. P. 81.
Treushnikov M.K. Sudebnye dokazatel’stva [Judicial Evidence] (in Russian). 4th ed., rev. and. exp. M., 2005. P. 43, 55.
Molchanov V.V. Sobiranie dokazatel’stv v grazhdanskom protsesse [Collection of Evidence in Civil Proceedings] (in Russian). M., 1991. P. 8, 47.
Reshetnikova I.V., Yarkov V.V. Grazhdanskoe pravo i grazhdanskii protsess v sovremennoi Rossii [Civil Law and Civil Procedure in Modern Russia] (in Russian). M., 1999. P. 162.
Reshetnikova I.V. Dokazyvanie v grazhdanskom protsesse: Uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie [Proof in Civil Proceedings: Educational and Practical Guide] (in Russian). 3rd ed., rev. and exp. M., 2013. P. 31–32.
Fokina M.A. Mekhanizm dokazyvaniya po grazhdanskim delam: teoretikoprikladnye problem [Mechanism of Proof in Civil Cases: Theoretical and Applied Problems] (in Russian). M., 2010. P. 474–477.
Popov B.V. Raspredelenie dokazatel’stv mezhdu storonami v grazhdanskom protsesse. Kritiko-dogmaticheskoe issledovanie [Distribution of Evidence between the Parties in Civil Proceedings. Critical-Dogmatic Study] (in Russian). Har’kov, 1905. P. 8.
Gurvich M. Yavlyaetsya li dokazyvanie v grazhdanskom protsesse yuridicheskoi obyazannost’yu? [Is the Proof in Civil Proceedings a Legal Obligation?] (in Russian) // Soviet Justice. 1975. No. 5. P. 14–15. Zhilin G.A. Pravosudie po grazhdanskim delam: aktual’nye voprosy [Justice in Civil Matters: Current Issues] (in Russian): Monograph. M., 2010. P. 498.
Osobennosti rassmotreniya otdel’nykh kategorii grazhdanskikh del: Uchebnoe posobie [Features of Consideration of Certain Categories of Civil Cases: Educational Guide] (in Russian). M., 1995. P. 13. Vlasov A.A. Veshchestvennye dokazatel’stva v grazhdanskom protsesse [Physical Evidence in Civil Proceedings] (in Russian). M., 1999. P. 53.
Kurs sovetskogo grazhdanskogo protsessual’nogo prava: V 2 t. [Course of Soviet Civil Procedural Law: In 2 vols.] (in Russian) / Ed. by A.A. Mel’nikov. M., 1981. Vol. 1. P. 343, 345–346.
Yarkov V.V. Yuridicheskie fakty v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Legal Facts in Civilistic Process] (in Russian). M., 2012. P. 155.
Tkachev N.I. Zakonnost’ i obosnovannost’ sudebnykh postanovlenii po grazhdanskim delam [Legality and Validity of Judgments in Civil Cases] (in Russian). Saratov, 1987. P. 46–47.
Bonner A.T. Traditsionnye i netraditsionnye sredstva dokazyvaniya v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsesse [Traditional and Non-Traditional Means of Proof in Civil and Arbitration Procedure] (in Russian). M., 2013. P. 20–29.
Information about the author
Baulin O.V. (Voronezh) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department of Civil Law and Procedure of the Voronezh State University (394006, Voronezh, Lenin sq., 10a, bldg. 9, room 710; e-mail: [email protected]).
O.V. Baulin
Advertisement
Our partners
