We in a citing index:
About Some Aspects of the Right to Judicial Protection of the Incapacitated and Partially Incapacitated Persons
S.F. Afanasiev,
Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure
of the Saratov State Law Academy, Retired Judge
In article taking into account historical digression discusses the problem of realization of the right to judicial protection by persons which have been recognized in the order established by the law by incapacitated or partially incapacitated is considered. It is proved, that in the Romano-Germanic legal family concerning the specified persons various remedial restrictions that has been caused by features of their substantive status were traditionally used, not allowing to the full to participate in personal property and non-property, and, hence, in procedural relations. The conclusion that now under the influence of various norms of international law the legal doctrine and judiciary practice gradually began to change own representation about a nature of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of the persons incapacitated and limited in capacity becomes. In the international contracts and recommendations the trend to refusal of rigid medical model of incapacity, differentiation of formal and functional incapacity, and also to transition to the formula of the minimum restriction of the rights of citizens, including in sphere of civil justice is traced. The last needs to be taken into consideration during the further reforming and perfection of the domestic civil remedial legislation.
Keywords: court; civil proceedings; incapacity; restriction in capacity; proportionality of the purposes and means; the right to judicial protection; access to justice; the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation; the European Court of Human Rights.
References
Zaikov A.V. Rimskoe chastnoe pravo v sistematicheskom izlozhenii [Roman Private Law in a Systematic Exposition] (in Russian). M., 2012.
Savigny F.C. von. Sistema sovremennogo rimskogo prava [System of the Modern Roman Law] (in Russian). M., 2011. Vol. I. P. 475.
Sohm R. Institutsii. Istoriya i sistema rimskogo grazhdanskogo prava. Ch. 2. Sistema. Vyp. I. Obshchaya chast’ i veshchnoe pravo [Institutes. History and System of the Roman Civil Law. Second Part. System. Issue I. General Part and Right in rem] (in Russian). Sergiev Posad, 1916. Vol. II. P. 22.
Novitsky I.B. Osnovy rimskogo grazhdanskogo prava [Elements of the Roman Civil Law] (in Russian). M., 1956. P. 41–44.
Gordon A. Predstavitel’stvo v grazhdanskom prave [Representation in Civil Law] (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 1879. P. 53–63.
Pokrovsky I.A. Istoriya rimskogo prava [History of Roman Law] (in Russian). 3rd ed., rev. and exp. Petrograd, 1917. P. 368–373.
Belogrud N.E. Rimskoe pravo. Istochniki, istoriya, institutsii [Roman Law. Sources, History, Institutes] (in Russian). Kiev, 1894. P. 145.
Puchta G.F. Kurs rimskogo grazhdanskogo prava. T. 1 [The Course of the Roman Civil Law. Vol. 1] (in Russian). M., 1874. P. 133.
Dozhdev D.V. Rimskoe chastnoe pravo [Roman Private Law] (in Russian). 2nd ed., rev. and exp. M., 2004. P. 292.
Dil’ Sh. Justinian i Vizantiiskaya tsivilizatsiya v VI v. [Justinian and the Byzantine Civilization in VIth Century] (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 1908. P. 266.
Bogolepov N. Posobie k lektsiyam po istorii rimskogo prava [Textbook to the Lectures on the History of Roman Law] (in Russian). M., 1890. P. 303–305.
Garrido M.H.G. Rimskoe chastnoe pravo: kazusy, iski, instituty [Roman Private Law: Cases, Actions, Institutions] (in Russian). M., 2005. P. 162.
Kantorowicz E.H. Dva tela korolya. Issledovanie po srednevekovoi politicheskoi teologii [The King’s Two Bodies: A Study in Mediaeval Political Theology] (in Russian) / Trans. from English by A.Yu. Seregina; Ed. by M.A. Boitsov. M., 2005.
Modderman W. Retseptsiya rimskogo prava [Reception of Roman Law] (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 1888.
Vinogradov P.G. Ocherki po teorii prava. Rimskoe pravo v srednevekovoi Evrope [Essays on the Theory of Law. Roman Law in Medieval Europe] (in Russian). M., 2010.
Muromtsev S.A. Receptsiya rimskogo prava na zapade [Reception of Roman Law in the West] (in Russian). M., 1886. P. 128.
Mikhailov M.M. Russkoe grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo v istoricheskom ego razvitii ot Ulozheniya 1649 goda do izdaniya Svoda zakonov [Russian Civil Procedure in the Historical Development from the Code of 1649 to the Publication of the Code of Laws] (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 1856. P. 67–75.
Sanfilippo C. Kurs rimskogo chastnogo prava [The Course of Roman Private Law] (in Russian) / Trans. from Italian by I.I. Makhan’kov; Ed. by D.V. Dozhdev. M., 2007. P. 87.
Yablochkov T.M. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Textbook of Russian Civil Procedure] (in Russian). Yaroslavl’, 1912. P. 61.
Vas’kovsky E.V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa. T. I. Sub’ekty i ob’ekty protsessa, protsessual’nye otnosheniya i deistviya [The Course of Civil Procedure. Vol. I. Legal Procedural Subjects and Objects, Procedural Relations and Actions] (in Russian). M., 1913. P. 577.
Gol’msten A.Kh. Yuridicheskie issledovaniya i stat’i (Obshchaya teoriya prava. Obychnoe pravo. Grazhdanskoe pravo. Torgovoe pravo. Grazhdanskii protsess) [Legal Studies and Articles (General Theory of Law. Customary Law. Civil Law. Commercial Law. Civil Procedure)] (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 1894. P. 462–464, 475.
Canstein R. von. Die rationellen Grundlagen des Civilprozesses und deren Durchführung in den neuesten Civilprozess-Gesetzentwürfen Österreichs und Deutschlands. Manz, 1877.
Debol’sky N.N. Grazhdanskaya deesposobnost’ po russkomu pravu do kontsa XVII v. [Civil Capacity by Russian Law before the End of the XVIIth Century] (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 1903.
Nefed’ev E.A. Uchebnik russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva [Textbook of Russian Civil Procedure] (in Russian). M., 1909. P. 113–119.
Ustav grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva s sistematizirovannym sobraniem zakonodatel’nykh motivov ko vsem uzakoneniyam i raz’yasnenii Pravitel’stvuyushchego Senata i Ministerstva yustitsii [Charter of Civil Procedure with a Systematic Collection of Legislative Motives to All of Laws and Explanations of the Governing Senate and the Ministry of Justice] / Comp. by V.M. Gordon (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 1914. Grazhdanskii protsess: Uchebnik [Civil Procedure: Textbook] (in Russian) / Ed. by S.N. Abramov. M., 1948. P. 87–88.
Gurvich M.A. Pravo na isk [Right of Action] (in Russian). M.; L., 1949. P. 106–107.
Commentary on the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation (in Russian). M., 2003. P. 80 (author of the commentary to the Art. 36 – D.B. Abushenko).
Yarkov V.V. Yuridicheskie fakty v tsivilisticheskom protsesse [Legal Facts in Civilistic Process] (in Russian). M., 2012. P. 205–207.
Sakhnova T.V. Kurs grazhdanskogo protsessa [The Course of Civil Procedure] (in Russian). M., 2008. P. 328.
Andrews N. Sistema grazhdanskogo protsessa Anglii. Sudebnoe razbiratel’stvo, mediatsiya i arbirazh [The System of English Civil Procedure. Court Proceedings, Mediation, and Arbitration] (in Russian) / Transl. from English by M.Yu. Maslov; Ed. by R.M. Khodykin. M., 2012. P. 83.
Demeneva A. Evropeiskie standarty zashchity prava na dostup k pravosudiyu i rossiiskaya pravoprimenitel’naya praktika [European Standards for the Protection of the Right to Access to Justice and the Russian Law Enforcement Practice] (in Russian) // European Standards of the Right to a Fair Trial and the Russian Practice / Ed. by A.V. Demeneva. Ekaterinburg, 2004. P. 88–89.
Yudin A.V. Novoe ponimanie kategorii «grazhdanskaya protsessual’naya nedeesposobnost’» i delo Shtukaturova [A New Understanding of the Category «Civil Procedural Incapacity» and Shtukaturov’s Case] (in Russian) // Civilist. 2012. No. 1. P. 109.
Zeiger M.V., Sheifer M.S., Yudin A.V. «Nepolnaya mera» deesposobnosti v grazhdanskom prave: yuridicheskii, meditsinskii i psikhologicheskii aspekt (postanovka problemy) [«Short Measure» Capacity in Civil Law: Legal, Medical and Psychological Aspects (problem statement)] (in Russian)// Legal Psychology. 2012. No. 3. P. 3.
Prikhod’ko I.A. Dostupnost’ pravosudiya v arbitrazhnom i grazhdanskom protsesse: osnovnye problemy [Access to Justice in Arbitration and Civil Procedure: The Main Problems] (in russian). St. Petersburg, 2005. P. 256.
Information about the author
Afanasiev S.F. (Saratov) – Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Department of Civil Procedure of the Saratov State Law Academy, Retired Judge (410056, Saratov, Chernyshevsky st., 104, Department of Civil Procedure of the Saratov State Law Academy; e-mail: [email protected]).
S.F. Afanasiev
Advertisement
Our partners
