Herald of Civil Procedure
EN
main-photo

We in a citing index:

Impact of Pagan Religious Idea of Revenge on Old East Slavic Civil Procedure

M.E. Poskrebnev,
Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of Department of Civil, 
Commercial and Administrative Procedure of the Russian Academy of Justice


This article analyzes the influence of pagan ideas about revenge on the rules governing the proof and evidence in old Russian civil proceedings. A significant impact of revenge on material relationships in ancient Russia allowed us to assume that the procedure rules does not escape this influence. Indeed, it can be found in the rules governing the proof and evidence. Based on the truth of the nature of the evidence test (water, fire, etc.) may be established, under the influence of the pagan Slavs and their understanding of faith revenge. Revenge is the offense as much as with good act: both in the nature of things requires requital; offense had retaliatory offense, like the good deed leads to reciprocal gratitude on the part of the recipient, and the rules of the old Court, formed under the influence of pagan ideas of revenge, the Slavs were called to prevent the mixing of requitals. The judicial duel is a means in which revenge was realized most clearly, therefore, encounter a measure does not pose difficulties, practically all of the known rules governing the proof, one way or another, are proportionality (peer takes fight with equal), i.e. not allowing original superiority of one of the parties. 

Keywords: ancient Slavs; paganism; vengeance; nature; old Russian civil litigation; Russian Justice; the right of retribution; measure; litigant; the judicial duel; oath; the ordeal by iron; the ordeal by water; means of proof; evidence; witness statements.


References 

   Sreznevsky I.I. Svyatilishcha i obryady yazycheskogo bogosluzheniya drevnikh slavyan, po svidetel’stvam sovremennym i predanijam [Sanctuaries and Worships Pagan Ceremonies of Ancient Slavs, on the Modern Testimony and Legends] (in Russian). Har’kov, 1846. P. 5. 
  Kastorsky M. Nachertanie slavyanskoi mifologii [Inscription of Slavic Mythology] (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 1841. P. 19.   
  Golenishchev-Kutuzov D. «Russkaya Pravda» i Vizantiya (opyt istoriko-yuridicheskoi monografii) [«Russian Justice» and Byzantium (the experience of the historical and legal monograph)] (in Russian). Irkutsk, 1913. P. 16. 
  Dyuvernua N. Istochniki prava i sud v Drevnei Rossii: Opyt po istorii russkogo grazhdanskogo prava [Sources of Law and Justice in Ancient Russia: Experience on the History of Russian Civil Law] (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 2004. P. 51–53, 81. 
  Pakhman S.V. O sudebnykh dokazatel’stvakh po drevnemu russkomu pravu, preimushchestvenno grazhdanskomu, v istoricheskom ikh razvitii [On Court Evidences in the Ancient Russian Law, Mostly Civilian, in Their Historical Development] (in Russian). M., 1851. P. 3.   Mikhailov M. Istoriya obrazovaniya i razvitiya sistemy russkogo grazhdanskogo sudoproizvodstva do Ulozheniya 1649 goda [History of the Formation and Development of Russian Civil Procedure before Code of 1649] (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 1848. P. 110. 
  Kunitsyn A. Istoricheskoe izobrazhenie drevnego sudoproizvodstva v Rossii [Historic Representation of the Ancient Proceedings in Russia] (in Russian). St. Petersburg, 1843. P. 114. 
   Zelinsky F.F. Iz zhizni idei: V 2 t. [From Life of Ideas: In 2 vols] (in Russian). Vols. 1–2 (reprint from eds. 1911, 1916). M., 1995. P. 5–8. 
   Fragmenty rannikh grecheskikh filosofov [Fragments of Early Greek Philosophers] (in Russian) / Ed. by I.D. Rozhansky. Ch. 1. M., 1989. P. 127 (Anaksimander. 1 DK). 
  Kessidi F. Geraklit [Heraclitus] (in Russian). 3rd ed., rev. and exp. St. Petersburg, 2004. P. 55–56. 
 Mifologicheskii slovar’ [Mythological Dictionary] (in Russian). M, 1990. P. 620. 
  Demchenko V. O pokazaniyakh svidetelei kak dokazatel’stve po delam sudebnym, po russkomu pravu do Petra velikogo [On the Testimony of Witnesses as Evidence for Court, according to Russian Law to Peter the Great] (in Russian). Kiev, 1859. P. 19. 

Information about the author 

   Poskrebnev M.E. (Moscow) – Candidate of Legal Sciences, Associate Professor of Department of Civil, Commercial and Administrative Procedure of the Russian Academy of Justice (117418, Moscow, Novocheremushkinskaya st., 69, bldg. «A»; e-mail: raj-priem@mail.ru).

 el_.png   it_.png   book.png


M.E. Poskrebnev